Autonomic Cooperative Networking Protocol

Following the introduction of the notion of Autonomic Cooperative Behaviour (ACB) in the previous chapter, the bottom-up description of the proposed Autonomic Cooperative System Architectural Model (ACSAM) is continued with the outlining of the workings of the Autonomic Cooperative Networking Protocol (ACNP). In fact, the ACNP protocol is a cross-layer solution which is may be perceived as a bit biased towards the Network Layer of the Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) Reference Model (RM), however, on the other hand, it is profoundly rooted in the Distributed Spatio-Temporal Block Coding (DSTBC) of the Link Layer, in fact, going down even to the Physical Layer when the orchestration of the underlying Virtual Multiple Input Multiple Output (VMIMO) is concerned. In particular, once the motivation for the said cross-layering has been explained, the relevant context of the Optimised Link State Routing (OLSR) protocol is introduced to form the basis for its extension, the Autonomic Cooperative Networking Protocol. Following, the integration of the tightly related ACB is described with a special emphasis on its composition with the aid of the Multi-Point Relay (MPR) station selection heuristics. This part is complemented with the proposed messaging structure along with the detailing of the functioning of ACNP itself in terms of assigning Autonomic Cooperative Nodes (ACNs) to Virtual Cooperative Sets (VCSs). Eventually, the analysis of the expected overhead induced by the OLSR-ACNP tandem is carried out to establish the region of safe and efficient operation.

[1]  Michal Wodczak Aspects of cross-layer design in autonomic cooperative networking , 2011, 2011 Third International Workshop on Cross Layer Design.

[2]  Thomas Clausen,et al.  Digital Signatures for Admittance Control in the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol Version 2 , 2010 .

[3]  Mischa Dohler,et al.  Cooperative Communications: Hardware, Channel and PHY , 2010 .

[4]  Gerhard Fettweis,et al.  Relay-based deployment concepts for wireless and mobile broadband radio , 2004, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[5]  Siavash M. Alamouti,et al.  A simple transmit diversity technique for wireless communications , 1998, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[6]  Bruno Vidalenc,et al.  Design and Evaluation of Techniques for Resilience and Survivability of the Routing Node , 2013, Int. J. Adapt. Resilient Auton. Syst..

[7]  Michal Wódczak Autonomic cooperation in ad-hoc environments , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems and Workshops (DCOSS).

[8]  Gregory W. Wornell,et al.  Distributed space-time-coded protocols for exploiting cooperative diversity in wireless networks , 2003, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[9]  J. Lipman,et al.  Performance Investigation on three-classes of MANET Routing Protocols , 2005, 2005 Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications.

[10]  Szymon Szott,et al.  Standardizing a reference model and autonomic network architectures for the self-managing future internet , 2011, IEEE Network.

[11]  Gregory W. Wornell,et al.  Cooperative diversity in wireless networks: Efficient protocols and outage behavior , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[12]  Risto Wichman,et al.  Dynamic Resource Assignment and Cooperative Relaying in Cellular Networks: Concept and Performance Assessment , 2009, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[13]  Philippe Jacquet,et al.  Link state routing in wireless ad-hoc networks , 2003, IEEE Military Communications Conference, 2003. MILCOM 2003..

[14]  M. Wodczak,et al.  Extended REACT - Routing information Enhanced Algorithm for Cooperative Transmission , 2007, 2007 16th IST Mobile and Wireless Communications Summit.

[15]  Michal Wódczak Autonomic cooperative networking for wireless green sensor systems , 2011, Int. J. Sens. Networks.

[16]  Gerhard Fettweis,et al.  On the performance of cooperative relaying protocols in wireless networks , 2005, Eur. Trans. Telecommun..