Risk assessment for percutaneous coronary intervention: our version of the weather report?

[1]  W. O’Neill,et al.  Simplified scoring system for predicting mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  Laura P Coombs,et al.  Use of continuous quality improvement to increase use of process measures in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomized controlled trial. , 2003, JAMA.

[3]  S. Kelsey,et al.  Modeling and Risk Prediction in the Current Era of Interventional Cardiology: A Report From the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry , 2003, Circulation.

[4]  William S Weintraub,et al.  Development of a risk adjustment mortality model using the American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACC-NCDR) experience: 1998-2000. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  G. Grunkemeier,et al.  Cardiac surgery report cards: making the grade. , 2001, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[6]  S L Normand,et al.  Cardiac surgery report cards: comprehensive review and statistical critique. , 2001, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[7]  Kirit Patel,et al.  Simple Bedside Additive Tool for Prediction of In-Hospital Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Interventions , 2001, Circulation.

[8]  L Ohno-Machado,et al.  Simplified risk score models accurately predict the risk of major in-hospital complications following percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  David P Miller,et al.  Relation between lesion characteristics and risk with percutaneous intervention in the stent and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa era: An analysis of results from 10,907 lesions and proposal for new classification scheme. , 1999, Circulation.

[10]  T. Ryan,et al.  Multivariate prediction of in-hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary interventions in 1994-1996. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  S. Ellis,et al.  Relation of operator volume and experience to procedural outcome of percutaneous coronary revascularization at hospitals with high interventional volumes. , 1997, Circulation.

[12]  E L Hannan,et al.  Coronary angioplasty volume-outcome relationships for hospitals and cardiologists. , 1997, JAMA.

[13]  S. Kimmel,et al.  Development and validation of a simplified predictive index for major complications in contemporary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty practice , 1995 .

[14]  E L Hannan,et al.  Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in New York State. Risk factors and outcomes. , 1992, JAMA.

[15]  S. Kimmel,et al.  Development and validation of simplified predictive index for major complications in contemporary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty practice. The Registry Committee of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.