Neuromotor Noise Is Malleable by Amplifying Perceived Errors

Variability in motor performance results from the interplay of error correction and neuromotor noise. This study examined whether visual amplification of error, previously shown to improve performance, affects not only error correction, but also neuromotor noise, typically regarded as inaccessible to intervention. Seven groups of healthy individuals, with six participants in each group, practiced a virtual throwing task for three days until reaching a performance plateau. Over three more days of practice, six of the groups received different magnitudes of visual error amplification; three of these groups also had noise added. An additional control group was not subjected to any manipulations for all six practice days. The results showed that the control group did not improve further after the first three practice days, but the error amplification groups continued to decrease their error under the manipulations. Analysis of the temporal structure of participants’ corrective actions based on stochastic learning models revealed that these performance gains were attained by reducing neuromotor noise and, to a considerably lesser degree, by increasing the size of corrective actions. Based on these results, error amplification presents a promising intervention to improve motor function by decreasing neuromotor noise after performance has reached an asymptote. These results are relevant for patients with neurological disorders and the elderly. More fundamentally, these results suggest that neuromotor noise may be accessible to practice interventions.

[1]  D. Sternad,et al.  Variability in motor learning: relocating, channeling and reducing noise , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  James Danckert,et al.  The Influence of Prism Adaptation on Perceptual and Motor Components of Neglect: A Reply to Saevarsson and Kristjansson , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[3]  Paolo Bonato,et al.  Patient specific ankle-foot orthoses using rapid prototyping , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[4]  D. Sternad,et al.  Decomposition of variability in the execution of goal-oriented tasks: three components of skill improvement. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  D. Sternad,et al.  Stability and variability: indicators for passive stability and active control in a rhythmic task. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Making smooth moves , 2022 .

[8]  Madalena Costa,et al.  Multiscale entropy analysis of complex physiologic time series. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[9]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  Lina L. E. Massone Sensorimotor learning , 1998 .

[11]  Dagmar Sternad,et al.  Neuromotor Noise, Error Tolerance and Velocity-Dependent Costs in Skilled Performance , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[12]  R A Scheidt,et al.  Learning to move amid uncertainty. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Biao Huang,et al.  System Identification , 2000, Control Theory for Physicists.

[14]  R. Enoka,et al.  Steadiness is reduced and motor unit discharge is more variable in old adults , 2000, Muscle & nerve.

[15]  Ethan R. Buch,et al.  Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  R Shadmehr,et al.  Electromyographic Correlates of Learning an Internal Model of Reaching Movements , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Konrad Paul Körding,et al.  The loss function of sensorimotor learning. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Gilbert T. Walker,et al.  On Periodicity in Series of Related Terms , 1931 .

[19]  J. Patton,et al.  Visual error augmentation for enhancing motor learning and rehabilitative relearning , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[20]  Christopher J. Hasson,et al.  Neural Control Adaptation to Motor Noise Manipulation , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[21]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  Sheila Lennon,et al.  Advances in Motor Learning and Control , 1997 .

[23]  Steven M. Pincus,et al.  A regularity statistic for medical data analysis , 1991, Journal of Clinical Monitoring.

[24]  Mark M. Churchland,et al.  Supplemental Data A Central Source of Movement Variability , 2006 .

[25]  K. Shenoy,et al.  A Central Source of Movement Variability , 2006, Neuron.

[26]  R. Scheidt,et al.  Reach adaptation and final position control amid environmental uncertainty after stroke. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Dagmar Sternad,et al.  Children With Dystonia Can Learn a Novel Motor Skill: Strategies That are Tolerant to High Variability , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[28]  Dagmar Sternad,et al.  Learning to never forget—time scales and specificity of long-term memory of a motor skill , 2013, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[29]  S. Coquillart,et al.  Haptic Guidance Improves the Visuo-Manual Tracking of Trajectories , 2008, PloS one.

[30]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Robot-enhanced motor learning: accelerating internal model formation during locomotion by transient dynamic amplification , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[31]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Is walking a random walk? Evidence for long-range correlations in stride interval of human gait. , 1995, Journal of applied physiology.

[32]  Dagmar Sternad,et al.  Acquisition of novel and complex motor skills: stable solutions where intrinsic noise matters less. , 2014, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[33]  R. J. Beers,et al.  Motor Learning Is Optimally Tuned to the Properties of Motor Noise , 2009, Neuron.

[34]  Aaron S. Andalman,et al.  Vocal Experimentation in the Juvenile Songbird Requires a Basal Ganglia Circuit , 2005, PLoS biology.

[35]  L. Selen,et al.  Impedance Control Reduces Instability That Arises from Motor Noise , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  C. Heckman,et al.  Active properties of motoneurone dendrites: diffuse descending neuromodulation, focused local inhibition , 2008, The Journal of physiology.

[37]  Dagmar Sternad,et al.  Directionality in distribution and temporal structure of variability in skill acquisition , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[38]  Qining Wang,et al.  Serotonin Affects Movement Gain Control in the Spinal Cord , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  J. L. Patton,et al.  Arm control recovery enhanced by error augmentation , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[40]  James L. Patton,et al.  A Real-Time Haptic/Graphic Demonstration of how Error Augmentation can Enhance Learning , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[41]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Improved Assessment of Orbital Stability of Rhythmic Motion with Noise , 2015, PloS one.

[42]  G. Yule On a Method of Investigating Periodicities in Disturbed Series, with Special Reference to Wolfer's Sunspot Numbers , 1927 .

[43]  Petre Stoica,et al.  Decentralized Control , 2018, The Control Systems Handbook.

[44]  Larry Wasserman,et al.  All of Statistics , 2004 .

[45]  Byron M. Yu,et al.  Neural Variability in Premotor Cortex Provides a Signature of Motor Preparation , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  Marcia K. O'Malley,et al.  Impact of visual error augmentation methods on task performance and motor adaptation , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[47]  Peter J. Beek,et al.  Can co-activation reduce kinematic variability? A simulation study , 2005, Biological Cybernetics.

[48]  Dagmar Sternad,et al.  Complexity of human postural control in young and older adults during prolonged standing , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[49]  D L Gilden,et al.  1/f noise in human cognition. , 1995, Science.

[50]  Angelo Gemignani,et al.  Spontaneous brain activity as a source of ideal 1/f noise. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[51]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Relevance of error: what drives motor adaptation? , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[52]  J. Kurths,et al.  Recurrence-plot-based measures of complexity and their application to heart-rate-variability data. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[53]  Yan Zhu,et al.  A neural circuit for circadian regulation of arousal , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[54]  A. Faisal,et al.  Noise in the nervous system , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[55]  Paolo Grigolini,et al.  A theory of 1/f noise in human cognition , 2009 .

[56]  Kelvin E. Jones,et al.  Sources of signal-dependent noise during isometric force production. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[57]  Philip N. Sabes,et al.  Calibration of visually guided reaching is driven by error-corrective learning and internal dynamics. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[58]  Masaki O. Abe,et al.  Variability, Noise, and Sensitivity to Error in Learning a Motor Task , 2010 .

[59]  H. F. Machiel Van der Loos,et al.  Error amplification to promote motor learning and motivation in therapy robotics , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[60]  J. Patton,et al.  Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[61]  J. Foley The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1968 .

[62]  Stuart Barber,et al.  All of Statistics: a Concise Course in Statistical Inference , 2005 .

[63]  Dagmar Sternad,et al.  Motor learning: changes in the structure of variability in a redundant task. , 2009, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[64]  John W. Tukey,et al.  Exploratory Data Analysis. , 1979 .

[65]  Dagmar Sternad,et al.  Noise Induces Biased Estimation of the Correction Gain , 2016, PloS one.

[66]  David J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Comparison of error-amplification and haptic-guidance training techniques for learning of a timing-based motor task by healthy individuals , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[67]  Ian Sharp,et al.  Visual error augmentation enhances learning in three dimensions , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[68]  J. Zbilut,et al.  Embeddings and delays as derived from quantification of recurrence plots , 1992 .

[69]  Dagmar Sternad,et al.  State space analysis of timing: exploiting task redundancy to reduce sensitivity to timing. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.