Normal and abnormal face selectivity of the M170 response in developmental prosopagnosics

Developmental prosopagnosia is a lifelong impairment in face recognition despite normal low-level visual processing. Here we used magnetoencephalography (MEG) to examine the M170 response, a component occurring approximately 170 ms after stimulus onset, in a group of five developmental prosopagnosics. In normal subjects, the M170 is "face-selective", with a consistently higher amplitude to faces than to a wide variety of other visual stimulus categories; the N170, a component recorded using event-related potentials (ERP) and thought to be analogous to the M170, also shows this "face selectivity". Two previous ERP studies with developmental prosopagnosics have found attenuation or absence of face selectivity in the N170 response of these subjects [Bentin, S., Deouell, L. Y., and Soroker, N. (1999). Selective visual streaming in face recognition: Evidence from developmental prosopagnosia. Neuroreport, 10, 823-827; Kress, T., and Daum, I. (2003). Event-related potentials reflect impaired face recognition in patients with congenital prosopagnosia. Neuroscience Letters, 352, 133-136]. Three of our developmental prosopagnosic group showed this non-selective pattern at the M170 while the remaining two prosopagnosics were indistinguishable from normal controls. Thus, impaired face recognition is not necessarily correlated with an absence of the "face-selective" M170. Furthermore, ERP recordings collected simultaneously in the two developmental prosopagnosics with seemingly selective M170s also showed N170s within the same normal selective range, demonstrating that the face-selective signals found with MEG are not due to differences between MEG and ERP. While the presence of face selectivity at these neurophysiological markers is insufficient for predicting normal behavioral performance with faces, it could help to distinguish different classes of face recognition deficits.

[1]  M. Eimer Event-related brain potentials distinguish processing stages involved in face perception and recognition , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[2]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[3]  B. Duchaine,et al.  Developmental prosopagnosia with normal configural processing , 2000, Neuroreport.

[4]  E. Halgren,et al.  Cognitive response profile of the human fusiform face area as determined by MEG. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  E K Warrington,et al.  Prosopagnosia: A Face-Specific Disorder , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[6]  A. J. Mistlin,et al.  Visual cells in the temporal cortex sensitive to face view and gaze direction , 1985, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[7]  S. Bentin,et al.  Domain specificity versus expertise: factors influencing distinct processing of faces , 2002, Cognition.

[8]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  I. Biederman,et al.  Less impairment in face imagery than face perception in early prosopagnosia , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Normal Greeble Learning in a Severe Case of Developmental Prosopagnosia , 2004, Neuron.

[11]  Brad Duchaine,et al.  Dissociations of Face and Object Recognition in Developmental Prosopagnosia , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  THE DESIGN OF A NEW LETTER CHART FOR MEASURING CONTRAST SENSITIVITY , 1988 .

[13]  Rafael Malach,et al.  Face-selective Activation in a Congenital Prosopagnosic Subject , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  M. Farah Is face recognition ‘special’? Evidence from neuropsychology , 1996, Behavioural Brain Research.

[15]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The selectivity of the occipitotemporal M170 for faces , 2000, Neuroreport.

[16]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. I: Potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex by face and non-face stimuli. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  M Mäntyjärvi,et al.  Normal values for the Pelli‐Robson contrast sensitivity test , 2001, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[18]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  H. Lissauer,et al.  A case of visual agnosia with a contribution to theory , 1988 .

[20]  E. D. Haan,et al.  A familial factor in the development of face recognition deficits. , 1999 .

[21]  Y. Jammes,et al.  Cardiorespiratory response to bicuculline during resistive loaded breathing in anesthetized rabbits , 1996, Neuroscience Letters.

[22]  R Hari,et al.  Face-specific responses from the human inferior occipito-temporal cortex , 1997, Neuroscience.

[23]  L. Deouell,et al.  Selective visual streaming in face recognition: evidence from developmental prosopagnosia. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[24]  M. Farah Visual Agnosia: Disorders of Object Recognition and What They Tell Us about Normal Vision , 1990 .

[25]  Age-related changes in brain neuromagnetic responses to face perception in humans , 2001, Neuroscience Letters.

[26]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Stages of processing in face perception: an MEG study , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  Nouchine Hadjikhani,et al.  Neural basis of prosopagnosia: An fMRI study , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[29]  T. Allison,et al.  Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  T. Allison,et al.  Face-Specific Processing in the Human Fusiform Gyrus , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  E. D. de Haan,et al.  A familial factor in the development of face recognition deficits. , 1999, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[33]  H. McConachie,et al.  Developmental Prosopagnosia. A Single Case Report , 1976, Cortex.

[34]  F. Lopera,et al.  Brain potentials reflect residual face processing in a case of prosopagnosia , 2004, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[35]  Verne S. Caviness,et al.  Prosopagnosia as a Deficit in Encoding Curved Surface , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  Ruth Campbell,et al.  A Fifteen Year Follow-Up of a Case of Developmental Prosopagnosia , 1991, Cortex.

[37]  Mariya V Cherkasova,et al.  Developmental prosopagnosia: A study of three patients , 2003, Brain and Cognition.

[38]  M. Tarr,et al.  The N170 occipito‐temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face‐specific processes in the human brain , 2000, Neuroreport.

[39]  Irene Daum,et al.  Event-related potentials reflect impaired face recognition in patients with congenital prosopagnosia , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[40]  D. Maurer,et al.  Neuroperception: Early visual experience and face processing , 2001, Nature.