Interpretable machine learning for predicting biomethane production in industrial-scale anaerobic co-digestion.

The objective of this study is to apply machine learning models to accurately predict daily biomethane production in an industrial-scale co-digestion facility. The methodology involved applying elasticnet, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting to input-output data from an industrial-scale anaerobic co-digestion (ACoD) facility. The models were used to predict biomethane for 1-day, 3-day, 5-day, 10-day, 20-day, 30-day, and 40-day time horizons. These models were fit on four years of operational data. The results showed that elastic net (a model with assumptions of linearity) was clearly outperformed by random forest and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), which had out-of-sample R2values ranging between 0.80 and 0.88, depending on the time horizon. In addition, feature importance and partial dependence analysis demonstrated the marginal and interaction effects on biomethane of selected biowaste inputs. For instance, food waste co-digested with percolate were shown to have strong positive interaction effects. One implication of this study is that XGBoost and random forest algorithms applied to industrial-scale ACoD data provide dependable prediction results and may be a useful complement for experimental and mechanistic/theoretical models of anaerobic digestion, especially where detailed substrate characterization is difficult. However, these models have limitations, and suggestions for deriving additional value from these methods are proposed.

[1]  Li Tang,et al.  A mass diffusion-based interpretation of the effect of total solids content on solid-state anaerobic digestion of cellulosic biomass. , 2014, Bioresource technology.

[2]  Yang Zhang,et al.  Improved ADM1 model for anaerobic digestion process considering physico-chemical reactions. , 2015, Bioresource technology.

[3]  Perry L. McCarty,et al.  Methane fermentation of selected lignocellulosic materials. , 1990 .

[4]  Vinod Tare,et al.  Application of neural network for simulation of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor performance. , 2002, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[5]  J. Friedman Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. , 2001 .

[6]  E. Bouwer,et al.  Synergistic co-digestion of wastewater grown algae-bacteria polyculture biomass and cellulose to optimize carbon-to-nitrogen ratio and application of kinetic models to predict anaerobic digestion energy balance. , 2018, Bioresource technology.

[7]  R. Escudié,et al.  Influence of moisture content on the specific methanogenic activity of dry mesophilic municipal solid waste digestate , 2012 .

[8]  Jing Liu,et al.  Early prediction of Biochemical Methane Potential through statistical and kinetic modelling of initial gas production. , 2015, Bioresource technology.

[9]  Kaijun Wang,et al.  Modeling the performance of anaerobic digestion reactor by the anaerobic digestion system model (ADSM) , 2018 .

[10]  A. P. Batista,et al.  Co-digestion of Rhodosporidium toruloides biorefinery wastes for biogas production , 2018 .

[11]  J Keller,et al.  A review of ADM1 extensions, applications, and analysis: 2002-2005. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[12]  Nenad Stanić,et al.  Explainable extreme gradient boosting tree-based prediction of toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene wet deposition. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[13]  V. Gunaseelan Predicting ultimate methane yields of Jatropha curcus and Morus indica from their chemical composition. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[14]  K. Hamidieh A data-driven statistical model for predicting the critical temperature of a superconductor , 2018, Computational Materials Science.

[15]  Jan Van Impe,et al.  Mathematical modelling of anaerobic digestion of biomass and waste: Power and limitations , 2013 .

[16]  Liang Wang,et al.  Semi-supervised Elastic net for pedestrian counting , 2011, Pattern Recognit..

[17]  K. Koch,et al.  Biogas from grass silage - Measurements and modeling with ADM1. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[18]  N Bernet,et al.  Dynamic effect of total solid content, low substrate/inoculum ratio and particle size on solid-state anaerobic digestion. , 2013, Bioresource technology.

[19]  W. Qiao,et al.  Improving methane production and anaerobic digestion stability of food waste by extracting lipids and mixing it with sewage sludge. , 2017, Bioresource technology.

[20]  Xiaofei Zhao,et al.  Modified Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 for modeling methane production from food waste in batch and semi-continuous anaerobic digestions. , 2019, Bioresource technology.

[21]  Yan Jiang,et al.  Inactivation of Salmonella during dry co-digestion of food waste and pig manure. , 2018, Waste management.

[22]  K. Stamatelatou,et al.  Modeling of anaerobic digestion of slaughterhouse wastes after thermal treatment using ADM1. , 2018, Journal of environmental management.

[23]  E. Thorin,et al.  Co-digestion of sewage sludge and microalgae – Biogas production investigations , 2017, Applied Energy.

[24]  Jinyue Yan,et al.  Investigating the possibility of applying an ADM1 based model to a full-scale co-digestion plant , 2017 .

[25]  P. E. Poh,et al.  Adaptive neural-fuzzy inference system vs. anaerobic digestion model No.1 for performance prediction of thermophilic anaerobic digestion of palm oil mill effluent , 2018, Process Safety and Environmental Protection.

[26]  Venkatesh Balan,et al.  Incorporating anaerobic co-digestion of steam exploded or ammonia fiber expansion pretreated sugarcane residues with manure into a sugarcane-based bioenergy-livestock nexus. , 2019, Bioresource technology.

[27]  G. Antonopoulou,et al.  Modeling of fermentative hydrogen production from sweet sorghum extract based on modified ADM1 , 2012 .

[28]  J. Steyer,et al.  A waste characterisation procedure for ADM1 implementation based on degradation kinetics. , 2012, Water research.

[29]  Rafael Borja,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of solid organic substrates in batch mode: An overview relating to methane yields and experimental procedures , 2012 .

[30]  O. Romero,et al.  Anaerobic co-digestion of sugarcane press mud with vinasse on methane yield , 2017 .

[31]  W. Nimmo,et al.  Modelling the anaerobic digestion of solid organic waste - Substrate characterisation method for ADM1 using a combined biochemical and kinetic parameter estimation approach. , 2016, Waste management.

[32]  N. Balagurusamy,et al.  Oil-extracted Chlorella vulgaris biomass and glycerol bioconversion to methane via continuous anaerobic co-digestion with chicken litter , 2018, Renewable Energy.

[34]  A. Mudhoo,et al.  Co–digestion of coffee residues and sugarcane vinasse for biohythane generation , 2018 .

[35]  R. K. Saray,et al.  Enhancement of biogas production from sewage sludge in a wastewater treatment plant: Evaluation of pretreatment techniques and co-digestion under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions , 2018, Energy.

[36]  Shikun Cheng,et al.  Evaluation of artificial neural network models for online monitoring of alkalinity in anaerobic co-digestion system , 2018, Biochemical Engineering Journal.

[37]  F. Uhlenhut,et al.  Wet biowaste digestion: ADM1 model improvement by implementation of known genera and activity of propionate oxidizing bacteria. , 2018, Water research.

[38]  R. Banerjee,et al.  Modeling and optimization of anaerobic codigestion of potato waste and aquatic weed by response surface methodology and artificial neural network coupled genetic algorithm. , 2016, Bioresource technology.

[39]  Emil Pitkin,et al.  Peeking Inside the Black Box: Visualizing Statistical Learning With Plots of Individual Conditional Expectation , 2013, 1309.6392.

[40]  H. Zou,et al.  Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net , 2005 .

[41]  V. Eijsink,et al.  Synergistic effects of anaerobic co-digestion of whey, manure and fish ensilage. , 2018, Bioresource technology.

[42]  S. Porto,et al.  Evaluation of biomethane potential from by-products and agricultural residues co-digestion in southern Italy. , 2018, Journal of environmental management.

[43]  B. Dale,et al.  Anaerobic co-digestion of multiple agricultural residues to enhance biogas production in southern Italy. , 2018, Waste management.

[44]  Maged M. Hamed,et al.  Prediction of wastewater treatment plant performance using artificial neural networks , 2004, Environ. Model. Softw..

[45]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[46]  E. Trably,et al.  Semi-continuous mono-digestion of OFMSW and Co-digestion of OFMSW with beech sawdust: Assessment of the maximum operational total solid content. , 2019, Journal of environmental management.

[47]  Hung-Suck Park,et al.  Characterization of co-digestion of industrial sludges for biogas production by artificial neural network and statistical regression models , 2013, Environmental technology.

[48]  M. Barlaz,et al.  Distributed model of solid waste anaerobic digestion: Effects of leachate recirculation and pH adjustment , 2003, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[49]  F Cecchi,et al.  Application of the IWA ADM1 model to simulate anaerobic co-digestion of organic waste with waste activated sludge in mesophilic condition. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[50]  K. Konstantopoulos,et al.  Co-digestion of municipal waste biopulp with marine macroalgae focusing on sodium inhibition , 2019, Energy Conversion and Management.

[51]  Xinchun Chen,et al.  Modified ADM1 for modeling free ammonia inhibition in anaerobic acidogenic fermentation with high-solid sludge. , 2017, Journal of environmental sciences.

[52]  Francisco José Climent Diranzo,et al.  Anticipating bank distress in the Eurozone: An Extreme Gradient Boosting approach , 2019, Journal of Business Research.

[53]  Chang Liu,et al.  Anaerobic co-digestion process for biogas production: Progress, challenges and perspectives , 2017 .

[54]  H. Siegrist,et al.  The IWA Anaerobic Digestion Model No 1 (ADM1). , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[55]  Constantine Kontokosta,et al.  Grading buildings on energy performance using city benchmarking data , 2019, Applied Energy.

[56]  Fenglin Yang,et al.  Performance enhancement by rumen cultures in anaerobic co-digestion of corn straw with pig manure , 2018, Biomass and Bioenergy.

[57]  Hanne Østergård,et al.  Statistical prediction of biomethane potentials based on the composition of lignocellulosic biomass. , 2014, Bioresource technology.

[58]  D. Martin,et al.  Reaction Mechanisms in Solid-State Anaerobic Digestion: 1. The Reaction Front Hypothesis , 2003 .

[59]  M. Rahman,et al.  Anaerobic co-digestion of poultry droppings and briquetted wheat straw at mesophilic and thermophilic conditions: Influence of alkali pretreatment , 2018, Renewable Energy.

[60]  Piotr Biernacki,et al.  Application of Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 for describing anaerobic digestion of grass, maize, green weed silage, and industrial glycerine. , 2013, Bioresource technology.

[61]  L. Frunzo,et al.  ADM1 based mathematical model of trace element precipitation/dissolution in anaerobic digestion processes. , 2018, Bioresource technology.

[62]  Zhi-Wu Wang,et al.  Mathematical modeling of solid-state anaerobic digestion , 2015 .

[63]  Piotr Orliński,et al.  Evaluation of the biological methane potential of various feedstock for the production of biogas to supply agricultural tractors , 2016 .

[64]  K. Esquerre,et al.  Application of Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 for simulating anaerobic mesophilic sludge digestion. , 2015, Waste management.

[65]  Alain Vande Wouwer,et al.  Model selection, identification and validation in anaerobic digestion: a review. , 2011, Water research.