Measuring Students’ Information Literacy Skills through Abstracting: Case Study from a Library & Information Science Perspective

New education models based essentially on competencies and skills are gradually displacing the old systems based on teacher instruction and passive and memory-based learning in students, as these new competencies allow the student to learn actively with better levels of performance. We consider abstracting as a transcendent learning tool to analyze the basic role of information analysis and synthesis skills within the learning processes and their relation to the abstracting processes. Using an action-research methodology, we analyze the abstracting skill of students on the first and final courses of the Faculty of Library and Information Science at the University of Granada (Spain). Based on postulates from information literacy, analysis and synthesis competencies are studied through the students' modus operandi at the different abstracting stages. Similarities and differences between the two groups of students are perceived and displayed, with reference to the relation between the learned subjects and the levels of competence and skill. In the light of these results, meaningful patterns and recommendations for improving students' skill levels are proposed.

[1]  Susie Andretta,et al.  Information Literacy: A Practitioner's Guide , 2005 .

[2]  Sandy Campbell,et al.  DEFINING INFORMATION LITERACY IN THE 21ST CENTURY , 2004 .

[3]  John Elliott,et al.  Action research for educational change , 1991 .

[4]  E. Jacob,et al.  Sociocognitive perspectives on representation , 1998 .

[5]  S. Behrens.  A Conceptual Analysis and Historical Overview of Information Literacy , 1994 .

[6]  María Pinto Molina.  Documentary abstracting: toward a methodological model , 1995 .

[7]  Joanne Wade,et al.  Indexing and Abstracting in Theory and Practice (2nd ed.) , 1999 .

[8]  H. Lasswell.  The structure and function of communication in society , 2007 .

[9]  Maria Pinto,et al.  A grounded theory on abstracts quality: Weighting variables and attributes , 2006, Scientometrics.

[10]  Maria Pinto,et al.  Abstracting/abstract adaptation to digital environments: research trends , 2003, J. Documentation.

[11]  Peter Jan Schellens,et al.  Toward a document evaluation methodology: what does research tell us about the validity and reliability of evaluation methods? , 2000 .

[12]  David E. Avison,et al.  Controlling action research projects , 2001, Inf. Technol. People.

[13]  Patricia A Iannuzzi.  Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education , 2000 .

[14]  P. Maughan.  Assessing Information Literacy among Undergraduates: A Discussion of the Literature and the University of California-Berkeley Assessment Experience. , 2001 .

[15]  Why Action Research? The Leadership Role of the Library Media Specialist. , 2005 .

[16]  Carolyn J. Radcliff,et al.  Applying Systems Design and Item Response Theory to the Problem of Measuring Information Literacy Skills , 2002 .

[17]  Shiyali Ramamrita Ranganathan,et al.  Prolegomena to Library Classification , 1967 .

[18]  Sharon Markless,et al.  Gathering and applying evidence of the impact of UK university libraries on student learning and research: A facilitated action research approach , 2006, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[19]  Judy McKay,et al.  The dual imperatives of action research , 2001, Inf. Technol. People.