Mechanical properties of CFRP laminates manufactured from unidirectional prepregs using CSCNT-dispersed epoxy

This study presents the experimental results of the mechanical properties of three-phase CFRP laminates consisting of traditional carbon fibers and epoxy matrix modified using cup-stacked carbon nanotubes (CSCNTs) in comparison to those of CFRP laminates without CSCNTs. The prepreg system of carbon fibers impregnated with CSCNT-dispersed epoxy is developed, and successful fabrication of three-phase CFRP laminates is achieved using an autoclave. Basic mechanical properties of unidirectional laminates (stiffness, strength, fracture toughness, etc.) are summarized. Next, quasi-isotropic laminates are subjected to tension, compression, flexural, and compression after impact (CAI) tests. Improvement of stiffness and strength and no adverse effects on mechanical properties due to CSCNT dispersion are experimentally verified.

[1]  Marino Quaresimin,et al.  Glass-fibre-reinforced composites with enhanced mechanical and electrical properties – Benefits and limitations of a nanoparticle modified matrix , 2006 .

[2]  Toshio Kurauchi,et al.  Mechanical properties of nylon 6-clay hybrid , 1993 .

[3]  M. Dresselhaus,et al.  Structural characterization of cup-stacked-type nanofibers with an entirely hollow core , 2002 .

[4]  Arun K. Subramaniyan,et al.  Enhancing compressive strength of unidirectional polymeric composites using nanoclay , 2006 .

[5]  Tomohiro Yokozeki,et al.  Matrix cracking behaviors in carbon fiber/epoxy laminates filled with cup-stacked carbon nanotubes (CSCNTs) , 2007 .

[6]  K. Watson,et al.  Preparation and characterization of space durable polymer nanocomposite films , 2005 .

[7]  T. Ishikawa,et al.  Mechanical properties improvements in two-phase and three-phase composites using carbon nano-fiber dispersed resin , 2005 .

[8]  Bodo Fiedler,et al.  Influence of nano-modification on the mechanical and electrical properties of conventional fibre-reinforced composites , 2005 .

[9]  L. Schadler.  Polymer‐Based and Polymer‐Filled Nanocomposites , 2004 .

[10]  S. Hoa,et al.  Fracture toughness and water uptake of high-performance epoxy/nanoclay nanocomposites , 2005 .

[11]  T. Ishikawa,et al.  Helium gas permeability of montmorillonite/epoxy nanocomposites , 2006 .

[12]  Arshad Munir,et al.  Mode I interlaminar fracture behavior and mechanical properties of CFRPs with nanoclay-filled epoxy matrix , 2007 .

[13]  Jang‐Kyo Kim,et al.  Moisture barrier characteristics of organoclay-epoxy nanocomposites , 2005 .

[14]  Chuck Zhang,et al.  Fabrication and Characterization of Carbon Nanotube/Glass Fiber-Reinforced Multiscale Composites , 2006 .

[15]  T. Chou,et al.  Advances in the science and technology of carbon nanotubes and their composites: a review , 2001 .

[16]  P. Ajayan,et al.  Nanocomposite Science And Technology , 2003 .

[17]  M. Endo,et al.  Processing and characterization of epoxy nanocomposites reinforced by cup-stacked carbon nanotubes , 2005 .

[18]  J. Seferis,et al.  Nanoclay reinforcement effects on the cryogenic microcracking of carbon fiber/epoxy composites , 2002 .

[19]  D. Lagoudas,et al.  Processing and Characterization of Epoxy/SWCNT/Woven Fabric Composites , 2006 .

[20]  Bodo Fiedler,et al.  Influence of different carbon nanotubes on the mechanical properties of epoxy matrix composites – A comparative study , 2005 .