Breast cancer in women under 40 years of age: a series of 57 cases from Northern Ireland.

BACKGROUND There are few studies examining breast cancer in women under the age of 40 years, particularly in western European populations. Such tumours are reported to be more aggressive, possibly due to a different pathophysiology compared to older patients. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of all women less than 40 years of age, diagnosed or treated with breast cancer, from June 2001 to June 2007 to assess pathophysiological factors that may influence clinical outcome and prognosis including patient demographics, clinical presentation, pre-operative investigations, surgical and pathological findings, treatment and outcome. RESULTS Fifty-eight women (mean age 34.9 years, range 27-39 years) were identified. One patient was excluded due to incomplete data; 98.2% (n=56) patients presented directly to our symptomatic clinic; 89.5% (n=51) patients had a palpable lump; 71.9% (n=41) patients had no family history. Mammography was less sensitive than ultrasound (64.3% vs. 82.4%) while fine needle aspiration cytology was 92.5% sensitive for malignancy. Twenty-nine (50.9%) patients underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS) of which 7 proceeded subsequently to completion mastectomy due to involved margins. Twenty-six (45.6%) patients required total mastectomy primarily while 2 (3.5%) patients were treated palliatively due to metastatic disease. The mean tumour size (nearest resection margin) was 2.13cm (2.58mm) for BCS and 3.95cm (6.38mm) for mastectomy. From a total of 55 primary resections, 85.5% (n=47) of tumours were invasive ductal carcinoma; 57.4% (n=31) and 40.7% (n=22) were grade II and III tumours respectively. Lymphovascular invasion was identified in 50.9% (n=28) while 40.0% (n=22) were lymph node positive for metastatic disease. 76.8% (n=43), 39.3% (n=22) and 30.2% (n=16) were oestrogen, progesterone and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 positive respectively. The mean Nottingham prognostic index was 4.37 (range 2.2-8.4). Neo-adjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 9.3% (n=5) and 80.0% (n=44) of surgically treated patients respectively while 76.4% (n=42) patients received adjuvant radiotherapy. 76.4% (n=42) of patients were treated with tamoxifen. Four patients received Herceptin therapy. Statistically significant univariate factors adversely associated with overall survival were time from referral to out-patient department attendance (p=0.038), administration of neo-adjuvant treatment (p=0.019), surgical intervention (p<0.001), progesterone receptor positivity (p=0.018) and tumour recurrence (p<0.001). 86.0% (n=49) patients were alive at mean follow-up of 52 months; 82.5% (n=47) remain disease free. CONCLUSION Our study reports a low familial trait rate combined with a high proportion of hormonally active tumours less than grade III which suggests that breast cancer in this series of young women from Northern Ireland may be less aggressive and more hormonally responsive than anticipated.

[1]  P. Tan,et al.  Breast carcinoma in women 35 years and younger: a pathological study , 2006, Pathology.

[2]  S. Gautam,et al.  Factors Affecting Outcome for Young Women with Early Stage Invasive Breast Cancer Treated with Breast-conserving Therapy , 2006, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[3]  Saveli Goldberg,et al.  Current Perceptions Regarding Surgical Margin Status After Breast-Conserving Therapy: Results of a Survey , 2005, Annals of surgery.

[4]  A. Luini,et al.  Very young women (<35 years) with operable breast cancer: features of disease at presentation. , 2002, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[5]  Young age is a poor prognostic factor in women with stage I breast cancer , 2006 .

[6]  M. Castiglione,et al.  The enigma of young age. , 2006, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[7]  L. Norton,et al.  BRCA-associated breast cancer in young women. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  D. Winchester,et al.  Breast cancer in young women. , 1996, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[9]  B. Zehnbauer,et al.  Inherited breast cancer. , 1996, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[10]  D. Allred,et al.  Breast cancer outcome and predictors of outcome: are there age differentials? , 1994, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[11]  S J Schnitt,et al.  Outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  K. Jamrozik,et al.  Surgical caseload and outcomes for women with invasive breast cancer treated in Western Australia. , 2005, Breast.

[13]  MRCSI Mary F. Dillon MB,et al.  A Pathologic Assessment of Adequate Margin Status in Breast-Conserving Therapy , 2006, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[14]  M. Lesser,et al.  Breast Carcinoma in Women 35 Years of Age or Younger , 1984, Annals of surgery.

[15]  C. V. D. Velde,et al.  The preferred treatment for young women with breast cancer--mastectomy versus breast conservation. , 2006 .

[16]  L Collette,et al.  Can patient-, treatment- and pathology-related characteristics explain the high local recurrence rate following breast-conserving therapy in young patients? , 2003, European journal of cancer.

[17]  D. Neuberg,et al.  Relationship of patient age to pathologic features of the tumor and prognosis for patients with stage I or II breast cancer. , 1994, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  R. Spence,et al.  Ultrasound is a useful adjunct to mammography in the assessment of breast tumours in all patients , 2009, International journal of clinical practice.

[19]  J. Marks,et al.  Young age at diagnosis correlates with worse prognosis and defines a subset of breast cancers with shared patterns of gene expression. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  L Duchateau,et al.  Risk factors for recurrence and metastasis after breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma-in-situ: analysis of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial 10853. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  H. Goodare,et al.  NHS breast screening programme , 1999, BMJ.

[22]  H. Adami,et al.  Age as a prognostic factor in breast cancer , 1985, Cancer.

[23]  F. Vicini,et al.  Differences in the pathologic features of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast based on patient age , 2000, Cancer.

[24]  J. Rodriguez-Sierra,et al.  Younger women with breast carcinoma have a poorer prognosis than older women , 1996, Cancer.

[25]  J. V. van Nes,et al.  The preferred treatment for young women with breast cancer--mastectomy versus breast conservation. , 2006, Breast.

[26]  A. Porter,et al.  The diagnosis of breast cancer in women younger than 40. , 2004, Breast.

[27]  K. Horst,et al.  Locoregional management of breast cancer in women younger than 40 , 2010 .

[28]  C. V. D. van de Velde,et al.  Preoperative chemotherapy in primary operable breast cancer: results from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer trial 10902. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  M. Gnant,et al.  Young age as an independent adverse prognostic factor in premenopausal patients with breast cancer. , 2002, Clinical breast cancer.

[30]  L. Carey,et al.  What is triple-negative breast cancer? , 2008, European journal of cancer.

[31]  S. Seal,et al.  Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations in patients with early-onset breast cancer. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[32]  L. Cortesi,et al.  BRCA1 mutations and clinicopathological features in a sample of Italian women with early-onset breast cancer. , 2000, European journal of cancer.

[33]  E. Rosato,et al.  Factors associated with a positive reexcision after excisional biopsy for invasive breast cancer. , 1995, Surgery.

[34]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Trends in breast cancer presentation and care according to age in a single institution. , 2004, American journal of surgery.

[35]  B. Jamin The diagnosis. , 2009, Dermatology online journal.

[36]  P. Tan,et al.  IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL EXPRESSION OF HORMONE RECEPTORS IN INVASIVE BREAST CARCINOMA: CORRELATION OF RESULTS OF H‐SCORE WITH PATHOLOGICAL PARAMETERS , 2001, Pathology.

[37]  I. Ellis,et al.  The Nottingham prognostic index in primary breast cancer , 2005, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.