Biological indicators of stream health using macroinvertebrate assemblage composition: a comparison of sensitivity to an urban gradient

Biological indicators are increasingly being used as integrative measures of ecosystem health in streams, particularly indicators using macroinvertebrate assemblage composition. Several indicators of this type have been advocated, including biotic indices based on taxa sensitivities, richness indices and ratios of observed to expected taxa from models predicting assemblage composition in streams with little human impact (O/E scores). The present study aimed to compare the sensitivity of indicators of each of these types (all used for legislated objectives for stream protection in Victoria, Australia) to a gradient of urban disturbance in 16 streams in a small area in eastern Melbourne. The biotic index SIGNAL and number of Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera or Trichoptera families were the most sensitive indicators, whereas total number of families and O/E scores from Australian river assessment system (AUSRIVAS) models were least sensitive. Differences in sensitivity were not the result of sampling or taxonomic inadequacies. AUSRIVAS and similar models might be improved by using only predictor variables that are not affected by human impacts and by sounder approaches to model selection. Insensitivities of indicators and misclassification of sites by the Victorian objectives show that assessment of indicators against disturbance gradients is critical for setting management objectives based on biological indicators.

[1]  N. LeRoy Poff,et al.  Landscape Filters and Species Traits: Towards Mechanistic Understanding and Prediction in Stream Ecology , 1997, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[2]  B. Chessman,et al.  New sensitivity grades for Australian river macroinvertebrates , 2003 .

[3]  G. Quinn,et al.  Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists , 2002 .

[4]  David R. B. Stockwell,et al.  ANNA: A new prediction method for bioassessment programs , 2005 .

[5]  A Wilander,et al.  Regional scale evidence for improvements in surface water chemistry 1990-2001. , 2005, Environmental pollution.

[6]  C. Townsend,et al.  Scale and the detection of land-use effects on morphology, vegetation and macroinvertebrate communities of grassland streams , 2004 .

[7]  J. Wright,et al.  An introduction to RIVPACS. , 2000 .

[8]  J. Wright,et al.  Derivation of a biological quality index for river sites: Comparison of the observed with the expected fauna , 1996 .

[9]  Mike T. Furse,et al.  Biological assessment of river quality: development of AUSRIVAS models and outputs. , 2000 .

[10]  B. Chessman,et al.  Rapid assessment of rivers using macroinvertebrates: A procedure based on habitat‐specific sampling, family level identification and a biotic index , 1995 .

[11]  Jeffrey D. Ostermiller,et al.  Effects of sampling error on bioassessments of stream ecosystems: application to RIVPACS-type models , 2004, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[12]  S. Roberts,et al.  Catchment urbanisation and increased benthic algal biomass in streams: linking mechanisms to management , 2004 .

[13]  K. R. Clarke,et al.  Change in marine communities : an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation , 2001 .

[14]  B. Chessman,et al.  Rapid assessment of rivers using macroinvertebrates: the role of experience, and comparisons with quantitative methods , 2003, Hydrobiologia.

[15]  Barry T. Hart,et al.  New generation water quality guidelines for ecosystem protection , 1999 .

[16]  J. Karr.  Defining and measuring river health , 1999 .

[17]  R. Norris,et al.  What is river health , 1999 .

[18]  Jerald B. Johnson,et al.  Model selection in ecology and evolution. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[19]  Marjorie Jean Holmes,et al.  The government of Victoria , 1976 .

[20]  G. De’ath.  PRINCIPAL CURVES: A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR INDIRECT AND DIRECT GRADIENT ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[21]  Tim D. Fletcher,et al.  Stream restoration in urban catchments through redesigning stormwater systems: looking to the catchment to save the stream , 2005, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[22]  V. Flack,et al.  Frequency of Selecting Noise Variables in Subset Regression Analysis: A Simulation Study , 1987 .

[23]  P. Mulholland,et al.  Carbon Dioxide Variation in a Hardwood Forest Stream: An Integrative Measure of Whole Catchment Soil Respiration , 1998, Ecosystems.

[24]  R. M. Nally.  Regression and model-building in conservation biology, biogeography and ecology: The distinction between – and reconciliation of – ‘predictive’ and ‘explanatory’ models , 2000, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[25]  B. Chessman,et al.  PREDICTING DIATOM COMMUNITIES AT THE GENUS LEVEL FOR THE RAPID BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF RIVERS , 1999 .

[26]  P. Newall,et al.  Response of epilithic diatom assemblages to urbanization influences , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[27]  M. Graham.  CONFRONTING MULTICOLLINEARITY IN ECOLOGICAL MULTIPLE REGRESSION , 2003 .

[28]  J. Meyer.  Stream Health: Incorporating the Human Dimension to Advance Stream Ecology , 1997, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[29]  J. Karr.  Biological Integrity: A Long-Neglected Aspect of Water Resource Management. , 1991, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[30]  B. Chessman,et al.  Bioassessment without reference sites: use of environmental filters to predict natural assemblages of river macroinvertebrates , 2004, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[31]  Wayne S. Davis,et al.  Biological assessment and criteria : tools for water resource planning and decision making , 1995 .

[32]  R. Death,et al.  Biological assessment of rivers in the Manawatu‐Wanganui region of New Zealand using a predictive macroinvertebrate model , 2003 .

[33]  Richard H. Norris,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF PREDICTIVE MODELS FOR MEASURING THE BIOLOGICAL INTEGRITY OF STREAMS , 2000 .

[34]  C. Humphrey,et al.  AUSRIVAS: operator sample processing errors and temporal variability - implications for model sensitivity , 2000 .

[35]  M. Grace,et al.  Extracellular enzyme response to bioavailability of dissolved organic C in streams of varying catchment urbanization , 2005, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[36]  Mike T. Furse,et al.  RIVPACS models for predicting the expected macroinvertebrate fauna and assessing the ecological quality of rivers , 2003 .

[37]  Linda J. Stafford,et al.  The Impact of Airport Deicing Runoff on Water Quality and Aquatic Life in a Pennsylvania Stream , 1998 .

[38]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[39]  C. J. Walsh.  Protection of in-stream biota from urban impacts: minimise catchment imperviousness or improve drainage design? , 2004 .

[40]  Mike T. Furse,et al.  A preliminary classification of running‐water sites in Great Britain based on macro‐invertebrate species and the prediction of community type using environmental data , 1984 .

[41]  C. J. Walsh.  A multivariate method for determining optimal subsample size in the analysis of macroinvertebrate samples , 1997 .

[42]  J. Karr,et al.  Restoring life in running waters : better biological monitoring , 1998 .

[43]  Predicting the macroinvertebrate faunas of rivers by multiple regression of biological and environmental differences , 1999 .

[44]  B. Chessman,et al.  Objective derivation of macroinvertebrate family sensitivity grade numbers for the SIGNAL biotic index: Application to the Hunter River system, New South Wales , 1997 .

[45]  L. Metzeling,et al.  Macroinvertebrate Regionalisation for use in the Management of Aquatic Ecosystems in Victoria, Australia , 2002, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[46]  R. Neller.  Induced channel enlargement in small urban catchments, Armidale, New South Wales , 1989 .

[47]  Peter Davies,et al.  Development of a national river bioassessment system (AUSRIVAS) in Australia. , 2000 .

[48]  R. Norris,et al.  Classification and Prediction of Macroinvertebrate Assemblages from Running Waters in Victoria, Australia , 1997, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[49]  Stuart E. Bunn,et al.  Biological processes in running waters and their implications for the assessment of ecological integrity , 2000, Hydrobiologia.

[50]  Charles E. McCulloch,et al.  MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS IN ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS: PANACEA OR PANDORA'S BOX? , 1990 .

[51]  Tim D Fletcher,et al.  The Influence of Urban Density and Drainage Infrastructure on the Concentrations and Loads of Pollutants in Small Streams , 2004, Environmental management.

[52]  R. Norris,et al.  Relationship of AUSRIVAS-based macroinvertebrate predictive model outputs to a metal pollution gradient , 2003, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.