Interorganizational processes in buyer–supplier dyads: An information intensity perspective

ABSTRACT In an increasingly global business environment, organizations interact with partners, suppliers and customers who are geographically spread and exchange information regularly. Without a robust information technology infrastructure, the speed and effectiveness of this information exchange is limited. Business-to-business (B2B) electronic business applications are a class of interorganizational information systems (IOIS) that facilitate such information exchange arising out of interorganizational processes (IOPs). The success of any e-business initiative depends on the successful implementation and the actual use of such IOIS. This study uses the concept of information intensity (II) to identify the information sharing requirements arising from IOPs, thus presenting opportunities for B2B Web site use, with specific reference to organization-specific customer-facing and supplier-facing IOIS. We use data from four buyer–supplier dyads, eight medium- to large-scale organizations in the Indian context and identify a generic set of dominant IOPs in buyer–supplier interactions. Through these we present the sources of II in IOPs along three dimensions – complexity, uncertainty and ambiguity which influence the feature set in the IOISs. We conclude with implications for IOIS design, implementation and use.

[1]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies , 1987, CACM.

[2]  V. Grover An Empirically Derived Model for the Adoption of Customer‐based Interorganizational Systems* , 1993 .

[3]  Maria Madlberger,et al.  The Last Mile in an Electronic Commerce Business Model - Service Expectations of Austrian Online Shoppers , 2005, ECIS.

[4]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Inter-organizational information systems adoption – a configuration analysis approach , 2011, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[6]  Jaime Gómez,et al.  Firm Boundaries, Information Processing Capacity, and Performance in Manufacturing Firms , 2016, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[7]  G. Prem Premkumar,et al.  Interorganization Systems and Supply Chain Management: An Information Processing Perspective , 2000, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[8]  Clyde W. Holsapple,et al.  E-BUSINESS ADOPTION RESEARCH: STATE OF THE ART , 2013 .

[9]  R. Anthony,et al.  Planning and Control Systems: A Framework for Analysis , 1965 .

[10]  W. C. Benton,et al.  The influence of task- and location-specific complexity on the control and coordination costs in global outsourcing relationships , 2013 .

[11]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Measuring e-Commerce Success: Applying the DeLone & McLean Information Systems Success Model , 2004, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[12]  P. Fiala Information sharing in supply chains , 2005 .

[13]  Sanjiv D. Vaidya,et al.  RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONAL ADOPTION OFELECTRONIC COMMERCE: THE NEED FOR ANINTERDISCIPLINARY PERSPECTIVE , 2002 .

[14]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  Information sharing in a supply chain , 2000, Int. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag..

[15]  Sanjiv D. Vaidya,et al.  Research in organizational adoption of electronic commerce : the need for an interdisciplinary approach , 2002 .

[16]  Sean B. Eom An Introduction to Inter-Organizational Information Systems with Selected Bibliography , 2005 .

[17]  Akhil Kumar,et al.  Leveraging Information Sharing to Increase Supply Chain Configurability , 2003, ICIS.

[18]  J. B. Freiden,et al.  Changes on the Electronic Frontier: Growth and Opportunity of the World-Wide Web , 1998 .

[19]  Jay R. Galbraith Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[20]  Sean B. Eom Inter-organizational information systems in the Internet age , 2005 .

[21]  Yannis Bakos,et al.  A Strategic Analysis of Electronic Marketplaces , 1991, MIS Q..

[22]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[23]  Kyung Kyu Kim,et al.  Information transfer in B2B procurement: an empirical analysis and measurement , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[24]  William J. Kettinger,et al.  Selling in the era of the “Net”: integration of electronic commerce in small firms , 1997, ICIS '97.

[25]  Arvind K. Tripathi,et al.  How Do B2B Patterns Shape IOS Application Capabilities - The Moderating Effect on IT Capability Building , 2015, ECIS.

[26]  Bart van den Hooff,et al.  Through the Eyes of Others: How Onlookers Shape the Use of Technology at Work , 2017, MIS Q..

[27]  Line Dubé,et al.  Rigor in Information Systems Positivist Case Research: Current Practices , 2003, MIS Q..

[28]  Sanjiv D. Vaidya,et al.  Evolution of the Use of IT for e-Business at Century Financial Services:1 , 2002 .

[29]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  The Effects of Process Orientations on Collaboration Technology Use and Outcomes in Product Development , 2017, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[30]  M. Porter Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[31]  C. Perrow A FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ORGANIZATIONS , 1967 .

[32]  Sue Newell,et al.  Coping with Information Technology: Mixed Emotions, Vacillation, and Nonconforming Use Patterns , 2015, MIS Q..

[33]  Blake Ives,et al.  The information system as a competitive weapon , 1984, CACM.

[34]  Christian A. Ullrich Introduction to Supply Chain Management , 2014 .

[35]  R. Wood Task complexity: Definition of the construct , 1986 .

[36]  Monideepa Tarafdar,et al.  Understanding information exchange in healthcare operations: Evidence from hospitals and patients , 2015 .

[37]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Coordinating for Flexibility in e-Business Supply Chains , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[38]  Allen S. Lee A Scientific Methodology for MIS Case Studies , 1989, MIS Q..

[39]  Noor Azizi Ismail,et al.  The moderating role of trust in business to business electronic commerce (B2B EC) adoption , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[40]  Benn R. Konsynski,et al.  Uses and Consequences of Electronic Markets: An Empirical Investigation in the Aircraft Parts Industry , 1998, MIS Q..

[41]  Crystal Collins-Camargo,et al.  Institutional and Market Pressures on Interorganizational Collaboration and Competition Among Private Human Service Organizations , 2017 .

[42]  M. Porter,et al.  How Information Gives You Competitive Advantage , 1985 .

[43]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Configurations of inter-organizational relationships : a comparison between US and Japanese automakers , 1995 .

[44]  J. Pfeffer Organizations and Organization Theory , 1982 .

[45]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Research Commentary: Transformational Issues in Researching IS and Net-Enabled Organizations , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[46]  Michel Avital,et al.  Designing interviews to generate rich data for information systems research , 2011, Inf. Organ..

[47]  David A. Griffith,et al.  Information Intensity: A Paradigm for Understanding Web Site Design , 1998 .

[48]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Interfirm IT Capability Profiles and Communications for Cocreating Relational Value: Evidence from the Logistics Industry , 2012, MIS Q..

[49]  Robert Pellerin,et al.  Determinants of construction companies' use of web‐based interorganizational information systems , 2010 .

[50]  P. Daugherty,et al.  Defining and operationalizing supply chain process integration , 2009 .

[51]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .