e-PTFE as scleral buckling episcleral implants: an experimental and histopathologic study.

To investigate the effects of focal implantation of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) episcleral implants (i.e., explants or exoplants) on surrounding ocular tissues, an experimental and histopathological study was performed. Twenty-seven Fauve de Bourgogne rabbits eyes were implanted for a period of 3-11 months with oval-shaped e-PTFE episcleral implants. A newly formed capsule constantly encased the implants. Affected by the only two severe complications observed, 2 eyes had an endocapsular acute inflammation and could not be included in the study. Finally, 25 eyes were studied histopathologically. Neither intrusion nor extrusion of episcleral implants was observed. Other changes were related to implant characteristics. The inner surface of the capsule was often covered with numerous giant cells attesting to a foreign-body granuloma developed against the irregular outline of the episcleral implants. The porosity of the material was closely related to its surface irregularity, and also allowed its colonization by a fibrovascular and inflammatory tissue mainly in its peripheral layers. Under episcleral implants, sclera was both thinned and invaginated. Expanded PTFE hydrophobia was the other factor that might have suscitated granuloma. These microscopic changes are in contrast with an overall good apparent experimental tolerance to the material. However, additional studies on the long term behavior of this material would be helpful.

[1]  Y Pouliquen,et al.  Expanded fluorocarbon for keratoprosthesis cellular ingrowth and transparency. , 1994, Experimental eye research.

[2]  J D Andrade,et al.  The foreign body reaction: a chronic inflammatory response. , 1974, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[3]  R. Michels,et al.  SCLERAL BUCKLING METHODS FOR RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT , 1986, Retina.

[4]  M. Refojo,et al.  HYDROGEL IMPLANT FOR SCLERAL BUCKLING: Long-term Observations , 1985, Retina.

[5]  J. Bellón,et al.  Similarity in behavior of polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) prostheses implanted into different interfaces. , 1996, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[6]  E. Owen,et al.  Neo‐endothelialisation of PTFE microvascular grafts: A five‐year experience , 1995, Microsurgery.

[7]  M. Refojo,et al.  HYDROPHILIC ACRYLATE SCLERAL BUCKLING IMPLANTS IN RABBITS: Long-term Clinicopathologic Observations , 1983 .

[8]  F I Tolentino,et al.  A HYDROPHILIC ACRYLATE IMPLANT FOR SCLERAL BUCKLING: Technique and Clinical Experience , 1981, Retina.

[9]  C. Maas,et al.  Biomechanical Effects of e‐PTFE Implant Structure on Soft Tissue Implantation Stability: A Study in the Porcine Model , 1997, The Laryngoscope.

[10]  C L Schepens,et al.  Scleral implants: an historical perspective. , 1991, Survey of ophthalmology.

[11]  C. W. Cummings,et al.  Comparison of Soft Tissue Response in Rabbits following Laryngeal Implantation with Hydroxylapatite, Silicone Rubber, and Teflon , 1997, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[12]  David J. Wilson,et al.  Histopathologic study of the effect of retinal detachment surgery on 49 eyes obtained post mortem. , 1987, American journal of ophthalmology.

[13]  C. Barr.  THE HISTOPATHOLOGY OF SUCCESSFUL RETINAL REATTACHMENT , 1990, Retina.

[14]  A. Behar,et al.  HISTOPATHOLOGIC FINDINGS FOLLOWING SCLERAL BUCKLING IN AN EYE 18 DAYS AFTER A CIRCLING-BUCKLING OPERATION WITH POLYETHYLENE TUBE WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO THE AREA WHERE THE POLYETHYLENE TUBE INDENTED UNRESECTED AND UNDIATHERMIZED SCLERA. , 1964, American journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  C. Nathan,et al.  Secretory products of macrophages. , 1987, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[16]  L. D’Urso,et al.  Polytetrafluoroethylene giant granuloma and adenopathy: long-term complications following subureteral polytetrafluoroethylene injection for the treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in children. , 1997, The Journal of urology.

[17]  J. Korobelnik,et al.  MIRAGEL VERSUS SILASTIC USED AS EPISCLERAL IMPLANTS IN RABBITS; An Experimental and Histopathologic Comparative Study , 1995, Retina.

[18]  A. Gown,et al.  Mechanisms of arterial graft failure. 1. Role of cellular proliferation in early healing of PTFE prostheses. , 1985, The American journal of pathology.

[19]  M. McDonald,et al.  Synthetic scleral reinforcement materials: I. Development and in vivo tissue biocompatibility response. , 1994, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[20]  N. Ziats,et al.  In vitro and in vivo interactions of cells with biomaterials. , 1988, Biomaterials.

[21]  G A Ksander,et al.  STUDY OF ENCAPSULATION OF SILICONE RUBBER IMPLANTS IN ANIMALS A Foreign‐Body Reaction , 1978, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[22]  F I Tolentino,et al.  Long-term complications of the MAI hydrogel intrascleral buckling implant. , 1992, Archives of ophthalmology.

[23]  P G Rehkopf,et al.  Polytetrafluoroethylene in experimental retinal detachment surgery. , 1981, Annals of ophthalmology.

[24]  M. Refojo,et al.  Poly(methyl acrylate-co-hydroxyethyl acrylate) hydrogel implant material of strength and softness. , 1981, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[25]  J. Faulborn,et al.  Gewebereaktionen auf Plomben- und Cerclagematerial: Polyamid — Silikon — Polyester , 2006, Albrecht von Graefes Archiv für klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie.

[26]  A DELLAPORTA,et al.  Experimental studies on a scleral buckling operation. , 1956, American journal of ophthalmology.

[27]  Y Pouliquen,et al.  Encapsulation of scleral buckling materials. A study of sixty specimens. , 1998, Ophthalmology.

[28]  R. Fabian,et al.  Perithyroid Teflon Granuloma Mimicking a Thyroid Nodule , 1995, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.