The fine structure of the left periphery: COMPs and subjects Evidence from Romance

This article explores the characteristics and syntactic behaviour of a peculiar construction in which what seem to be two finite complementisers are allowed to co-occur in specific subordinate clauses. As well as providing a detailed description of the structure in a number of Romance varieties, this research focuses on the different roles played by items belonging to the category traditionally labelled as COMP and on the status of the subjects found in the left periphery. Adopting the so-called split-CP hypothesis the proposed analysis argues for the expression of both discourse and inflectional features at the C level, overtly realised as distinct heads, and claims that there are both topicalised and focalised positions available to pre-verbal subjects in the left periphery, be they a DP or a quantified element.

[1]  Arnim von Stechow,et al.  On the Proper Treatment of Tense , 1995 .

[2]  Guglielmo Cinque,et al.  Functional Structure in DP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures , 2002 .

[3]  Marie Labelle,et al.  Predication, WH-Movement, and the Development of Relative Clauses , 1990 .

[4]  I. J. Ginneken,et al.  Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2003 , 2005 .

[5]  Guglielmo Cinque,et al.  Types of Ā-dependencies , 1990 .

[6]  R. Zanuttini.  Negation and Clausal Structure: A Comparative Study of Romance Languages , 1997 .

[7]  Noam Chomsky.  Derivation by phase , 1999 .

[8]  H. Keniston,et al.  The Syntax of Castilian Prose. The Sixteenth Century@@@South American Dictators during the First Century of Independence , 1937 .

[9]  Ian Roberts,et al.  Clause structure and language change , 1995 .

[10]  Anna Cardinaletti,et al.  Toward a cartography of subject positions , 2004 .

[11]  K. Kiss.  Identificational focus versus information focus , 1998 .

[12]  Carmen Dobrovie-Sorin.  The syntax of Romanian : comparative studies in Romance , 1994 .

[13]  Jean-Yves Pollock.  Verb movement, universal grammar and the structure of IP , 1989 .

[14]  L. Haegeman.  Elements of Grammar , 1997 .

[15]  C. Poletto,et al.  Topic, Focus and V2: defining the CP sublayers , 2004 .

[16]  James Mccloskey.  Subjecthood and Subject Positions , 1997 .

[17]  Remarks on Causative Constructions and Case Marking in French - A Review of S.R. Kayne's French Syntax : The Transformational Cycle and A.C. Quicoli's "Conditions on Quantifier Movement in French"- , 1979 .

[18]  Paola Benincà,et al.  Complement clitics in Medieval Romance: the Tobler-Mussafia law , 1995 .

[19]  K. Hale,et al.  Ken Hale: A Life in Language , 2001 .

[20]  G. Salvi,et al.  Current Studies in Italian Syntax , 2001 .

[21]  Liliane Haegeman,et al.  Conditional Clauses: External and Internal Syntax , 2003 .

[22]  Anca-Marina Velicu,et al.  THE STRUCTURE OF CP AND IP THE CARTOGRAPHY OF SYNTACTIC STRUCTURES , 2005 .

[23]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[24]  L. Rizzi.  The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery , 1997 .

[25]  J. Schroten,et al.  THE LEFT PERIPHERY IN CHILD FRENCH: EVIDENCE FOR A SIMPLY-SPLIT CP , 2008 .

[26]  Adriana Belletti,et al.  Structures and beyond , 2004 .

[27]  Luigi Rizzi,et al.  The structure of CP and IP , 2004 .

[28]  Fabio Pianesi,et al.  Tense and Aspect: From Semantics to Morphosyntax , 1997 .

[29]  Andrea Calabrese.  The lack of infinitival clauses in Salentino: A synchronic analysis , 1991 .

[30]  Kai-Uwe Von Fintel,et al.  Restrictions on quantifier domains , 1994 .

[31]  Luigi Rizzi,et al.  The Cartography of Syntactic Structures , 2009 .

[32]  G. Cinque.  Adverbs and functional heads , 1999 .

[33]  J. Bobaljik,et al.  Subject positions and the roles of TP , 1996 .

[34]  Mürvet Enç.  Anchoring conditions for tense , 1987 .

[35]  Terrell A. Morgan,et al.  THEORETICAL ANALYSES IN ROMANCE LINGUISTICS , 1992 .

[36]  Hans den Besten,et al.  On the Interaction of Root Transformations and Lexical Deletive Rules , 1983 .