Predicting bacterial cause in infectious conjunctivitis: cohort study on informativeness of combinations of signs and symptoms

Abstract Objective To find an efficient set of diagnostic indicators that are optimally informative in the diagnosis of a bacterial origin of acute infectious conjunctivitis. Design Cohort study involving consecutive patients. Results of index tests and reference standard were collected independently from each other. Setting 25 Dutch health centres. Participants 184 adults presenting with a red eye and either (muco)purulent discharge or glued eyelid(s), not wearing contact lenses. Main outcome measures Probability of a positive bacterial culture, given different combinations of index test results; area under receiver operating characteristics curve. Results Logistic regression analysis showed optimal diagnostic discrimination for the combination of early morning glued eye(s), itch, and a history of conjunctivitis. The first of these indicators increased the likelihood of a bacterial cause, whereas the other two decreased it. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for this combination of symptoms was 0.74 (95% confidence interval 0.63 to 0.80). The overall prevalence of bacterial involvement of 32% could be lowered to 4% or raised to 77%, depending on the pattern of index test results. Conclusion A bacterial origin of complaints indicative of acute infectious conjunctivitis can be made much more likely or unlikely by the answers to three simple questions posed during clinical history taking (possibly by telephone). These results may have consequences for more targeted prescription of ocular antibiotics.

[1]  J. Baum,et al.  Emerging fluoroquinolone resistance in bacterial keratitis: A 5-year review , 1999 .

[2]  I. M. Okkes,et al.  Van klacht naar diagnose : episodegegevens uit de huisartspraktijk , 1998 .

[3]  P. Little,et al.  How do GPs diagnose and manage acute infective conjunctivitis? A GP survey. , 2002, Family practice.

[4]  I. Hørven Acute conjunctivitis , 1993, Acta ophthalmologica.

[5]  A. Agius-Fernandez,et al.  Topical Lomefloxacin versus Topical Chloramphenicol in the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Conjunctivitis , 1998, Clinical drug investigation.

[6]  J. Kanski Clinical Ophthalmology: A Systematic Approach , 1989 .

[7]  B. Hurwitz,et al.  Topical antibiotics for acute bacterial conjunctivitis: a systematic review. , 2001, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[8]  E. Brown,et al.  Fusidic acid resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates , 2002, The Lancet.

[9]  N. Orzalesi,et al.  Topical Lomefloxacin 0.3% Twice Daily versus Tobramycin 0.3% in Acute Bacterial Conjunctivitis: A Multicenter Double-Blind Phase III Study , 1999, Ophthalmologica.

[10]  F. Harrell,et al.  Prognostic/Clinical Prediction Models: Multivariable Prognostic Models: Issues in Developing Models, Evaluating Assumptions and Adequacy, and Measuring and Reducing Errors , 2005 .

[11]  T. Cook,et al.  The Safety and Efficacy of Topical Norfloxacin Compared with Placebo in the Treatment of Acute, Bacterial Conjunctivitis , 1992 .

[12]  J. Leyden,et al.  Bacterial resistance and therapeutic outcome following three months of topical acne therapy with 2% erythromycin gel versus its vehicle. , 2002, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[13]  M. Bertó Duane's Clinical Ophthalmology on CD-ROM, 2005 Edition CD-ROM , 2005 .

[14]  G. ter Riet,et al.  Diagnostic impact of signs and symptoms in acute infectious conjunctivitis: systematic literature search , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .