Analysis of In-Vivo LacR-Mediated Gene Repression Based on the Mechanics of DNA Looping

Interactions of E. coli lac repressor (LacR) with a pair of operator sites on the same DNA molecule can lead to the formation of looped nucleoprotein complexes both in vitro and in vivo. As a major paradigm for loop-mediated gene regulation, parameters such as operator affinity and spacing, repressor concentration, and DNA bending induced by specific or non-specific DNA-binding proteins (e.g., HU), have been examined extensively. However, a complete and rigorous model that integrates all of these aspects in a systematic and quantitative treatment of experimental data has not been available. Applying our recent statistical-mechanical theory for DNA looping, we calculated repression as a function of operator spacing (58–156 bp) from first principles and obtained excellent agreement with independent sets of in-vivo data. The results suggest that a linear extended, as opposed to a closed v-shaped, LacR conformation is the dominant form of the tetramer in vivo. Moreover, loop-mediated repression in wild-type E. coli strains is facilitated by decreased DNA rigidity and high levels of flexibility in the LacR tetramer. In contrast, repression data for strains lacking HU gave a near-normal value of the DNA persistence length. These findings underscore the importance of both protein conformation and elasticity in the formation of small DNA loops widely observed in vivo, and demonstrate the utility of quantitatively analyzing gene regulation based on the mechanics of nucleoprotein complexes.

[1]  Jay D. Gralla,et al.  DNA dynamic flexibility and protein recognition: Differential stimulation by bacterial histone-like protein HU , 1988, Cell.

[2]  J. Gralla,et al.  Probing co-operative DNA-binding in vivo. The lac O1:O3 interaction. , 1988, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  O. Espéli,et al.  Untangling intracellular DNA topology , 2004, Molecular microbiology.

[4]  Rob Phillips,et al.  High flexibility of DNA on short length scales probed by atomic force microscopy , 2006, Nature nanotechnology.

[5]  Leonor Saiz,et al.  Inferring the in vivo looping properties of DNA. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  D. Normanno,et al.  Real-time observation of DNA looping dynamics of Type IIE restriction enzymes NaeI and NarI , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[7]  R. L. Baldwin,et al.  Energetics of DNA twisting. I. Relation between twist and cyclization probability. , 1983, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  T. Steitz,et al.  Crystal structure of lac repressor core tetramer and its implications for DNA looping. , 1995, Science.

[9]  Jie Yan,et al.  Statistics of loop formation along double helix DNAs. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  Donald M. Crothers,et al.  High-throughput approach for detection of DNA bending and flexibility based on cyclization , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  L. J. Maher,et al.  HMG Proteins and DNA Flexibility in Transcription Activation , 2001, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[12]  M C Mossing,et al.  Upstream operators enhance repression of the lac promoter. , 1986, Science.

[13]  D M Crothers,et al.  The influence of polyvalency on the binding properties of antibodies. , 1972, Immunochemistry.

[14]  L. Finzi,et al.  Measurement of lactose repressor-mediated loop formation and breakdown in single DNA molecules , 1995, Science.

[15]  Akira Ishihama,et al.  Two types of localization of the DNA‐binding proteins within the Escherichia coli nucleoid , 2000, Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms.

[16]  J. E. Rubio,et al.  The Theory of Linear Systems , 1971 .

[17]  Stephen D. Levene,et al.  DNA/RNA Flexibility , 2002 .

[18]  Homer Jacobson,et al.  Intramolecular Reaction in Polycondensations. I. The Theory of Linear Systems , 1950 .

[19]  D. Crothers,et al.  Statistical mechanics of sequence-dependent circular DNA and its application for DNA cyclization. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[20]  M. Lewis,et al.  The lac repressor. , 2005, Comptes rendus biologies.

[21]  Yongli Zhang,et al.  Statistical-mechanical theory of DNA looping. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[22]  H. Echols,et al.  Multiple DNA-protein interactions governing high-precision DNA transactions. , 1986, Science.

[23]  Jonathan Widom,et al.  Spontaneous sharp bending of double-stranded DNA. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[24]  M. Record,et al.  In vivo thermodynamic analysis of repression with and without looping in lac constructs. Estimates of free and local lac repressor concentrations and of physical properties of a region of supercoiled plasmid DNA in vivo. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  R. L. Baldwin,et al.  DNA flexibility studied by covalent closure of short fragments into circles. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Victor B. Zhurkin,et al.  Gal repressosome contains an antiparallel DNA loop , 2001, Nature Structural Biology.

[27]  E. Le Cam,et al.  A new approach to DNA bending by polyamines and its implication in DNA condensation , 2006, European Biophysics Journal.

[28]  Keith R. Yamamoto,et al.  Biological Regulation and Development , 1982, Springer US.

[29]  Terence Hwa,et al.  Transcriptional regulation by the numbers: models. , 2005, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[30]  P. V. Hippel,et al.  On the Molecular Bases of the Specificity of Interaction of Transcriptional Proteins with Genome DNA , 1979 .

[31]  S. Leibler,et al.  DNA looping and physical constraints on transcription regulation. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[32]  S. Halford,et al.  Alternative geometries of DNA looping: an analysis using the SfiI endonuclease. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[33]  Jie Yan,et al.  Localized single-stranded bubble mechanism for cyclization of short double helix DNA. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[34]  Reid C. Johnson,et al.  Micromechanical analysis of the binding of DNA-bending proteins HMGB1, NHP6A, and HU reveals their ability to form highly stable DNA-protein complexes. , 2004, Biochemistry.

[35]  Yongli Zhang,et al.  Predicting indirect readout effects in protein-DNA interactions. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  F. Young Biochemistry , 1955, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[37]  Vadim V. Demidov,et al.  Nucleic Acids: Structures, Properties and Functions , 2001 .

[38]  J. Widom,et al.  DNA twisting flexibility and the formation of sharply looped protein-DNA complexes. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  Leonor Saiz,et al.  DNA looping in gene regulation: from the assembly of macromolecular complexes to the control of transcriptional noise. , 2005, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[40]  M. Fried,et al.  In Vitro Interaction of theEscherichia coli Cyclic AMP Receptor Protein with the Lactose Repressor* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[41]  N. Cozzarelli,et al.  Use of site-specific recombination as a probe of DNA structure and metabolism in vivo. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[42]  H. Zhou,et al.  The affinity-enhancing roles of flexible linkers in two-domain DNA-binding proteins. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[43]  Rob Phillips,et al.  Exact theory of kinkable elastic polymers. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[44]  P. Hagerman,et al.  DNA ring closure mediated by protein HU. , 1989, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[45]  Benno Müller-Hill,et al.  Repression oflacPromoter as a Function of Distance, Phase and Quality of an AuxiliarylacOperator , 1996 .

[46]  Hernan G. Garcia,et al.  Transcriptional Regulation by the Numbers 2: Applications , 2004, q-bio/0412011.

[47]  T. L. Hill Linear Aggregation Theory in Cell Biology , 1987, Springer Series in Molecular Biology.

[48]  Michael D. Stone,et al.  Structural transitions and elasticity from torque measurements on DNA , 2003, Nature.

[49]  B. Müller-Hill,et al.  Repression of lac promoter as a function of distance, phase and quality of an auxiliary lac operator. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[50]  D. Porschke Persistence length and bending dynamics of DNA from electrooptical measurements at high salt concentrations. , 1991, Biophysical chemistry.

[51]  D. Crothers,et al.  DNA bending, flexibility, and helical repeat by cyclization kinetics. , 1992, Methods in enzymology.

[52]  K Rippe,et al.  Making contacts on a nucleic acid polymer. , 2001, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[53]  R. Schleif,et al.  In vivo DNA loops in araCBAD: size limits and helical repeat. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  M. Haykinson,et al.  DNA looping and the helical repeat in vitro and in vivo: effect of HU protein and enhancer location on Hin invertasome assembly. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[55]  K. Schulten,et al.  Structural dynamics of the lac repressor-DNA complex revealed by a multiscale simulation. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[56]  R. Cheong,et al.  Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer over ∼130 Basepairs in Hyperstable Lac Repressor-DNA Loops , 2003 .

[57]  N. Cozzarelli,et al.  The helical repeat of double-stranded DNA varies as a function of catenation and supercoiling , 1988, Nature.

[58]  J. Kahn,et al.  Designed hyperstable Lac repressor.DNA loop topologies suggest alternative loop geometries. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[59]  J. Schellman,et al.  Flexibility of DNA , 1974, Biopolymers.

[60]  Rachel Millin,et al.  DNA looping by two-site restriction endonucleases: heterogeneous probability distributions for loop size and unbinding force , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[61]  J. Wang,et al.  Supercoiling of the DNA template during transcription. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[62]  David Swigon,et al.  Modeling the Lac repressor-operator assembly: the influence of DNA looping on Lac repressor conformation. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[63]  G. Ruben,et al.  Conformation of Lac repressor tetramer in solution, bound and unbound to operator DNA , 1997, Microscopy research and technique.

[64]  G. Chang,et al.  Crystal Structure of the Lactose Operon Repressor and Its Complexes with DNA and Inducer , 1996, Science.

[65]  R. Schleif,et al.  DNA looping. , 1988, Science.

[66]  B. Müller-Hill,et al.  Quality and position of the three lac operators of E. coli define efficiency of repression. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[67]  J. Vilar,et al.  In vivo evidence of alternative loop geometries in DNA-protein complexes , 2006, q-bio/0602012.

[68]  X. Xie,et al.  Probing Gene Expression in Live Cells, One Protein Molecule at a Time , 2006, Science.

[69]  J. Kahn,et al.  Bacterial repression loops require enhanced DNA flexibility. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[70]  Cees Dekker,et al.  Dual architectural roles of HU: formation of flexible hinges and rigid filaments. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[71]  The mechanism of CAP-lac repressor binding cooperativity at the E. coli lactose promoter. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.