The Application of Neural Networks and a Qualitative Response Model to the Auditor's Going Concern Uncertainty Decision*

An auditor gives a going concern uncertainty opinion when the client company is at risk of failure or exhibits other signs of distress that threaten its ability to continue as a going concern. The decision to issue a going concern opinion is an unstructured task that requires the use of the auditor's judgment. In cases where judgment is required, the auditor may benefit from the use of statistical analysis or other forms of decision models to support the final decision. This study uses the generalized reduced gradient (GRG2) optimizer for neural network learning, a backpropagation neural network, and a logit model to predict which firms would receive audit reports reflecting a going concern uncertainty modification. The GRG2 optimizer has previously been used as a more efficient optimizer for solving business problems. The neural network model formulated using GRG2 has the highest prediction accuracy of 95 percent. It performs best when tested with a small number of variables on a group of data sets, each containing 70 observations. While the logit procedure fails to converge when using our eight variable model, the GRG2 based neural network analysis provides consistent results using either eight or four variable models. The GRG2 based neural network is proposed as a robust alternative model for auditors to support their assessment of going concern uncertainty affecting the client company.

[1]  G. Maddala Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics: Introduction , 1983 .

[2]  Bryan K. Church,et al.  Default on Debt Obligations and the Issuance of Going-concern Opinions , 1992 .

[3]  Rupert G. Miller A Trustworthy Jackknife , 1964 .

[4]  John A. Elliott SUBJECT TO AUDIT OPINIONS AND ABNORMAL SECURITY RETURNS - OUTCOMES AND AMBIGUITIES , 1982 .

[5]  Gregory R. Madey,et al.  Integration of neurocomputing and system simulation for modeling continuous improvement systems in manufacturing , 1992, J. Intell. Manuf..

[6]  Kenneth W. Lemke,et al.  Economic determinants of accounting policy choice: The case of current cost accounting in the U.K , 1992 .

[7]  Venkat Subramanian,et al.  A GRG2-Based System for Training Neural Networks: Design and Computational Experience , 1993, INFORMS J. Comput..

[8]  Melody Y. Kiang,et al.  Managerial Applications of Neural Networks: The Case of Bank Failure Predictions , 1992 .

[9]  Ming S. Hung,et al.  Training neural networks with the GRG2 nonlinear optimizer , 1993 .

[10]  Thomas Kida AN INVESTIGATION INTO AUDITORS CONTINUITY AND RELATED QUALIFICATION JUDGMENTS , 1980 .

[11]  Jane F. Mutchler,et al.  A MULTIVARIATE-ANALYSIS OF THE AUDITORS GOING-CONCERN OPINION DECISION , 1985 .

[12]  R. Walker,et al.  Audit Qualifications and Share Prices , 1979 .

[13]  Kenneth B. Schwartz,et al.  An empirical investigation of audit qualification decisions in the presence of going concern uncertainties , 1987 .

[14]  Leon S. Lasdon,et al.  Design and Testing of a Generalized Reduced Gradient Code for Nonlinear Programming , 1978, TOMS.

[15]  Robert W. Holthausen,et al.  Qualified audit opinions and stock prices: Information content, announcement dates, and concurrent disclosures , 1984 .

[16]  James V. Hansen,et al.  Artificial Intelligence and Generalized Qualitative‐Response Models: An Empirical Test on Two Audit Decision‐Making Domains , 1992 .

[17]  James A. Ohlson FINANCIAL RATIOS AND THE PROBABILISTIC PREDICTION OF BANKRUPTCY , 1980 .

[18]  E. Mine Cinar,et al.  Neural Networks: A New Tool for Predicting Thrift Failures , 1992 .

[19]  Desmond Fletcher,et al.  Forecasting with neural networks: An application using bankruptcy data , 1993, Inf. Manag..

[20]  William D. Perreault,et al.  Validation of Discriminant Analysis in Marketing Research , 1977 .

[21]  Godwin J. Udo,et al.  Neural network performance on the bankruptcy classification problem , 1993 .

[22]  Timothy B. Bell,et al.  Empirical Analysis of Audit Uncertainty Qualifications , 1991 .

[23]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .