An overview of systems analysis methods in delineating environmental quality indices

Environmental quality indices (EQIs) have been developed for a variety of purposes ranging from enforcement of environmental standards, to analysis of trends of environmental degradation or improvement, to scientific research. EQIs currently in use are not organized within an integrated framework and thus it has been difficult to analyze adequately complex, multidisciplinary, large-scale, global phenomena. In this paper we compare four different approaches to developing EQIs within a systems perspective. Our analysis suggests that: (1) non-linear regression models that represent an ecosystem's response to different impacts within a stress-response framework (method of response functions) are useful tools for analysis of environmental data; (2) non-equilibrium thermodynamics models based on the concept of exergy, which represents the free energy a system possesses in relation to its environment, provide a common basis for representing many aspects of ecosystem development and response to environmental impacts as a single measure; (3) diagram models based on the concept of emergy, which represents both environmental values and economic values with a single measure, provide a common basis for integrating economic development and environmental protection values into one index; and (4) complex systems simulation models based on general systems theory, which use the methodologies of systems analysis and simulation to identify, quantify, and interrelate EQIs within a dynamic systems context, provide explicit linkages between causes and effects (vertical integration) and identify cross-linkages among different environmental issues (horizontal integration).

[1]  E. Odum Fundamentals of ecology , 1972 .

[2]  Michael W. Mehaffy,et al.  At Home In The Universe The Search For The Laws Of Self Organization And Complexity , 1996 .

[3]  James J. Kay,et al.  Thermodynamics and Measures of Ecological Integrity , 1992 .

[4]  D. Meadows Dynamics of Growth in a Finite World , 1974 .

[5]  D. Tingey,et al.  Evaluation of ozone exposure indices in exposure-response modeling. , 1988, Environmental pollution.

[6]  W. Ott Environmental indices: Theory and practice , 1978 .

[7]  J. O. Rawlings,et al.  The Weibull Function as a Dose‐Response Model to Describe Ozone Effects on Crop Yields 1 , 1985 .

[8]  Sven Erik Jørgensen Review and comparison of goal functions in system ecology , 1994 .

[9]  Ervin Laszlo,et al.  The Systems View of the World: A Holistic Vision for Our Time , 1996 .

[10]  Y. Pykh,et al.  The Method of Response Function in Ecology , 2001 .

[11]  B. C. Patten,et al.  Systems Analysis and Simulation in Ecology , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[12]  Justus von Liebig,et al.  Chemistry in Its Application to Agriculture and Physiology , 1842, London and Edinburgh Monthly Journal of Medical Science.

[13]  S. Jørgensen Handbook of Environmental and Ecological Modeling , 1995 .

[14]  D. Meadows,et al.  Beyond the limits: confronting global collapse envisioning a sustainable future. , 1992 .

[15]  Roman Lenz,et al.  Environmental indices systems analysis approach , 1999 .

[16]  Ludwig von Bertalanffy,et al.  General System Theory , 1969 .

[17]  Larry W. Canter,et al.  Handbook of variables for environmental impact assessment , 1979 .

[18]  William E. Grant,et al.  Ecology and Natural Resource Management: Systems Analysis and Simulation , 1997 .

[19]  Günter Ludyk Theorie dynamischer Systeme , 1977 .

[20]  Greef J de,et al.  Global Change and Sustainable Development. A modelling perspective for the next decade , 1994 .

[21]  H. Morowitz,et al.  Energy Flow in Biology , 1969 .

[22]  Sven Erik Jørgensen,et al.  Exergy and Ecology , 1992 .

[23]  Sven Erik Jørgensen,et al.  EXERGY AND ECOLOGICAL BUFFER CAPACITY , 1979 .

[24]  R. Whittaker Communities and Ecosystems , 1975 .