CAD of osteoporosis in vertebrae using dual-energy CT

The assessment of bone mineral density (BMD) in vertebrae is critical for the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Recent developments in dual-source CT allow for the simultaneous acquisition of two image data sets with different X-ray tube energies — dual-energy CT (DECT). We present a comprehensive approach for assessing the density of the trabecular bone in vertebrae of the spine based on DECT image data. For this, we apply and combine methods from different areas: the deformation of a template mesh for delineating the structures of interest, a biophysical model of the trabecular bone for the computation of BMD values, and different visualization approaches for the display of the results. In addition, we investigate the correlation between the computed BMD values with concurrently measured pull-out forces for pedicle screws. We show that there is a linear correlation between both measures and thus, DECT provides correct BMD values for the trabecular bone. We conclude that our approach enables the radiologist to diagnose osteoporosis based on DECT image data which has the potential to replace the current gold standard dual-energy X-ray absorp-tiometry.

[1]  Bernhard Preim,et al.  Visualization in Medicine: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications , 2007 .

[2]  K. Stierstorfer,et al.  First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system , 2006, European Radiology.

[3]  G. Blake,et al.  The clinical role of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[4]  K. Stierstorfer,et al.  First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system , 2006, European Radiology.

[5]  Z. Syed,et al.  Bone densitometry: applications and limitations. , 2002, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC.

[6]  M. Cerqueira,et al.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. , 2002, Circulation.

[7]  Judith E. Adams,et al.  Quantitative computed tomography. , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[8]  W. Kalender,et al.  Evaluation of a prototype dual-energy computed tomographic apparatus. I. Phantom studies. , 1986, Medical physics.

[9]  M. Reiser,et al.  Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience , 2007, European Radiology.

[10]  Gabriele Armbrecht,et al.  Clinical use of quantitative computed tomography and peripheral quantitative computed tomography in the management of osteoporosis in adults: the 2007 ISCD Official Positions. , 2008, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[11]  Glenn R. Paskoff,et al.  Trabecular bone density of male human cervical and lumbar vertebrae. , 2006, Bone.

[12]  Richard A. Robb,et al.  Dual energy CT: How to best blend both energies in one fused image? , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[13]  Stefan Wesarg,et al.  Simultaneous Segmentation and Correspondence Establishment for Statistical Shape Models , 2009, 3DPH.

[14]  A. Singer.  Osteoporosis diagnosis and screening. , 2006, Clinical cornerstone.

[15]  James N. Kremer,et al.  Applications and Limitations , 1978 .

[16]  C. Kuijk.  Evaluation of postprocessing dual-energy quantitative computed tomography , 1991 .

[17]  E L Nickoloff,et al.  Bone mineral assessment: new dual-energy CT approach. , 1988, Radiology.

[18]  M. Cerqueira,et al.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association , 2002, The international journal of cardiovascular imaging.