A Relational View of Accounting Information Sharing

Today’s organizations are characterized by a network of relationships with various customers and suppliers. As such, the critical resources leading to competitive advantage may no longer reside within a firm’s own boundaries and instead be a part of the network of relationships. This perspective, known as the relational view of the firm, suggests that a firm’s critical resources may be embedded in the routines and processes associated with inter-firm relationships. One such inter-firm process is the sharing of accounting information. Using the relational view of the firm, this study develops a research model with three antecedent factors of accounting information-sharing (electronic integration systems, trust, and knowledge-sharing routines) which can lead to benefits associated with inter-organizational competitive advantage. We find that the factors of trust and knowledge-sharing have direct effects on accounting information-sharing, while the factor of electronic integration has an indirect effect through the enabling of knowledge-sharing routines.

[1]  Jeltje van der Meer-Kooistra,et al.  Accounting for control and trust building in interfirm transactional relationships , 2009 .

[2]  Nirmalya Kumar,et al.  The power of trust in manufacturer-retailer relationships , 1996 .

[3]  Cyril Tomkins,et al.  Interdependencies, trust and information in relationships, alliances and networks , 2001 .

[4]  H. Håkansson,et al.  Accounting in an Interorganizational Setting , 2006 .

[5]  Susan Cohen Kulp The Effect of Information Precision and Information Reliability on Manufacturer-Retailer Relationships , 2002 .

[6]  Miguel Martinez Ramos,et al.  Interaction between management accounting and supply chain management , 2004 .

[7]  E. Nevis,et al.  Understanding Organizations as Learning Systems , 1995 .

[8]  Wynne W. Chin The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[9]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Absorptive Capacity Configurations in Supply Chains: Gearing for Partner-Enabled Market Knowledge Creation , 2005, MIS Q..

[10]  Graham K. Rand Beyond Partnership: Strategies for Innovation and Lean Supply , 1993 .

[11]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Relational governance as an interorganizational strategy: An empirical test of the role of trust in economic exchange , 1995 .

[12]  H. Winklhofer,et al.  Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development , 2001 .

[13]  Zach G. Zacharia,et al.  The nature of interfirm partnering in supply chain management , 2000 .

[14]  R. Handfield,et al.  Supplier integration into new product development: coordinating product, process and supply chain design , 2005 .

[15]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[16]  Jan Mouritsen,et al.  Accounting, network complementarities and the development of inter-organisational relations , 2006 .

[17]  James Richardson Beyond Partnership: Strategies for Innovation and Lean Supply , 1994 .

[18]  Stephanie S. Barrett,et al.  Inter-Organization Information Sharing Systems , 1982, MIS Q..

[19]  Jan Mouritsen,et al.  Inter-organizational controls and organizational competencies: episodes around target cost management/functional analysis and open book accounting , 2001 .

[20]  Anandhi S. Bharadwaj,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation , 2000, MIS Q..

[21]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Develop Long-Term Competitiveness through IT Assets , 1996 .

[22]  E. L. Nichols,et al.  Introduction to Supply Chain Management , 1998 .

[23]  Michael D. Shields,et al.  Handbook of management accounting research , 2007 .

[24]  Henri C. Dekker,et al.  Control of inter-organizational relationships: evidence on appropriation concerns and coordination requirements , 2004 .

[25]  Dovev Lavie The Competitive Advantage of Interconnected Firms: An Extension of the Resource-Based View , 2006 .

[26]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[27]  T. C. Powell,et al.  Information technology as competitive advantage: the role of human , 1997 .

[28]  S. Vickery,et al.  The effects of an integrative supply chain strategy on customer service and financial performance: an analysis of direct versus indirect relationships , 2003 .

[29]  Matthew D. Hall,et al.  The effect of comprehensive performance measurement systems on role clarity, psychological empowerment and managerial performance , 2008 .

[30]  Andreas Hoffjan,et al.  Open book accounting in supply chains-When and how is it used in practice? , 2006 .

[31]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Strategic assets and organizational rent , 1993 .

[32]  Peter C. Brewer,et al.  Introduction to managerial accounting , 1995 .

[33]  Qiang Tu,et al.  Absorptive capacity: Enhancing the assimilation of time-based manufacturing practices , 2006 .

[34]  Jeffrey H. Dyer EFFECTIVE INTERFIRM COLLABORATION : HOW FIRMS MINIMIZE TRANSACTION COSTS AND MAXIMIZE TRANSACTION VALUE r , 1998 .

[35]  Jatinder N. D. Gupta,et al.  Operational and financial effectiveness of e-collaboration tools in supply chain integration , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[36]  M. Wade,et al.  Review: the resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research , 2004 .

[37]  A. Hopwood,et al.  Looking across rather than up and down: On the need to explore the lateral processing of information , 1996 .

[38]  Shannon W. Anderson,et al.  Managing Costs and Cost Structure Throughout the Value Chain: Research on Strategic Cost Management , 2005 .

[39]  J. H. Dyer Effective interim collaboration: how firms minimize transaction costs and maximise transaction value , 1997 .

[40]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Net-Enabled Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[41]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[42]  R. Gulati Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation , 1999 .

[43]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research , 2007, MIS Q..

[44]  J. Cullen,et al.  Inter-Organisational Cost Management: Towards an Evolutionary Perspective , 2006 .

[45]  C. Lengnick-Hall Customer Contributions to Quality: A Different View of the Customer-Oriented Firm , 1996 .

[46]  Lili-Anne Kihn,et al.  Information system integration, enabling control and performance , 2009 .

[47]  James Marson,et al.  Interfirm supply chains: The contribution of management accounting , 1999 .

[48]  A. Bharadwaj,et al.  IT Capabilities : Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Operationalization , 2013 .

[49]  Shannon W. Anderson,et al.  Using Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) to Improve the Efficiency of Accounting Transactions , 2002 .

[50]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[51]  Ariela Caglio,et al.  Interdependence and accounting information exchanges in inter-firm relationships , 2012 .

[52]  William J. Kettinger,et al.  Information Orientation: The Link to Business Performance , 2001 .

[53]  M. Primo,et al.  An exploratory study of the effects of supplier relationships on new product development outcomes , 2002 .

[54]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[55]  James L. Hoyt,et al.  From arms‐length to collaborative relationships in the supply chain , 2000 .

[56]  Mohamed Z. Elbashir,et al.  The Role of Organizational Absorptive Capacity in Strategic Use of Business Intelligence to Support Integrated Management Control Systems , 2011 .

[57]  Lisa M. Ellram,et al.  Factors that drive purchasing and supply management's use of information technology , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[58]  Nilesh Saraf,et al.  IS Application Capabilities and Relational Value in Interfirm Partnerships , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[59]  J. Liedtka Collaborating across lines of business for competitive advantage , 1996 .

[60]  R. Grant Chapter 8 – Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 1999 .

[61]  Robin R. Pennington,et al.  The Effects of Qualitative Overload on Technology Acceptance , 2006, J. Inf. Syst..