The Effects of Helper Intention on Gratitude and Indebtedness

Gratitude and indebtedness have often been equated in psychology. Emerging research, however, suggests that these emotions are experienced differently and occur in response to different situations (Gray, Emmons, & Morrison, 2001). The current set of experiments investigated the effects of helper intention on grateful and indebted reactions to a favor. Study 1 utilized scenario methodology to present participants with a favor that was given with benevolent or ulterior motives. Participants felt significantly more grateful when the helper had benevolent intentions. Reactions of indebtedness did not vary as a function of helper intention. In Study 2, participants recalled favors that had been done for them for either unselfish or selfish reasons. Participants reported significantly more gratitude for the favor when they were instructed to recall an unselfish favor. Levels of indebtedness were not affected by helper intention. Study 3 provided participants with an ambiguous favor scenario to better assess individuals' natural reactions to receiving help, and replicated the results of Study 1. Together, these three experiments provide support for differences between grateful and indebted emotions.

[1]  M. Greenberg.  A Theory of Indebtedness , 1980 .

[2]  Russell L. Kolts,et al.  The debt of gratitude: Dissociating gratitude and indebtedness , 2006 .

[3]  N. Anderson,et al.  Integration of intention and outcome in moral judgment , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[4]  A. Tesser,et al.  Some determinants of gratitude. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  J. Harvey,et al.  New Directions in Attribution Research , 2018 .

[6]  Lindsey J. Powell,et al.  It's the Thought That Counts , 2006, Psychological science.

[7]  Jo-Ann Tsang,et al.  BRIEF REPORT Gratitude and prosocial behaviour: An experimental test of gratitude , 2006 .

[8]  M. McCullough.  Savoring life, past and present: Explaining what hope and gratitude share in common , 2002 .

[9]  R. Roberts.  Virtues and Rules , 1991 .

[10]  D. T. Regan,et al.  Effects of a favor and liking on compliance , 1971 .

[11]  Phoebe C. Ellsworth,et al.  Shades of Joy: Patterns of Appraisal Differentiating Pleasant Emotions , 1988 .

[12]  P. Salovey,et al.  A broader conception of mood experience. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  Daniel Bar-Tal,et al.  Reciprocity behavior in the relationship between donor and recipient and between harm-doer and victim. , 1977 .

[14]  A. Gouldner.  THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .

[15]  R. Lazarus,et al.  Passion and reason : making sense of our emotions , 1994 .

[16]  Robert A Emmons,et al.  Gratitude as a Human Strength: Appraising the Evidence , 2000 .

[17]  R. H. Willis,et al.  Social Exchange: Advances In Theory And Research , 1981 .

[18]  Francis J. Flynn,et al.  It’s the Thought That Counts: On Perceiving How Helpers Decide to Lend a Hand , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[19]  Richard H. Smith,et al.  The Effect of a Favor on Public and Private Compliance: How Internalized is the Norm of Reciprocity? , 1999 .

[20]  Andrew Ortony,et al.  The Cognitive Structure of Emotions , 1988 .

[21]  S. Graham.  Children's developing understanding of the motivational role of affect: An attributional analysis , 1988 .

[22]  Daniel W. Russell,et al.  The cognition–emotion process in achievement-related contexts. , 1979 .

[23]  Michael E. McCullough,et al.  The Psychology of Gratitude , 2004 .

[24]  Karen A. Hegtvedt.  The effects of relationship structure on emotional responses to inequity , 1990 .