Deep reconstruction model for dynamic PET images

Accurate and robust tomographic reconstruction from dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) acquired data is a difficult problem. Conventional methods, such as the maximum likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM) algorithm for reconstructing the activity distribution-based on individual frames, may lead to inaccurate results due to the checkerboard effect and limitation of photon counts. In this paper, we propose a stacked sparse auto-encoder based reconstruction framework for dynamic PET imaging. The dynamic reconstruction problem is formulated in a deep learning representation, where the encoding layers extract the prototype features, such as edges, so that, in the decoding layers, the reconstructed results are obtained through a combination of those features. The qualitative and quantitative results of the procedure, including the data based on a Monte Carlo simulation and real patient data demonstrates the effectiveness of our method.

[1]  Joseph F. Murray,et al.  Dictionary Learning Algorithms for Sparse Representation , 2003, Neural Computation.

[2]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Reducing the Dimensionality of Data with Neural Networks , 2006, Science.

[3]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Design and construction of a realistic digital brain phantom , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Alfred O. Hero,et al.  Ieee Transactions on Image Processing: to Appear Penalized Maximum-likelihood Image Reconstruction Using Space-alternating Generalized Em Algorithms , 2022 .

[5]  Yu Tsao,et al.  Speech enhancement based on deep denoising autoencoder , 2013, INTERSPEECH.

[6]  Arman Rahmim,et al.  Statistical dynamic image reconstruction in state-of-the-art high-resolution PET , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  Robert Hecht-Nielsen,et al.  Theory of the backpropagation neural network , 1989, International 1989 Joint Conference on Neural Networks.

[8]  M. Rafecas,et al.  PET Reconstruction From Truncated Projections Using Total-Variation Regularization for Hadron Therapy Monitoring , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[9]  Yee Whye Teh,et al.  A Fast Learning Algorithm for Deep Belief Nets , 2006, Neural Computation.

[10]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  C Lartizien,et al.  GATE: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  Yasuo Horiuchi,et al.  Reverberant speech recognition based on denoising autoencoder , 2013, INTERSPEECH.

[13]  G. Muehllehner,et al.  Positron emission tomography , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Heng Tao Shen,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[15]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Four-dimensional (4D) image reconstruction strategies in dynamic PET: beyond conventional independent frame reconstruction. , 2009, Medical physics.

[16]  E. Levitan,et al.  A Maximum a Posteriori Probability Expectation Maximization Algorithm for Image Reconstruction in Emission Tomography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  Dynamic PET Reconstruction Using Wavelet Regularization With Adapted Basis Functions , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  A. Hero,et al.  Penalized maximum-likelihood image reconstruction using space-alternating generalized EM algorithms , 1995, 5th IEEE EMBS International Summer School on Biomedical Imaging, 2002..

[19]  Jianzhong Wu,et al.  Stacked Sparse Autoencoder (SSAE) for Nuclei Detection on Breast Cancer Histopathology Images , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.