Structure building and thematic constraints in Bantu inversion constructions 1

Bantu inversion constructions include locative inversion, patient inversion (also called subject–object reversal), semantic locative inversion and instrument inversion. The constructions show a high level of cross-linguistic variation, but also a core of invariant shared morphosyntactic and information structural properties. These include: that the preverbal position is filled by a non-agent NP triggering verbal agreement, that the agent follows the verb obligatorily, that object marking is disallowed, and that the preverbal NP is more topical, and the postverbal NP more focal. While previous analyses have tended to concentrate on one inversion type, the present paper develops a uniform analysis of Bantu inversion constructions. Adopting a Dynamic Syntax perspective, we show how the constructions share basic aspects of structure building and semantic representation. In our analysis, cross-linguistic differences in the distribution of inversion constructions result from unrelated parameters of variation, as well as from thematic constraints related to the thematic hierarchy. With some modification, the analysis can also be extended to passives.

[1]  Instrument Inversion in Zulu , 2012 .

[2]  Lutz Marten,et al.  The great siSwati locative shift , 2010 .

[3]  E. O. Ashton,et al.  A Luganda Grammar , 1955 .

[4]  Melissa Kline,et al.  The distribution of passives in spoken Sesotho , 2006 .

[5]  Anna Siewierska The Passive: A Contrastive Linguistic Analysis , 1984 .

[6]  M. Diercks Parameterizing Case: Evidence from Bantu , 2012 .

[7]  Ruth Kempson,et al.  Concepts of structural underspecification in Bantu and Romance , 2008 .

[8]  S. Thompson,et al.  Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse , 1980 .

[9]  M. Diercks The morphosyntax of Lubukusu locative inversion and the parameterization of Agree , 2011 .

[10]  Lutz Marten,et al.  Tone cases in Otjiherero: Head-complement relations, linear order and information structure , 2012 .

[11]  L. Marten,et al.  Locative object marking and the argument-adjunct distinction , 2012 .

[12]  Hannah Gibson,et al.  Auxiliary placement in Rangi : a dynamic syntax perspective , 2012 .

[13]  Caroline Heycock,et al.  The Syntax of Predication , 2013 .

[14]  Ronnie Cann,et al.  5 Periphery Effects and the Dynamics of Tree Growth , 2007 .

[15]  Lutz Marten,et al.  Object marking and morphosyntactic variation in Bantu , 2012 .

[16]  Kasangati Kikuni Wabongambilu Kinyalolo,et al.  Syntactic dependencies and the SPEC-head agreement hypothesis in Kilega , 1991 .

[17]  Lutz Marten,et al.  An overview of object marking in Kiluguru , 2001 .

[18]  Brent Henderson Agreement, locality, and OVS in Bantu , 2011 .

[19]  Yukiko Morimoto,et al.  Discourse configurationality in Bantu morphosyntax , 2000 .

[20]  Fatima Hamlaoui,et al.  Focus marking and the unavailability of inversion structures in the Bantu language Bàsàá (A43) , 2015 .

[21]  Jochen Zeller Object marking in isiZulu , 2012 .

[22]  K. Demuth,et al.  Verb raising and subject inversion in Bantu relatives , 1999 .

[23]  John Bowers The syntax of predication , 1993 .

[24]  Lutz Marten Information structure and agreement: Subjects and subject agreement in Swahili and Herero , 2011 .

[25]  Eyamba G Bokamba,et al.  Question formation in some Bantu languages , 1976 .

[26]  Joan Bresnan,et al.  Locative inversion in Chichewa: a case study of factorization in grammar , 1989 .

[27]  Alexandre Kimenyi,et al.  A relational grammar of Kinyarwanda , 1980 .

[28]  T. Givón,et al.  On Understanding Grammar , 1979 .

[29]  D. Wedgwood,et al.  The meanings of focus: The significance of an interpretation-based category in cross-linguistic analysis1 , 2012, Journal of Linguistics.

[30]  D. S. M. W. Kazoza,et al.  African linguistics : essays in memory of M.W.K. Semikenke , 1985 .

[31]  L. Marten The preverbal position(s) in Bantu inversion constructions: Theoretical and comparative considerations , 2014 .

[32]  Marit Julien,et al.  Syntactic heads and word formation , 2002 .

[33]  Manfred Krifka,et al.  Basic notions of information structure , 2008 .

[34]  K. Kiss Identificational focus versus information focus , 1998 .

[35]  Brent Mykel Henderson,et al.  The syntax and typology of Bantu relative clauses , 2006 .

[36]  Kristina Riedel,et al.  The Syntax of Object Marking in Sambaa: A comparative Bantu perspective , 2009 .

[37]  Koen Bostoen,et al.  Passiveness and inversion in Mbuun (Bantu B87, DRC) , 2011 .

[38]  L. Buell Semantic and Formal Locatives: Implications for the Bantu Locative Inversion Typology 1 , 2006 .

[39]  Christine Howes,et al.  The Dynamics of Lexical Interfaces , 2011 .

[40]  Vicki Carstens,et al.  Agree and Epp in Bantu , 2005 .

[41]  Ellen Woolford,et al.  Why Passive Can Block Object Marking. , 1994 .

[42]  Patrick Blackburn,et al.  Linguistics, Logic and Finite Trees , 1993, Log. J. IGPL.

[43]  Dj Mkude A Study of kiluguru Syntax with Special Reference to the Transformational History of Sentences with Permuted Subject and Object , 1974 .

[44]  Langa Khumalo Passive, locative inversion in Ndebele and the unaccusative hypothesis , 2010 .

[45]  Videa P. De Guzman Indirect objects in SiSwati , 1987 .

[46]  D. Sperber,et al.  Relevance: Communication and Cognition , 1997 .

[47]  Martin Salzmann,et al.  Towards a Typology of Locative Inversion - Bantu, Perhaps Chinese and English - But Beyond? , 2011, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[48]  M. Halliday NOTES ON TRANSITIVITY AND THEME IN ENGLISH. PART 2 , 1967 .

[49]  L. Marten,et al.  A typology of Bantu subject inversion , 2014 .

[50]  Denis Creissels Tswana locatives and their status in the inversion construction , 2011 .

[51]  Malin Petzell,et al.  The Kagulu Language of Tanzania: Grammar, Texts and Vocabulary , 2008 .

[52]  L. Marten,et al.  Parameters of Morphosyntactic Variation in Bantu , 2007 .

[53]  Lutz Marten Focus strategies and the incremental development of semantic representations: evidence from Bantu , 2007 .

[54]  Ruth Kempson,et al.  The dynamics of language : an introduction , 2005 .

[55]  K. Demuth,et al.  Presentational focus and thematic structure in comparative Bantu , 1997 .

[56]  K. Bostoen,et al.  Subject marking, object-verb order and focus in Mbuun (Bantu, B87) , 2012 .

[57]  Jochen Zeller Locative inversion in Bantu and predication , 2013 .

[58]  Marianna Visser The syntax of the infinitive in Xhosa , 1989 .

[59]  Larry M. Hyman,et al.  Hierarchies of natural topic in Shona , 1974 .

[60]  K. Demuth Maturation and the Acquisition of the Sesotho Passive , 1989 .

[61]  Knud Lambrecht,et al.  Information structure and sentence form , 1994 .

[62]  Lutz Marten At the syntax-pragmatics interface : verbal underspecification and concept formation in dynamic syntax , 2002 .

[63]  THOMAS BEARTH,et al.  The contribution of African linguistics towards a general theory of focus. Update and critical review , 1999 .

[64]  Ronnie Cann,et al.  Tree growth dynamics , 2013 .

[65]  E. Bokamba Verbal Agreement as a noncyclic rule in Bantu , 1985 .

[66]  Lutz Marten,et al.  Variation and Grammaticalisation in Bantu Complex Verbal Constructions: The Dynamics of Information Growth in Swahili, Rangi and SiSwati , 2016 .

[67]  K. Demuth,et al.  Subject, topic and Sesotho passive , 1990, Journal of Child Language.

[68]  Enric Vallduví,et al.  The Informational Component , 1990 .

[69]  H. Ura Checking theory and grammatical functions in universal grammar , 2000 .

[70]  J. Bresnan,et al.  Topic, Pronoun, and Agreement in Chicheŵa@@@Topic, Pronoun, and Agreement in Chichewa , 1987 .

[71]  Vicki Carstens Hyperactivity and Hyperagreement in Bantu , 2011 .