Chronometric evidence for memory retrieval in causal conditional reasoning: The case of the association strength effect

According to many models of conditional reasoning, correct responses to the uncertain forms affirmation of consequent (AC) and denial of antecedent (DA) rely on the retrieval of an alternative antecedent from semantic memory. The main prediction issuing from this hypothesis of online retrieval is that the associative strength of the relevant information in long-term memory affects the latency of its retrieval and then of the correct response of uncertainty to AC and DA. This prediction was tested in 64 adults who performed a syllogism evaluation task with familiar causal conditional premises. As predicted, correct responses of uncertainty to AC and DA were not only more frequent but also faster when the antecedent term was weakly rather than strongly associated with the consequent. In line with the semantic framework, we also observed that this strength effect in response times was reversed for incorrect responses of certainty to AC.

[1]  P. Barrouillet,et al.  Developmental and content effects in reasoning with causal conditionals. , 2002, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[2]  N. Cowan Attention and Memory: An Integrated Framework , 1995 .

[3]  Jonathan Evans,et al.  Human Reasoning: The Psychology Of Deduction , 1993 .

[4]  Henry Markovits,et al.  A mental model analysis of young children's conditional reasoning with meaningful premises , 2000 .

[5]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Rules of the Mind , 1993 .

[6]  Henry Markovits,et al.  The Development of Conditional Reasoning: A Mental Model Account , 2002 .

[7]  Martin D. S. Braine,et al.  Conversational comprehension processes are responsible for reasoning fallacies in children as well as adults: If is not the biconditional. , 1983 .

[8]  R. Engle,et al.  The role of working memory capacity in retrieval. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[9]  G. d'Ydewalle,et al.  Causal conditional reasoning and semantic memory retrieval: A test of the semantic memory framework , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[10]  Denise Dellarosa Cummins,et al.  Naive theories and causal deduction , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[11]  H. Markovits,et al.  Conditional reasoning, representation, and level of abstraction , 1990 .

[12]  Todd Lubart,et al.  Conditional reasoning and causation , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[13]  C. Lebiere,et al.  The Atomic Components of Thought , 1998 .

[14]  M Venet,et al.  The development of conditional reasoning and the structure of semantic memory. , 1998, Child development.

[15]  P. Barrouillet,et al.  How can mental models theory account for content effects in conditional reasoning? A developmental perspective , 1998, Cognition.

[16]  Henry Markovits,et al.  Awareness of the ‘possible’ as a mediator of formal thinking in conditional reasoning problems , 1984 .

[17]  G. Logan Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[18]  Pierre Barrouillet,et al.  Content and context effects in children's and adults' conditional reasoning , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[19]  Henry Markovits,et al.  Conditional reasoning, causality, and the structure of semantic memory: strength of association as a predictive factor for content effects , 1998, Cognition.

[20]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Conditionals: A Theory of Meaning, Pragmatics, and Inference , 2002 .