Quality Evaluation of Cone Biopsy Specimens Obtained by Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] A. Spathis,et al. Expression of HPV‐related biomarkers and grade of cervical intraepithelial lesion at treatment , 2014, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.
[2] Y. Ding,et al. Post-treatment human papillomavirus status and recurrence rates in patients treated with loop electrosurgical excision procedure conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. , 2013, European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology.
[3] F. Ghezzi,et al. Risk factors for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia recurrence after conization: a 10-year study. , 2012, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.
[4] S. Ghaem-Maghami,et al. Long‐term compliance with follow‐up after treatment for cervical intra‐epithelial neoplasia , 2012, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica.
[5] P. Soutter,et al. Histological recurrence and depth of loop treatment of the cervix in women of reproductive age: incomplete excision versus adverse pregnancy outcome , 2011, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.
[6] J. Gondry,et al. [Should CIN 2 and 3 be treated the same way?]. , 2011, Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité.
[7] C. Kietpeerakool,et al. Perioperative complications of an outpatient loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a review of 857 consecutive cases. , 2009, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.
[8] V. Melo,et al. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia recurrence after conization in HIV‐positive and HIV‐negative women , 2009, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.
[9] T. Wright,et al. 2006 Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Women with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia or Adenocarcinoma in Situ , 2008 .
[10] C. Houghton,et al. Cold knife versus laser cone biopsy for adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix—a comparison of management and outcome , 2007, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.
[11] A. Moscicki,et al. Regression of low-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesions in young women , 2004, The Lancet.
[12] L. Hirschowitz,et al. Predicting residual disease after excision of cervical dysplasia. , 2004, BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
[13] J. Hocking,et al. Influences on the risk of recurrent high grade cervical abnormality , 2002, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.
[14] K. Tamussino,et al. Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia III: Long‐Term Follow‐Up After Cold‐Knife Conization With Involved Margins , 2002, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[15] S. King,et al. Margin status and excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a review. , 2000, Obstetrical & gynecological survey.
[16] A. Ferenczy. Management of patients with high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions , 1995, Cancer.
[17] D. Gallup,et al. Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ): a pathologic evaluation. , 1994, Gynecologic oncology.
[18] M. Read,et al. Efficacy and safety of large-loop excision of the transformation zone , 1994, The Lancet.
[19] H. Wynter,et al. Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ)--an alternative treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. , 1993, West Indian medical journal.
[20] F. Montz,et al. Large-Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone: Effect on the Pathologic Interpretation of Resection Margins , 1993, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[21] W. Prendiville,et al. Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). A new method of management for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia , 1989, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.