Quality function deployment using multispace design model and its application

Due to the rapid growth of the information and communication technology, most system developments are required not only the high functionality but also the flexibility to collaborate with the other one through the network. For the successful implementation of the difficult development, the conceptual design process in which the various stakeholders requirements and their bottlenecks are discussed, has become important. This paper introduces the multispace quality function deployment (M-QFD) and its analytical methods and illustrates their application to a lithography system design. M-QFD is comprised of four deployment charts which includes the four types of design elements: value, meaning, state, and attribute. M-QFD enables designers to extract the design elements based on diverse requirements (requirements of the customer, company, society, etc.) and the circumstance of the design objects (user physique, ambient temperature, etc.). In addition, the analytical methods for M-QFD (correspondence analysis, interpretive structural modeling, design structure matrix, and multi domain matrix) enable them to easily understand the design element relationships.

[1]  Udo Lindemann,et al.  TRANSPARENT 3D VISUALIZATION OF MECHATRONIC SYSTEM STRUCTURES , 2008 .

[2]  C. H. Yeh,et al.  Integration of four-phase QFD and TRIZ in product R&D: a notebook case study , 2011 .

[3]  Toshiharu Miwa,et al.  Product Development Task Planning Using Worth Flow Analysis , 2009, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[4]  Shirley A. Olsen,et al.  Group planning and problem-solving methods in engineering management , 1982 .

[5]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Design Structure Matrix Methods and Applications , 2012 .

[6]  Shih-Wen Hsiao,et al.  Concurrent design method for developing a new product , 2002 .

[7]  Kazunori Iwata,et al.  A Redundancy-Based Measure of Dissimilarity among Probability Distributions for Hierarchical Clustering Criteria , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[8]  Yoram Reich,et al.  A critical review of General Design Theory , 1995 .

[9]  Toshiharu Miwa,et al.  Evaluation method of product development process with technology risk using product worth flow analysis , 2012 .

[10]  Y. Zhang,et al.  Green QFD-II: A life cycle approach for environmentally conscious manufacturing by integrating LCA and LCC into QFD matrices , 1999 .

[11]  Yoshiyuki Matsuoka.  Multispace Design Model as Framework for Design Science towards Integration of Design , 2015 .

[12]  Jiunn-I Shieh,et al.  Integration of environmental considerations in quality function deployment by using fuzzy logic , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[13]  George Q. Huang,et al.  Synchronous quality function deployment (QFD) over world wide web , 2002 .

[14]  KuoTsai-Chi,et al.  Integration of environmental considerations in quality function deployment by using fuzzy logic , 2009 .

[15]  Liang-Hsuan Chen,et al.  Fuzzy Nonlinear Models for New Product Development Using Four-Phase Quality Function Deployment Processes , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[16]  Yoshiyuki Matsuoka,et al.  QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT BASED ON THE MULTISPACE DESIGN MODEL , 2013 .

[17]  Takeo Kato,et al.  MULTISPACE QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT FOR MODULARIZATION , 2014 .

[18]  Kosuke Ashihara,et al.  Application of Quality Function Deployment for New Business R&D Strategy Development , 2005 .

[19]  Udo Lindemann,et al.  Structural Complexity Management: An Approach for the Field of Product Design , 2008 .

[20]  Yoshiyuki Matsuoka,et al.  MULTI SPACE QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT USING INTERPRETIVE STRUCTURAL MODELING , 2014 .

[21]  Yoji Akao,et al.  Quality Function Deployment : Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design , 1990 .

[22]  Miryam Barad,et al.  Strategy maps as improvement paths of enterprises , 2008 .

[23]  John N. Warfield,et al.  SOCIETAL SYSTEMS Planning, Policy and Complexity , 1978 .