The Use of Prosody in Syntactic Disambiguation

Prosodic structure and syntactic structure are not identical; neither are they unrelated. Knowing when and how the two correspond could yield better quality speech synthesis, could aid in the disambiguation of competing syntactic hypotheses in speech understanding, and could lead to a more comprehensive view of human speech processing. In a set of experiments involving 35 pairs of phonetically similar sentences representing seven types of structural contrasts, the perceptual evidence shows that some, but not all, of the pairs can be disambiguated on the basis of prosodic differences. The phonological evidence relates the disambiguation primarily to boundary phenomena, although prominences sometimes play a role. Finally, phonetic analyses describing the attributes of these phonological markers indicate the importance of both absolute and relative measures.

[1]  D. Robert Ladd,et al.  Intonational phrasing: the case for recursive prosodic structure , 1986, Phonology.

[2]  W. Cooper,et al.  Declination of fundamental frequency in speakers' production of parenthetical and main clauses. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  T. Crystal,et al.  Articulation rate and the duration of syllables and stress groups in connected speech. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  A precursor of language acquisition in young infants , 1988, Cognition.

[5]  W. Nick Campbell,et al.  Evidence for a syllable-based model of speech timing , 1990, ICSLP.

[6]  L. Streeter.  Acoustic determinants of phrase boundary perception. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  D. Duez,et al.  Perception of Silent Pauses in Continuous Speech , 1985, Language and speech.

[8]  J. Bernstein,et al.  Syntax and speech , 1984, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[9]  I. Lehiste.  Phonetic Disambiguation of Syntactic Ambiguity , 1973 .

[10]  A E Geers,et al.  Intonation contour and syntactic structure as predictors of apparent segmentation. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  Mari Ostendorf,et al.  A methodology for analyzing prosody , 1988 .

[12]  Eileen Fitzpatrick,et al.  A Computational Grammar of Discourse-Neutral Prosodic Phrasing in English , 1990, Comput. Linguistics.

[13]  R. Scholes,et al.  On the Spoken Disambiguation of Superficially Ambiguous Sentences , 1971, Language and speech.

[14]  J. Pierrehumbert.  The phonology and phonetics of English intonation , 1987 .

[15]  W. Cooper,et al.  Fundamental frequency contours at syntactic boundaries. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  John Bear,et al.  The Use of Relative Duration in Syntactic Disambiguation , 1990, HLT.

[17]  D. Klatt.  Vowel Lengthening is Syntactically Determined in a Connected Discourse. , 1975 .

[18]  Irene Vogel,et al.  Prosodic Structure Above the Word , 1983 .

[19]  I. Hirsh.  Intonation, Perception, and Language. , 1968 .

[20]  Janet Mueller Bing.  A Discourse Domain Identified by Intonation , 1984 .

[21]  Colin W. Wightman,et al.  Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  A. Prince,et al.  On stress and linguistic rhythm , 1977 .

[23]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure , 1984 .

[24]  Hy Murveit,et al.  Linguistic constraints in hidden Markov model based speech recognition , 1989, International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing,.

[25]  D. Gibbon,et al.  Intonation, accent, and rhythm : studies in discourse phonology , 1984 .

[26]  N. Thorsen,et al.  A study of perception of sentence intonation--evidence from Danish. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  Frank Parker,et al.  Some suprasegmental characteristics of relative clauses in English , 1982 .

[28]  James Paul Gee,et al.  Performance structures: A psycholinguistic and linguistic appraisal , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  Р.К. Потапова.  Intonation, accent and rhythm: Studies in discourse phonology. Berlin, New-York, 1984 , 1986 .

[30]  Mari Ostendorf,et al.  The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation , 1991 .

[31]  D H Klatt,et al.  Review of text-to-speech conversion for English. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  T. Crystal,et al.  Segmental durations in connected‐speech signals: Current results , 1988 .

[33]  Nina Gro nnum Thorsen,et al.  Intonation and text in Standard Danish , 1985 .

[34]  J. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Intonational structure in Japanese and English , 1986, Phonology.

[35]  D. Scott,et al.  Duration as a cue to the perception of a phrase boundary. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  I. Lehiste,et al.  Role of duration in disambiguating syntactically ambiguous sentences , 1975 .

[37]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Clauses are perceptual units for young infants , 1987, Cognition.

[38]  Mari Ostendorf,et al.  Automatic recognition of prosodic phrases , 1991, [Proceedings] ICASSP 91: 1991 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.