Breakthrough innovations in the U.S. biotechnology industry: the effects of technological space and geographic origin

How are breakthrough innovations created? Our study suggests that the type of external knowledge sourced determines the likelihood of creation of breakthrough innovation. We characterize the external knowledge utilized on two dimensions: its technological space and geographic origin. We draw on the concepts of local search and national innovation systems to identify critical knowledge inputs. We hypothesize that external knowledge characterized by technological distance or proximity and the national or international context can have a differential impact on breakthrough innovation. This is due to the contradictory implications of its value created by distance and to absorptive capacity limitations in effectively utilizing knowledge from a different context. To test our hypotheses we use patent data from the U.S. biotechnology industry. Our findings suggest that technologically distant knowledge of national origin has a curvilinear effect and technologically proximate knowledge of international origin has a positive effect on breakthrough innovation. However, simultaneous exploration along technologically and geographic dimensions is not useful to generating breakthrough innovation; technologically distant knowledge of international origin does not have a significant impact. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  The Theory of Economic Development , 2017 .

[2]  Stephen I. Cohen,et al.  Information Flow in Research and Development Laboratories. , 1969 .

[3]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[4]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[5]  Robert A. Burgelman.  A Process Model of Internal Corporate Venturing in the Diversified Major Firm , 1983 .

[6]  Leonard S. Reich,et al.  Edison, Coolidge, and Langmuir: Evolving Approaches to American Industrial Research , 1987, The Journal of Economic History.

[7]  Harbir Singh,et al.  The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode , 1988 .

[8]  D. Swann.  The retreat of the state: Deregulation and privatisation in the UK and US , 1988 .

[9]  John Cantwell,et al.  Technological Innovation and Multinational Corporations , 1989 .

[10]  M. Trajtenberg.  A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[11]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[12]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[13]  M. Porter.  The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[14]  F. Narin,et al.  Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents , 1991 .

[15]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[16]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[17]  D. Archibugi,et al.  Specialization and size of technological activities in industrial countries: The analysis of patent data , 1992 .

[18]  E. Glaeser,et al.  Growth in Cities , 1991, Journal of Political Economy.

[19]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[20]  E. Hippel.  Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation , 1994 .

[21]  B. Lundvall,et al.  The Learning Economy , 1994 .

[22]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Measuring competence?: exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research , 1994 .

[23]  G. Pisano.  Knowledge Integration and the Locus of Learning: An Empirical Analysis , 1994 .

[24]  J. Lerner.  The Importance of Patent Scope: An Empirical Analysis , 1994 .

[25]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Fortune favors the prepared firm , 1994 .

[26]  C. Freeman.  The ‘National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective , 1995 .

[27]  D. Mowery,et al.  Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer , 1996 .

[28]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[29]  O. Granstrand,et al.  Multi-Technology Corporations: Why They Have “Distributed” Rather Than “Distinctive Core” Competencies , 1997 .

[30]  Simon Reich,et al.  National structures and multinational corporate behavior: enduring differences in the age of globalization , 1997, International Organization.

[31]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  Stylised Fact of Patent Litigation: Value, Scope and Ownership , 1997 .

[32]  Richard Florida,et al.  The globalization of R&D: Results of a survey of foreign-affiliated R&D laboratories in the USA , 1997 .

[33]  S. Bartholomew.  National Systems of Biotechnology Innovation: Complex Interdependence in the Global System , 1997 .

[34]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[35]  Marco Iansiti,et al.  Technology Integration: Making Critical Choices in a Dynamic World , 1997 .

[36]  Jaeyong Song,et al.  Foreign Direct Investment and the Sourcing of Technological Advantage: Evidence from the Biotechnology Industry , 1997 .

[37]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[38]  Michael R. Darby,et al.  GEOGRAPHICALLY LOCALIZED KNOWLEDGE: SPILLOVERS OR MARKETS? , 1998 .

[39]  M. Tushman,et al.  Resource recombinations in the firm: knowledge structures and the potential for schumpeterian innovation , 1998 .

[40]  M. Fontes,et al.  The conditions for the development of a biotechnology industry in Portugal: the impact of country specific factors , 1998 .

[41]  Manuel G. Serapio,et al.  Globalization of industrial R&D: an examination of foreign direct investments in R&D in the United States , 1999 .

[42]  Alan Russell.  Biotechnology as a Technological Paradigm in the Global Knowledge Structure , 1999 .

[43]  David L. Deeds,et al.  The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: an empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry , 1999 .

[44]  F. Narin,et al.  Science and Technology as Predictors of Stock Performance , 1999 .

[45]  P. Roberts.  Product innovation, product–market competition and persistent profitability in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry , 1999 .

[46]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[47]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventions , 1999, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[48]  M. Feldman,et al.  Innovation in Cities: Science-Based Diversity, Specialization and Localized Competition , 1999 .

[49]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Innovation Policy in a Global Economy: Global corporations and national systems of innovation: who dominates whom? , 1999 .

[50]  John Cantwell,et al.  Technological globalisation and innovative centres: the role of corporate technological leadership and locational hierarchy , 1999 .

[51]  Gianni Lorenzoni,et al.  The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study , 1999 .

[52]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look , 2000 .

[53]  A. Stinchcombe.  Social Structure and Organizations , 2000, Political Organizations.

[54]  S. Breschi,et al.  The Geography of Innovation: A Cross-sector Analysis , 2000 .

[55]  F. Rothaermel.  Technological Discontinuities and the Nature of Competition , 2000 .

[56]  Jesper B. Sørensen,et al.  Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation , 2000 .

[57]  G. Ahuja.  Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[58]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  Best Practice? Geography, Learning and the Institutional Limits to Strong Convergence , 2001 .

[59]  Christian Zeller,et al.  Clustering Biotech: A Recipe for Success? Spatial Patterns of Growth of Biotechnology in Munich, Rhineland and Hamburg , 2001 .

[60]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures , 2001 .

[61]  Curba Morris Lampert,et al.  Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions , 2001 .

[62]  Tony S. Frost.  The geographic sources of foreign subsidiaries' innovations , 2001 .

[63]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[64]  Barbara Wejnert.  Integrating models of diffusion of innovations: a Conceptual Framework. , 2002 .

[65]  Lee Fleming,et al.  Finding the organizational sources of technological breakthroughs: the story of Hewlett‐Packard's thermal ink‐jet , 2002 .

[66]  Juan Alcácer,et al.  Knowledge Seeking and Location Choice of Foreign Direct Investment in the United States , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[67]  Annette L. Ranft,et al.  Acquiring New Technologies and Capabilities: A Grounded Model of Acquisition Implementation , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[68]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[69]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE IN MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS , 2002 .

[70]  Erwin Danneels.  The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences , 2002 .

[71]  Roger J. Calantone,et al.  Competitive forces and strategic choice decisions: An experimental investigation in the United States and Japan , 2002 .

[72]  David Terkla,et al.  The adoption and diffusion of high-performance management: lessons from Japanese multinationals in the West , 2003 .

[73]  Lee Fleming,et al.  Navigating the Technology Landscape of Innovation , 2003 .

[74]  Michelle Gittelman,et al.  Does Good Science Lead to Valuable Knowledge? Biotechnology Firms and the Evolutionary Logic of Citation Patterns , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[75]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities , 2003 .

[76]  Jens Frøslev Christensen.  INTRODUCTION: THE INDUSTRIAL DYNAMICS OF BIOTECHNOLOGY: NEW INSIGHTS AND NEW AGENDAS , 2003 .

[77]  J. Christensen,et al.  Turbulence and Competitive Dynamics in the Internet Services Industry , 2003 .

[78]  J. Spencer,et al.  Global gatekeeping, representation, and network structure: a longitudinal analysis of regional and global knowledge-diffusion networks , 2003 .

[79]  P. Almeida,et al.  Subsidiaries and knowledge creation: the influence of the MNC and host country on innovation , 2004 .