Quantitative polymerase chain reaction: a framework for improving the quality of results and estimating uncertainty of measurement

International comparability of quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) measurement results is critical for applied fields within industry, healthcare and forensics and may be achieved through traceability to the International System of Units, the SI. This process requires determining the accuracy of the quantitative result by estimation of the measurement uncertainty (MU). Here we present a relatively simple process for estimating MU for quantitative DNA measurements produced by qPCR. A worked example is given in which the qPCR method has been divided into four parts: DNA extraction; preparation of calibration curves; qPCR set-up and data analysis. A framework is provided in comprehensive tables that allow the identification of most potential sources of variation and bias. We show that each source can be either eliminated from the measurement process or captured in the MU data. The necessary data for MU estimation are relatively easy to gather but the combined uncertainty is only representative if all sources of variation have been incorporated. Although qPCR is given as an example, the principles apply to other nucleic acid measurements.

[1]  G. Turk,et al.  Potential primary measurement tool for the quantification of DNA. , 2009, Analytical chemistry.

[2]  F. Smulders,et al.  Real-time PCR method with statistical analysis to compare the potential of DNA isolation methods to remove PCR inhibitors from samples for diagnostic PCR. , 2007, Molecular and cellular probes.

[3]  P. Corbisier,et al.  Toward metrological traceability for DNA fragment ratios in GM quantification. 2. Systematic study of parameters influencing the quantitative determination of MON 810 corn by real-time PCR. , 2007, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[4]  Paul De Bièvre A metrological traceability chain prevents circular reasoning in measurement design , 2010 .

[5]  G Ronald Jenkins,et al.  Influence of DNA extraction methods, PCR inhibitors and quantification methods on real-time PCR assay of biotechnology-derived traits , 2010, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[6]  Philippe Corbisier,et al.  Single molecule detection in nanofluidic digital array enables accurate measurement of DNA copy number , 2009, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[7]  M. Holden,et al.  Traceable phosphorus measurements by ICP-OES and HPLC for the quantitation of DNA. , 2007, Analytical chemistry.

[8]  Stephen A Bustin,et al.  Real-time, fluorescence-based quantitative PCR: a snapshot of current procedures and preferences , 2005, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[9]  Marc De Loose,et al.  Trends in quality in the analytical laboratory. II. Analytical method validation and quality assurance , 2004 .

[10]  T. Cvitaš,et al.  Quantities describing compositions of mixtures , 1996 .

[11]  Christoph von Holst,et al.  Novel approach for interlaboratory transfer of real-time PCR methods: detecting bovine meat and bone meal in feed , 2009, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[12]  Marc De Loose,et al.  Trends in quality in the analytical laboratory. I. Traceability and measurement uncertainty of analytical results , 2004 .

[13]  A. Moorman,et al.  Assumption-free analysis of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) data , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[14]  Alimuddin Zumla,et al.  Differential susceptibility of PCR reactions to inhibitors: an important and unrecognised phenomenon , 2008, BMC Research Notes.

[15]  K. Gruden,et al.  Method Validation and Quality Management in the Flexible Scope of Accreditation: An Example of Laboratories Testing for Genetically Modified Organisms , 2008 .

[16]  P. Corbisier,et al.  Absolute quantification of genetically modified MON810 maize (Zea mays L.) by digital polymerase chain reaction , 2010, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[17]  Weihong Liu,et al.  Validation of a quantitative method for real time PCR kinetics. , 2002, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[18]  Bertil Magnusson,et al.  Treatment of uncorrected measurement bias in uncertainty estimation for chemical measurements , 2008, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[19]  P. Borer,et al.  Revised UV extinction coefficients for nucleoside-5'-monophosphates and unpaired DNA and RNA. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[20]  Inchul Yang,et al.  Performance evaluation of thermal cyclers for PCR in a rapid cycling condition. , 2008, BioTechniques.

[21]  C. Georgiou,et al.  Protocol for the quantitative assessment of DNA concentration and damage (fragmentation and nicks) , 2009, Nature Protocols.

[22]  Lynne I Forster Measurement uncertainty in microbiology. , 2003, Journal of AOAC International.

[23]  Graham Roberts,et al.  Calculating uncertainty of measurement for serology assays by use of precision and bias. , 2006, Clinical chemistry.

[24]  Y. Wang,et al.  Degradation of endogenous and exogenous genes of roundup-ready soybean during food processing. , 2005, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[25]  Max Robertson,et al.  APLAC interpretation and guidance on the estimation of uncertainty of measurement in testing. , 2003, Journal of AOAC International.

[26]  P. Robinson,et al.  PIN-G – A novel reporter for imaging and defining the effects of trafficking signals in membrane proteins , 2006, BMC biotechnology.

[27]  B. Süss,et al.  Studying the effect of single mismatches in primer and probe binding regions on amplification curves and quantification in real-time PCR. , 2009, Journal of microbiological methods.

[28]  Yong You,et al.  Predicting ultraviolet spectrum of single stranded and double stranded deoxyribonucleic acids. , 2008, Biophysical chemistry.

[29]  A. Orpana,et al.  Accuracy in amplification , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[30]  Lyndsey Birch,et al.  Essentials of nucleic acid analysis : a robust approach , 2008 .

[31]  M. Holden,et al.  Factors affecting quantification of total DNA by UV spectroscopy and PicoGreen fluorescence. , 2009, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[32]  Dagmar Schoder,et al.  Physical characteristics of six new thermocyclers. , 2003, Clinical chemistry.

[33]  V. Barwick,et al.  Achieving metrological traceability in chemical and bioanalytical measurement , 2010 .

[34]  Tanja Dreo,et al.  Critical points of DNA quantification by real-time PCR--effects of DNA extraction method and sample matrix on quantification of genetically modified organisms. , 2006, BMC biotechnology.

[35]  Kerry R Emslie,et al.  Comparison of methods for accurate quantification of DNA mass concentration with traceability to the international system of units. , 2010, Analytical chemistry.

[36]  Michael W Pfaffl,et al.  RNA integrity and the effect on the real-time qRT-PCR performance. , 2006, Molecular aspects of medicine.

[37]  Hendrik Emons,et al.  Towards future reference systems for GM analysis , 2010, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[38]  Hendrik Emons,et al.  The ‘RM family’—Identification of all of its members , 2006 .

[39]  G. Berben,et al.  Real-time polymerase chain reaction approach for quantitation of ruminant-specific DNA to indicate a correlation between DNA amount and meat and bone meal heat treatments. , 2005, Journal of AOAC International.

[40]  B. Gilpin,et al.  Evaluation of uncertainty in quantitative real-time PCR. , 2006, Journal of microbiological methods.

[41]  Bertil Magnusson,et al.  Handbook for Calculation of Measurement Uncertainty in Environmental Laboratories Version 3 January 2008 , 2003 .

[42]  V. Beneš,et al.  The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. , 2009, Clinical chemistry.

[43]  Tania Nolan,et al.  Quantification of mRNA using real-time RT-PCR , 2006, Nature Protocols.

[44]  S. Walker,et al.  Quantitative RT-PCR : Pitfalls and Potential , 1999 .

[45]  J. Doležel,et al.  Nuclear DNA content and genome size of trout and human. , 2003, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[46]  M. Holden,et al.  Comparison of fluorometric and spectrophotometric DNA quantification for real-time quantitative PCR of degraded DNA , 2009 .

[47]  Russell G Foster,et al.  Experimental validation of novel and conventional approaches to quantitative real-time PCR data analysis. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[48]  Tania Nolan,et al.  SPUD: a quantitative PCR assay for the detection of inhibitors in nucleic acid preparations. , 2006, Analytical biochemistry.

[49]  Sabrina Gioria,et al.  Toward metrological traceability for DNA fragment ratios in GM quantification. 1. Effect of DNA extraction methods on the quantitative determination of Bt176 corn by real-time PCR. , 2007, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[50]  S. Merson,et al.  Use of elemental analysis to determine comparative performance of established DNA quantification methods. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.