Usability testing of digital pen and paper system in nursing documentation.

Usability testing was used to evaluate whether a new technology, a digital pen and paper system, would be usable for hospital nurses. Twenty-one nurses in a Labor and Delivery unit were randomly assigned into two groups, and a crossover design was used to compare the digital pen and paper system to conventional pens. Data collection included observations, interviews, and a questionnaire. Results showed that nurses had a positive attitude toward the system and could foresee its potential benefits, but they found that in its current design the system had poor usability and interfered with nurses' work practices. Usability testing provided important insight into the needs of nurses and the suitability of this technology. This study is an example of how a user-centered approach can improve our understanding of the real needs of nurses and contribute to the design of useful and usable technologies for healthcare.

[1]  Arild Faxvaag,et al.  Research Paper: Effects of Scanning and Eliminating Paper-based Medical Records on Hospital Physicians' Clinical Work Practice , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[2]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  M Ehnfors,et al.  Nursing process documentation--effects on workload and quality when using a computer program and a key word model for nursing documentation. , 1997, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[4]  Walter H Henricks,et al.  The Utility and Cost Effectiveness of Voice Recognition Technology in Surgical Pathology , 2002, Modern Pathology.

[5]  N Staggers,et al.  Nurse‐Computer Interaction: Staff Performance Outcomes , 1994, Nursing research.

[6]  B. Barr,et al.  Managing change during an information systems transition. , 2002, AORN journal.

[7]  Elske Ammenwerth,et al.  Research Paper: Factors Affecting and Affected by User Acceptance of Computer-based Nursing Documentation: Results of a Two-year Study , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[8]  M Benson,et al.  User acceptance of an anaesthesia information management system , 2003, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[9]  S Graeber Application of clinical workstations: functionality and usability. , 1997, Clinical performance and quality health care.

[10]  Darin J Erickson,et al.  Handheld Computers , 2003, Evaluation review.

[11]  Craig Lanway,et al.  Mobile documentation. Wireless PDAs boost job satisfaction for utilization review nurses. , 2003, Healthcare informatics : the business magazine for information and communication systems.

[12]  J. Coia,et al.  Use of bar code readers and programmable keypads to improve the speed and accuracy of manual data entry in the clinical microbiology laboratory: experience of two laboratories. , 1999, Journal of clinical pathology.

[13]  M T Nolan,et al.  A guide to choosing technology to support the measurement of patient outcomes. , 2000, The Journal of nursing administration.

[14]  D. Allen,et al.  Record-keeping and routine nursing practice: the view from the wards. , 1998, Journal of advanced nursing.