Function and manipulation tool knowledge in apraxia: Knowing ‘what for’ but not ‘how’

Abstract Several accounts of the semantic system posit that function information plays a critical role in the representations of man-made objects. Alternative possibilities are that man-made objects such as tools are organized according to manner of manipulation, or that both function and manipulation information figure importantly and distinctly in man-made object representations. An agnosic patient, FB, reported by Sirigu et al. (Brain 1991; 114: 727-41) provides support for the latter view. FB was able to demonstrate how to manipulate objects whose function he did not recognize. We now report two severely apraxic patients whose performance, together with that of FBI indicates that function and manipulation information may doubly dissociate. On ‘declarative’ semantic tests not requiring gesture production, our subjects demonstrate severely impaired manipulation knowledge in the context of relatively intact (and, in one subject, perfectly unimpaired) function knowledge. The double dissociation provides further support for the notion that function and manipulation knowledge are critical and distinct features of the representations of manipulable man-made objects.

[1]  K. Poeck,et al.  Ideatory Apraxia in a Left-Handed Patient with Right-Sided Brain Lesion , 1980, Cortex.

[2]  L. Tyler,et al.  ‘Two Eyes of a See-through’: Impaired and Intact Semantic Knowledge in a Case of Selective Deficit for Living Things , 1998 .

[3]  K. Heilman,et al.  Ideational apraxia: A deficit in tool selection and use , 1989, Annals of neurology.

[4]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Domain-Specific Knowledge Systems in the Brain: The Animate-Inanimate Distinction , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  Bernard Giusiano,et al.  Optic Aphasia: Evidence of the Contribution of Different Neural Systems to Object and Action Naming * * A subset of these data was presented at the Congress of the European Federation of Neurological Societies, Marseille, September 1995. , 1997, Cortex.

[6]  Bernard Giusiano,et al.  Category specificity in object agnosia: preservation of sensorimotor experiences related to objects , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  E. Warrington,et al.  Two Categorical Stages of Object Recognition , 1978, Perception.

[8]  J R Hodges,et al.  "What" and "how": evidence for the dissociation of object knowledge and mechanical problem-solving skills in the human brain. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  A. Damasio Category-related recognition defects as a clue to the neural substrates of knowledge , 1990, Trends in Neurosciences.

[10]  G. Humphreys,et al.  On the links between visual knowledge and naming: a single case study of a patient with a category-specific impairment for living things , 1997 .

[11]  I. Robertson,et al.  `Oops!': Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  Laurel J Buxbaum,et al.  Naturalistic action production following right hemisphere stroke , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  E. Warrington,et al.  CATEGORY SPECIFIC ACCESS DYSPHASIA , 1983 .

[14]  M. Lezak Neuropsychological assessment, 3rd ed. , 1995 .

[15]  F. Lucchelli,et al.  Are Semantic Systems Separately Represented in the Brain? The Case of Living Category Impairment , 1994, Cortex.

[16]  L. Buxbaum,et al.  Naturalistic action and praxis in callosal apraxia , 1995 .

[17]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A computational model of semantic memory impairment: modality specificity and emergent category specificity. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[18]  S. Rapcsak,et al.  Praxis and the Right Hemisphere , 1993, Brain and Cognition.

[19]  K. Heilman,et al.  A Cognitive Neuropsychological Model of Limb Praxis , 1991 .

[20]  E. Warrington Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology the Selective Impairment of Semantic Memory the Selective Impairment of Semantic Memory , 2022 .

[21]  A. Finset,et al.  Neuropsychological predictors in stroke rehabilitation. , 1988, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[22]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Domain-Specific Knowledge Systems in the Brain: The Animate-Inanimate Distinction , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  K M Heilman,et al.  Ecological implications of limb apraxia: Evidence from mealtime behavior , 1995, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[24]  I. T. Draper THE ASSESSMENT OF APHASIA AND RELATED DISORDERS , 1973 .

[25]  A Caramazza,et al.  Deficits in lexical and semantic processing: Implications for models of normal language , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[26]  L. Buxbaum,et al.  The Role of Semantic Memory in Object Use , 1997 .

[27]  H. Goodglass,et al.  Disorders in executive control functions among aphasic and other brain-damaged patients. , 1990, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[28]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Recognition by action: dissociating visual and semantic routes to action in normal observers. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Calling a squirrel a squirrel but a canoe a wigwam: a category-specific deficit for artefactual objects and body parts , 1992 .

[30]  Michael W. Montgomery,et al.  Naturalistic action impairment in closed head injury. , 1998, Neuropsychology.

[31]  Randall J. Frank,et al.  Explaining category-related effects in the retrieval of conceptual and lexical knowledge for concrete entities: operationalization and analysis of factors , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  M Poncet,et al.  The role of sensorimotor experience in object recognition. A case of multimodal agnosia. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[33]  Lorraine K. Tyler,et al.  When leopards lose their spots: knowledge of visual properties in category-specific deficits for living things , 1997 .

[34]  T. Shallice,et al.  Category specific semantic impairments. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[35]  M. Silveri,et al.  Interaction between vision and language in category-specific semantic impairment , 1988 .

[36]  E. Warrington,et al.  Categories of knowledge. Further fractionations and an attempted integration. , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[37]  L. Buxbaum,et al.  Ideational apraxia and naturalistic action. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[38]  Guido Gainotti,et al.  Cognitive and anatomical locus of lesion in a patient with a category-specific semantic impairment for living beings , 1996 .

[39]  E. Roy,et al.  Common Considerations In The Study of Limb, Verbal And Oral Apraxia , 1985 .

[40]  P Garrard,et al.  Category specific semantic loss in dementia of Alzheimer's type. Functional-anatomical correlations from cross-sectional analyses. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[41]  David Howard Pyramids and Palm Trees Test (The) , 1992 .

[42]  Impaired knowledge of visual and non-visual attributes in a patient with a semantic impairment for living entities: A case of a true category-specific deficit , 1998 .

[43]  T. Shallice Specialisation within the semantic system , 1988 .

[44]  L. Buxbaum,et al.  The Role of the Dynamic Body Schema in Praxis: Evidence from Primary Progressive Apraxia , 2000, Brain and Cognition.

[45]  K. Heilman,et al.  Two forms of ideomotor apraxia , 1982, Neurology.

[46]  Matthew A. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Are living and non-living category-specific deficits causally linked to impaired perceptual or associative knowledge? evidence from a category-specific double dissociation , 1998 .

[47]  E. Warrington,et al.  Category specific access dysphasia. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.