Neural correlates of noncanonical syntactic processing revealed by a picture‐sentence matching task

It remains controversial whether the left inferior frontal gyrus subserves syntactic processing or short‐term memory demands. Here we devised a novel picture‐sentence matching task involving Japanese sentences with different structures to clearly contrast syntactic reanalysis processes. Using event‐related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), activations under three main conditions were directly compared: a canonical/subject‐initial active sentence (AS), a noncanonical/subject‐initial passive sentence (PS), and a noncanonical/object‐initial scrambled sentence (SS). We found that activation in the dorsal region of the left inferior frontal gyrus (dF3t) was enhanced more by the noncanonical processing under the PS and SS conditions than by the canonical processing under the AS condition, and this enhancement was independent of domain‐general factors, such as general memory demands and task difficulty. Moreover, the left posterior superior/middle temporal gyrus (pSTG/MTG) showed more enhanced responses to object‐initial sentences under the SS condition than to subject‐initial sentences under the AS and PS conditions, which were not significantly affected by task difficulty. Furthermore, activation in the left lateral premotor cortex (LPMC) increased under the AS, PS, and SS conditions, in that order. It is possible that task difficulty affects the left LPMC, but the three distinct activations patterns suggest that these frontal and temporal regions work in concert to process syntactic structures, with their respective contributions dynamically regulated by linguistic requirements. Hum Brain Mapp 2008. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  Linguistic prominence and Broca's area: The influence of animacy as a linearization principle , 2006, NeuroImage.

[2]  Derek K. Jones,et al.  Perisylvian language networks of the human brain , 2005, Annals of neurology.

[3]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  A Parametric Study of Prefrontal Cortex Involvement in Human Working Memory , 1996, NeuroImage.

[4]  Richard W Briggs,et al.  Left and right basal ganglia and frontal activity during language generation: Contributions to lexical, semantic, and phonological processes , 2003, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[5]  Gregory McCarthy,et al.  Polysensory interactions along lateral temporal regions evoked by audiovisual speech. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Who did what to whom? The neural basis of argument hierarchies during language comprehension , 2005, NeuroImage.

[7]  Yosef Grodzinsky,et al.  Neural correlates of syntactic movement: converging evidence from two fMRI experiments , 2004, NeuroImage.

[8]  Yasuki Noguchi,et al.  Selective Priming of Syntactic Processing by Event-Related Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Broca's Area , 2002, Neuron.

[9]  David Caplan,et al.  Localization of Syntactic Comprehension by Positron Emission Tomography , 1998, NeuroImage.

[10]  K. Heilman,et al.  Agrammatic Sentence Production: The Use of a Temporal-Spatial Strategy , 1995, Brain and Language.

[11]  P. Strick,et al.  Basal ganglia and cerebellar loops: motor and cognitive circuits , 2000, Brain Research Reviews.

[12]  Kuniyoshi L Sakai,et al.  Specialization in the Left Prefrontal Cortex for Sentence Comprehension , 2002, Neuron.

[13]  C. Büchel,et al.  Broca's area and the language instinct , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  S.-Y. Kuroda,et al.  What can Japanese Say About Government and Binding , 1992 .

[15]  D. Swinney,et al.  A Functional Neuroimaging Investigation of the Roles of Structural Complexity and Task-Demand During Auditory Sentence Processing , 2006, Cortex.

[16]  R. Turner,et al.  Language Control in the Bilingual Brain , 2006, Science.

[17]  H. Lüders,et al.  Functional connectivity in the human language system: a cortico-cortical evoked potential study. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[18]  Uta Frith,et al.  Cognitive psychology - Interacting minds - A biological basis , 1999 .

[19]  M. Ullman A neurocognitive perspective on language: The declarative/procedural model , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[20]  M. Mishkin,et al.  FOXP2 and the neuroanatomy of speech and language , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[21]  H J Tochon-Danguy,et al.  Updating working memory for words: A PET activation study , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[22]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[23]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  The role of the posterior superior temporal sulcus in the processing of unmarked transitivity , 2007, NeuroImage.

[24]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[25]  S. Bookheimer,et al.  Form and Content Dissociating Syntax and Semantics in Sentence Comprehension , 1999, Neuron.

[26]  M. Schwartz,et al.  The word order problem in agrammatism I. Comprehension , 1980, Brain and Language.

[27]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Temporal dynamics of brain activation during a working memory task , 1997, Nature.

[28]  J. Trueswell,et al.  The role of discourse context in the processing of a flexible word-order language , 2004, Cognition.

[29]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  The emergence of the unmarked: A new perspective on the language‐specific function of Broca's area , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[30]  C. Fiebach,et al.  Revisiting the role of Broca's area in sentence processing: Syntactic integration versus syntactic working memory , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[31]  M D'Esposito,et al.  The roles of prefrontal brain regions in components of working memory: effects of memory load and individual differences. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  F. Rösler,et al.  Brain Activation Modulated by the Comprehension of Normal and Pseudo-word Sentences of Different Processing Demands: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[33]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  C. Frith,et al.  Interacting minds--a biological basis. , 1999, Science.

[35]  Hiroto Hoshi,et al.  Theta-role assignment, passivization, and excorporation , 1994 .

[36]  Hiromu Sakai,et al.  Priority Information Used for the Processing of Japanese Sentences: Thematic Roles, Case Particles or Grammatical Functions? , 2005, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[37]  J. Gee,et al.  Neural basis for sentence comprehension: Grammatical and short‐term memory components , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[38]  A. Anwander,et al.  The brain differentiates human and non-human grammars: Functional localization and structural connectivity , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  M. Inase,et al.  Corticostriatal and corticosubthalamic input zones from the presupplementary motor area in the macaque monkey: comparison with the input zones from the supplementary motor area , 1999, Brain Research.

[40]  T. Allison,et al.  Functional anatomy of biological motion perception in posterior temporal cortex: an FMRI study of eye, mouth and hand movements. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[41]  Kuniyoshi L Sakai,et al.  An event-related fMRI study of explicit syntactic processing of normal/anomalous sentences in contrast to implicit syntactic processing. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.