Current trends in Smart City initiatives: some stylised facts

The concept of Smart City (SC) as a means to enhance the life quality of citizen has been gaining increasing importance in the agendas of policy makers. However, a shared definition of SC is not available and it is hard to identify common global trends. This paper provides with a comprehensive understanding of the notion of SC through the elaboration of a taxonomy of pertinent application domains, namely: natural resources and energy, transport and mobility, buildings, living, government, and economy and people. It also explores the diffusion of smart initiatives via an empirical study aimed at investigating the ratio of domains covered by a city’s best practices to the total of potential domains of smart initiatives and at understanding the role that various economic, urban, demographic, and geographical variables might have in influencing the planning approach to create a smarter city. Results reveal that the evolution patterns of a SC highly depend on its local context factors. In particular, economic development and structural urban variables are likely to influence a city’s digital path, the geographical location to affect the SC strategy, and density of population, with its associated congestion problems, might an important component to determine the routes for the SC implementation. This work provides policy makers and city managers with useful guidelines to define and drive their SC strategy and planning actions towards the most appropriate domains of implementation.

[1]  J. Wareham,et al.  A Smart City Initiative: the Case of Barcelona , 2012, Journal of the Knowledge Economy.

[2]  J. Manyika Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity , 2011 .

[3]  C. Harrison,et al.  A Theory of Smart Cities , 2011 .

[4]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Big data: the management revolution. , 2012, Harvard business review.

[5]  Geetam Tiwari,et al.  Sustainable transport and the modernisation of urban transport in Delhi and Stockholm , 2010 .

[6]  C.Y. Jim,et al.  Socioeconomic effect on perception of urban green spaces in Guangzhou, China , 2013 .

[7]  A. Mahizhnan Smart cities: The Singapore case , 1999 .

[8]  R. Paddison Triumph of the City , 2012 .

[9]  Tan Yigitcanlar,et al.  Benchmarking knowledge-based urban development performance : Results from the international comparison of Helsinki , 2013 .

[10]  R. Hollands Will the real smart city please stand up? , 2008, The Routledge Companion to Smart Cities.

[11]  Myung-Jin Jun,et al.  The effects of high-density suburban development on commuter mode choices in Seoul, Korea , 2013 .

[12]  E. Glaeser,et al.  Urban Resurgence and the Consumer City , 2006 .

[13]  Jayant Kalagnanam,et al.  Foundations for Smarter Cities , 2010, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[14]  Laurie Kaye Nijaki,et al.  Procurement for sustainable local economic development , 2012 .

[15]  Bruno Amable,et al.  The Lisbon Agenda , 2007 .

[16]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  Smart Cities in Europe , 2011 .

[17]  R. E. Hall,et al.  VISION OF A SMART CITY , 2000 .

[18]  Willem van Winden,et al.  European Cities in the Knowledge Economy: Towards a Typology , 2007 .

[19]  Matthew E. Kahn,et al.  The Greenness of China: Household Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Urban Development , 2009 .

[20]  James C. Cramer,et al.  Population growth and air quality in California , 1998, Demography.

[21]  Bharat Dahiya,et al.  Cities in Asia, 2012: Demographics, economics, poverty, environment and governance , 2012 .

[22]  S. D. S. Salazar,et al.  Estimating the non-market benefits of an urban park: Does proximity matter? , 2007 .

[23]  Melissa Guimaraes Castello Brazilian policies on climate change: The missing link to cities☆ , 2011 .

[24]  Deirdre Oakley,et al.  Socioeconomic gains and spillover effects of geographically targeted initiatives to combat economic distress: An examination of Chicago’s Empowerment Zone , 2007 .

[25]  Lida Xu,et al.  The internet of things: a survey , 2014, Information Systems Frontiers.

[26]  Patrice Rios,et al.  Creating "The Smart City" , 2012 .

[27]  Lee Schipper,et al.  Driving CO2 reduction by Integrating Transport and Urban Design strategies , 2011 .

[28]  P. Cheshire,et al.  Population growth in European cities: Weather matters – but only nationally , 2006 .

[29]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions , 2011, dg.o '11.

[30]  Matteo Ignaccolo,et al.  The density dilemma. A proposal for introducing smart growth principles in a sprawling settlement within Catania Metropolitan Area , 2011 .

[31]  Dionysia Lambiri,et al.  Quality of Life in the Economic and Urban Economic Literature , 2007 .

[32]  Erich J. Neuhold,et al.  Information and communication technology , 2007, 2007 International Forum on Strategic Technology.

[33]  Parbir S. Grewal,et al.  Can cities become self-reliant in energy? A technological scenario analysis for Cleveland, Ohio , 2013 .

[34]  Nancy Odendaal,et al.  Information and communication technology and local governance: understanding the difference between cities in developed and emerging economies , 2003, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[35]  Luis Onieva,et al.  Solutions applicable by local administrations for urban logistics , 2005 .

[36]  Roberto Verganti,et al.  The contribution of Technology Epiphanies in the development of Smart Cities: innovative solutions supporting the mobility in the city environment , 2012 .

[37]  Ivan Marsá-Maestre,et al.  Mobile Agents for Service Personalization in Smart Environments , 2008, J. Networks.

[38]  A. Shi,et al.  The impact of population pressure on global carbon dioxide emissions, 1975-1996: evidence from pooled cross-country data , 2003 .

[39]  Cliff T. Bekar,et al.  General purpose technologies , 2013 .

[40]  Ugur Yavas,et al.  Improving quality of life in a region , 2001 .

[41]  Joel A. Elvery City size and skill intensity , 2010 .

[42]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Understanding Smart Cities: An Integrative Framework , 2012, HICSS.

[43]  Masayuki Sasaki,et al.  Urban regeneration through cultural creativity and social inclusion: Rethinking creative city theory through a Japanese case study , 2010 .

[44]  Charlie Karlsson,et al.  THE LISBON AGENDA FROM 2000 TO 2010 , 2007 .

[45]  Ko-Wan Tsou,et al.  The effect of multiple urban network structures on retail patterns - A case study in Taipei, Taiwan , 2013 .

[46]  Vítor Leal,et al.  Smart Cities Initiative: how to foster a quick transition towards local sustainable energy systems , 2010 .

[47]  R. Kanter,et al.  Informed and Interconnected: A Manifesto for Smarter Cities , 2009 .

[48]  Peter Hills,et al.  World cities or great cities? A comparative study of five Asian metropolises , 2003 .

[49]  Stephanie Pincetl,et al.  Triple exposure: Regulatory, climatic, and political drivers of water management changes in the city of Los Angeles , 2013 .

[50]  Tamara Kulesa A Vision of Smarter Cities : How Cities Can Lead the Way into a Prosperous and Sustainable Future Moderator : , 2009 .

[51]  Timothy F. Bresnahan,et al.  General Purpose Technologies "Engines of Growth?" , 1992 .

[52]  Helen L. Partridge Developing a human perspective to the digital divide in the 'smart city' , 2004 .

[53]  Sohail Inayatullah,et al.  City futures in transformation: Emerging issues and case studies , 2011 .

[54]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Building Understanding of Smart City Initiatives , 2012, EGOV.

[55]  James R. Beniger The Control Revolution: Technological and Economic Origins of the Information Society , 1986 .

[56]  Hyung Min Kim,et al.  City profile Seoul , 2012 .

[57]  W. F. Lever Correlating the Knowledge-base of Cities with Economic Growth , 2002 .

[58]  Gregory M. P. O'Hare,et al.  How Smart Is Your City? , 2012, Science.

[59]  Anthony Debons,et al.  The control revolution: Technological and economic origins of the information society , 1990, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..