Managed Lanes Strategies Feasible for Freeway Ramp Applications

Current funding constraints and difficulty in gaining environmental and public approval for large-scale construction projects has forced the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) to continue considering alternative solutions to roadway widening to mitigate congestion. One area for potentially improving freeway performance is ramp locations. Current ramp treatments only address point demand. Applying managed lanes operational strategies to ramps could maximize existing capacity, manage demand, offer choices, improve safety, and generate revenue. This project investigates the application of these demand management strategies to mainlane ramps and managed lane ramp operations during the peak period; i.e., “managed ramps.” Such strategies could include peak-period use of both mainlane or managed lanes entrance and exit ramps by user group, possibly influencing mode choice, enhancing mobility, improving safety in a freeway corridor, and helping ensure the integrity and free-flow operations of a managed lanes facility. This research: (1) investigated under what conditions should managed ramps be considered for both mainlanes and managed lanes based on relevant factors including target users in the corridor, congestion level, ramp spacing/density, ramp volumes, accident history, etc.; (2) assessed the impacts and benefits of managed ramps; and (3) developed general guidelines and best practices for operating and enforcing managed ramps.

[1]  Leslie Jacobson,et al.  Ramp Management and Control Handbook , 2006 .

[2]  Steven D Schrock,et al.  TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR MANAGED LANES , 2004 .

[3]  Steven D Schrock,et al.  IDENTIFICATION OF TRAVELER INFORMATION AND DECISION-MAKING NEEDS FOR MANAGED LANE USERS , 2004 .

[4]  V G Stover,et al.  TRANSPORTATION AND LAND DEVELOPMENT. 2ND EDITION , 2002 .

[5]  Deborah L Jasek,et al.  Strategies for Separating Trucks from Passenger Vehicles: Final Report , 2006 .

[6]  Martin Wachs,et al.  Environmental Justice & Transportation: A Citizen's Handbook , 2003 .

[7]  Deborah L Jasek,et al.  Managed Lanes Handbook , 2005 .

[8]  Yi-Chang Chiu.  Development and Assessment of Peak­ Period Ramp Closure Strategies for Interstate Highways , 2004 .

[9]  Ginger Goodin,et al.  Managed Lanes: A Cross-Cutting Study , 2004 .

[10]  P DeCorla-Souza.  EXPANDING THE MARKET FOR VALUE PRICING , 2000 .

[11]  Zongzhong Tian,et al.  RAMP METERING ALGORITHMS AND APPROACHES FOR TEXAS , 2004 .

[12]  D Fenno,et al.  MANAGED LANES - TRAFFIC MODELING , 2002 .

[13]  Beverly Kuhn,et al.  ENFORCEMENT ISSUES ON MANAGED LANES , 2003 .

[14]  C J Messer,et al.  A DUAL-LANE FLOW SIGNAL PLAN FOR TEXAS , 1997 .

[15]  Robert E Brydia,et al.  INTEROPERABILITY ISSUES ON MANAGED LANES FACILITIES , 2005 .

[16]  William L Eisele,et al.  YEAR 1 ANNUAL REPORT OF PROGRESS: OPERATING FREEWAYS WITH MANAGED LANES , 2002 .

[17]  Ginger Goodin,et al.  DECISION FRAMEWORK FOR SELECTION OF MANAGED LANES STRATEGIES , 2005 .

[18]  James Robinson,et al.  RAMP METERING STATUS IN NORTH AMERICA. , 1989 .

[19]  D. Schrank,et al.  THE 2004 URBAN MOBILITY REPORT , 2002 .

[20]  Troy D. Abel,et al.  National Transportation Statistics 2000 , 2001 .

[21]  Louis G. Neudorff,et al.  FREEWAY MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS HANDBOOK , 2003 .

[22]  Jeffrey Shelton.  A dynamic modeling approach for applying managed lane strategies to freeway ramps , 2007 .