Hybrid Design for Aircraft Wind-Tunnel Testing Using Response Surface Methodologies

A response surface methodology approach to wind-tunnel testing of high-performance aircraft is being investigated at the Langley Full-Scale Tunnel. An exploratory study was completed using a newly developed response surface methodology design in an effort to better characterize an aircraft's aerodynamic behavior while simultaneously reducing test time. This new design called a "nested face-centered design" was developed when classic designs were found to have inadequate prediction qualities over a cuboidal design space with factors at five levels. A 19% scale modified X-31 aircraft model was chosen for evaluation of the new response surface methodology design based on its nonlinear aerodynamic behavior at high angle of attack that is representative of modern fighter aircraft and due to a substantial preexisting data base. A five-level nested fractional factorial design, augmented with center points and axial points, produced regression models including pure cubic terms for the characteristic aerodynamic forces and moments over a cuboidal design space as a function of model position and control surface deflections. Model adequacy and uncertainty levels were described using robust statistical methods inherent to response surface methodology practice. Comparisons to baseline data and sample lateral-directional and longitudinal aerodynamic characteristics are given as validation of the new design.

[1]  Gary E. Erickson,et al.  Low-Order Response Surface Modeling of Wind Tunnel Data Over Truncated Inference Subspaces , 2003 .

[2]  Daniel W. Banks,et al.  Low-speed longitudinal and lateral-directional aerodynamic characteristics of the X-31 configuration , 1992 .

[3]  Drew Landman,et al.  From the 30 by 60 to the Langley Full Scale Tunnel , 1998 .

[4]  Karen A. F. Copeland Design and Analysis of Experiments, 5th Ed. , 2001 .

[5]  Richard DeLoach MDOE Perspectives on Wind Tunnel Testing Objectives , 2002 .

[6]  Norman R. Draper,et al.  A Third Order Rotatable Design in Four Dimensions , 1960 .

[7]  Drew Landman,et al.  Efficient Methods for Complex Aircraft Configuration Aerodynamic Characterization using Response Surface Methodologies , 2006 .

[8]  Eugene A. Morelli,et al.  Wind Tunnel Database Development using Modern Experiment Design and Multivariate Orthogonal Functions , 2002 .

[9]  Drew Landman,et al.  Use of Designed Experiments in Wind Tunnel Testing of Performance Automobiles , 2002 .

[10]  Arthur Rizzi,et al.  Aerodynamic scaling to free flight conditions : past and present , 2008 .

[11]  Drew Landman,et al.  Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Testing via Designed Experiments: Challenges and Ways Forward , 2008 .

[12]  J. S. Hunter,et al.  Statistics for experimenters : an introduction to design, data analysis, and model building , 1979 .

[13]  Norman R. Draper,et al.  Third Order Rotatable Designs in Three Factors: Analysis' , 1962 .

[14]  Richard DeLoach,et al.  Productivity and Quality Enhancements in a Configuration Aerodynamics Test Using the Modern Design of Experiments , 2004 .