Correcting inaccurate metaperceptions reduces Americans’ support for partisan violence

Significance Prominent events, such as the 2021 US Capitol attack, have brought politically motivated violence to the forefront of Americans’ minds. Yet, the causes of support for partisan violence remain poorly understood. Across four studies, we found evidence that exaggerated perceptions of rival partisans’ support for violence are a major cause of partisans’ own support for partisan violence. Further, correcting these false beliefs reduces partisans’ support for and willingness to engage in violence, especially among those with the largest misperceptions, and this effect endured for 1 mo. These findings suggest that a simple correction of partisans’ misperceptions could be a practical and scalable way to durably reduce Americans’ support for, and intentions to engage in, partisan violence.

[1]  James N. Druckman,et al.  (Mis)estimating Affective Polarization , 2021, The Journal of Politics.

[2]  M. Petersen,et al.  The Psychological Burden of the COVID-19 Pandemic Is Associated With Antisystemic Attitudes and Political Violence , 2021, Psychological science.

[3]  Michelle I. Seelig,et al.  American Politics in Two Dimensions: Partisan and Ideological Identities versus Anti‐Establishment Orientations , 2021, American Journal of Political Science.

[4]  S. van der Linden,et al.  Out-group animosity drives engagement on social media , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  B. Nyhan,et al.  Elite rhetoric can undermine democratic norms , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  David G. Rand,et al.  Interventions Reducing Affective Polarization Do Not Improve Anti-Democratic Attitudes , 2021 .

[7]  Leor Zmigrod,et al.  Cognition and Emotion in Extreme Political Action: Individual Differences and Dynamic Interactions , 2021, Current Directions in Psychological Science.

[8]  Sandra J. Geiger,et al.  The general fault in our fault lines , 2020, Nature Human Behaviour.

[9]  E. Peterson,et al.  When Unfamiliarity Breeds Contempt: How Partisan Selective Exposure Sustains Oppositional Media Hostility , 2019, American Political Science Review.

[10]  David E. Broockman,et al.  Does Affective Polarization Undermine Democratic Norms or Accountability? Maybe Not , 2020, American Journal of Political Science.

[11]  David G. Rand,et al.  Political sectarianism in America , 2020, Science.

[12]  Anne E Wilson,et al.  Polarization in the contemporary political and media landscape , 2020, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.

[13]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Ideologies that justify political violence , 2020, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.

[14]  Emile G. Bruneau,et al.  Exaggerated meta-perceptions predict intergroup hostility between American political partisans , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Yanna Krupnikov,et al.  How Transparency Affects Survey Responses , 2019, Public Opinion Quarterly.

[16]  M. Cikara,et al.  Inaccurate group meta-perceptions drive negative out-group attributions in competitive contexts , 2019, Nature Human Behaviour.

[17]  Thomas J. Leeper,et al.  Generalizability of heterogeneous treatment effect estimates across samples , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Miles T. Armaly,et al.  The Differential Effects of Actual and Perceived Polarization , 2018, Political Behavior.

[19]  G. Sood,et al.  The Parties in Our Heads: Misperceptions about Party Composition and Their Consequences , 2018, The Journal of Politics.

[20]  Emile G. Bruneau,et al.  Backlash: The Politics and Real-World Consequences of Minority Group Dehumanization. , 2017, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[21]  Neil Malhotra,et al.  Does Media Coverage of Partisan Polarization Affect Political Attitudes? , 2016 .

[22]  Emile G. Bruneau,et al.  They see us as less than human: Metadehumanization predicts intergroup conflict via reciprocal dehumanization. , 2016, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  Thomas J. Leeper,et al.  The Generalizability of Survey Experiments* , 2015, Journal of Experimental Political Science.

[24]  Leaf Van Boven,et al.  Perceiving Political Polarization in the United States , 2015, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[25]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[26]  Cindy D. Kam,et al.  Students as Experimental Participants: A Defense of the "Narrow Data Base" (WP-09-05) , 2009 .

[27]  John R. Chambers,et al.  Why Do I Hate Thee? Conflict Misperceptions and Intergroup Mistrust , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[28]  J. Krueger,et al.  Social Projection to Ingroups and Outgroups: A Review and Meta-Analysis , 2005, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[29]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  The context and content of social identity threat , 1999 .

[30]  M. Hewstone,et al.  Social Identity Theory's Self-Esteem Hypothesis: A Review and Some Suggestions for Clarification , 1998, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[31]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .