ADHD classification by feature space separation with sparse representation

In recent years, increasing attention has been paid to Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) as one of the most common neurobehavioral diseases in school-age children. In this paper, sparse representation is used as an effective tool to analyze the corresponding functional brain connectivities from functional MRI data. Two diagnosis models, i.e., ADHD and healthy control models, are employed to deal with the ADHD patients and control subjects. In these models, we learn the feature spaces of ADHD and control components adaptively via dictionary learning. Moreover, we also perform an energy operation as a penalty term in the models, which forces the feature energy of subjects minimized in the wrong feature spaces. Following these models, we carefully design a framework for ADHD classification, where more sophisticated methods are adopted including synthetic minority oversampling technique and SVM. In the experiments on ADHD-200 dataset, our method can achieve a remarkable accuracy compared with several state-of-the-art classification methods.

[1]  Michael Elad,et al.  Efficient Implementation of the K-SVD Algorithm using Batch Orthogonal Matching Pursuit , 2008 .

[2]  Daoqiang Zhang,et al.  Network-based classification of ADHD patients using discriminative subnetwork selection and graph kernel PCA , 2016, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[3]  Xiangjian He,et al.  Learning a Discriminative Dictionary with CNN for Image Classification , 2016, ICONIP.

[4]  Ke Huang,et al.  Sparse Representation for Signal Classification , 2006, NIPS.

[5]  Laura Igual,et al.  Spatial discriminant ICA for RS-fMRI characterisation , 2014, 2014 International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging.

[6]  A. R. Rao,et al.  Attributed graph distance measure for automatic detection of attention deficit hyperactive disordered subjects , 2014, Front. Neural Circuits.

[7]  Yufeng Zang,et al.  Using Coherence to Measure Regional Homogeneity of Resting-State fMRI Signal , 2010, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[8]  Ladislav Peska,et al.  Classification of fMRI data using dynamic time warping based functional connectivity analysis , 2016, 2016 24th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO).

[9]  Peter Jensen,et al.  Epidemiologic considerations in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a review and update. , 2008, Child and adolescent psychiatric clinics of North America.

[10]  Nitesh V. Chawla,et al.  SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique , 2002, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[11]  Ru Yang,et al.  Dictionary-Based, Clustered Sparse Representation for Hyperspectral Image Classification , 2015 .

[12]  Yang Li,et al.  ELM-based classification of ADHD patients using a novel local feature extraction method , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM).

[13]  Eduardo Alonso,et al.  FCNet: A Convolutional Neural Network for Calculating Functional Connectivity from Functional MRI , 2017, CNI@MICCAI.

[14]  Laura Igual,et al.  FADR: Functional-Anatomical Discriminative Regions for Rest fMRI Characterization , 2015, MLMI.

[15]  F. Azuaje,et al.  Multiple SVM-RFE for gene selection in cancer classification with expression data , 2005, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[16]  Eduardo Alonso,et al.  Fusion of fMRI and non-imaging data for ADHD classification , 2017, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[17]  Chunyan Miao,et al.  3D CNN Based Automatic Diagnosis of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Using Functional and Structural MRI , 2017, IEEE Access.

[18]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Discordant attributes of structural and functional connectivity in a two-layer multiplex network , 2018, bioRxiv.