Biological Implications of Gene–Environment Interaction

Gene–environment interaction (G × E) has been treated as both a statistical phenomenon and a biological reality. It is argued that, although there are important statistical issues that need to be considered, the focus has to be on the biological implications of G × E. Four reports of G × E deriving from the Dunedin longitudinal study are used as exemplars of the biological considerations that should lead to an hypothesis-driven choice of the specific genetic polymorphisms and the specific environmental influence to be investigated. The same four studies are used to discuss how the assessment of internal and external validity can be undertaken and how experimental approaches in humans and with animal models may be informative in the elucidation of the relevant operative biological mechanisms.

[1]  Avshalom Caspi,et al.  Gene–environment interactions in psychiatry: joining forces with neuroscience , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[2]  M. Rutter The Psychological Effects of Early Institutional Rearing , 2006 .

[3]  M. Rutter Implications of Resilience Concepts for Scientific Understanding , 2006, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[4]  M. Egan,et al.  Serotonin Transporter Genetic Variation and the Response of the Human Amygdala , 2002, Science.

[5]  Theodore D. Wachs,et al.  Conceptualization and Measurement of Organism-Environment Interaction , 1991 .

[6]  A. Caspi,et al.  Role of Genotype in the Cycle of Violence in Maltreated Children , 2002, Science.

[7]  A. Caspi,et al.  MAOA, maltreatment, and gene–environment interaction predicting children's mental health: new evidence and a meta-analysis , 2006, Molecular Psychiatry.

[8]  M. Rutter,et al.  Effects of profound early institutional deprivation: An overview of findings from a UK longitudinal study of Romanian adoptees , 2007 .

[9]  A. Caspi,et al.  Moderation of breastfeeding effects on the IQ by genetic variation in fatty acid metabolism , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  M. Meaney,et al.  Environmental programming of stress responses through DNA methylation: life at the interface between a dynamic environment and a fixed genome , 2005, Dialogues in clinical neuroscience.

[11]  Gene-environment interaction: overcoming methodological challenges. , 2008, Novartis Foundation symposium.

[12]  J. Kim-Cohen,et al.  Meta-analysis of gene–environment interactions in developmental psychopathology , 2007, Development and Psychopathology.

[13]  Ahmad R. Hariri,et al.  Neural mechanisms of genetic risk for impulsivity and violence in humans , 2006 .

[14]  Michael Rutter,et al.  Introduction: whither gene-environment interactions? , 2008, Novartis Foundation symposium.

[15]  Nathan A. Fox,et al.  The development of social engagement : neurobiological perspectives , 2006 .

[16]  M. Rutter Conclusions: taking stock and looking ahead. , 2008, Novartis Foundation symposium.

[17]  K. Adamo,et al.  Gene-environment interaction and the metabolic syndrome. , 2008, Novartis Foundation symposium.

[18]  M. Rutter,et al.  Genes and behavior: nature-nurture interplay explained , 2006, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[19]  M. Rutter,et al.  Is sub‐nutrition necessary for a poor outcome following early institutional deprivation? , 2008, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[20]  Phil A. Silva,et al.  Sex differences in antisocial behaviour , 2006 .

[21]  M. Rutter,et al.  Gene-environment interdependence. , 2007, Developmental science.

[22]  A. Caspi,et al.  Moderation of the Effect of Adolescent-Onset Cannabis Use on Adult Psychosis by a Functional Polymorphism in the Catechol-O-Methyltransferase Gene: Longitudinal Evidence of a Gene X Environment Interaction , 2005, Biological Psychiatry.

[23]  J. Mill,et al.  Molecular studies of major depressive disorder: the epigenetic perspective , 2007, Molecular Psychiatry.

[24]  Avshalom Caspi,et al.  Using sex differences in psychopathology to study causal mechanisms: unifying issues and research strategies. , 2003, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[25]  Lindon J. Eaves,et al.  Genotype × Environment Interaction in Psychopathology: Fact or Artifact? , 2006, Twin Research and Human Genetics.

[26]  J. Os,et al.  An Experimental Study of Catechol-O-Methyltransferase Val158Met Moderation of Δ-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol-Induced Effects on Psychosis and Cognition , 2006, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[27]  A. Meyer-Lindenberg,et al.  5-HTTLPR polymorphism impacts human cingulate-amygdala interactions: a genetic susceptibility mechanism for depression , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  A. Caspi,et al.  Influence of Life Stress on Depression: Moderation by a Polymorphism in the 5-HTT Gene , 2003, Science.

[29]  Michael F Egan,et al.  A susceptibility gene for affective disorders and the response of the human amygdala. , 2005, Archives of general psychiatry.

[30]  Adrian Bird,et al.  Perceptions of epigenetics , 2007, Nature.

[31]  Michael Rutter,et al.  Person-environment interactions: Concepts, mechanisms, and implications for data analysis. , 1991 .

[32]  James Tabery Biometric and developmental gene–environment interactions: Looking back, moving forward , 2007, Development and Psychopathology.

[33]  N. Wray,et al.  Use of monozygotic twins to investigate the relationship between 5HTTLPR genotype, depression and stressful life events: an application of Item Response Theory. , 2008, Novartis Foundation symposium.