The influence of system settings on positioning accuracy in acoustic telemetry, using the YAPS algorithm

Background Acoustic positioning telemetry allows to collect large amounts of data on the movement of aquatic animals by use of autonomous receiver stations. Essential in this process is the conversion from raw signal detections to reliable positions. A new advancement in the domain is Yet Another Positioning Solver (YAPS), which combines the detection data on the receivers with a model of animal movement. This transparent, flexible and on-line available positioning algorithm overcomes problems related to traditional point-by-point positioning and filtering techniques. However, its performance has only been tested on data from one telemetry system, providing transmitters with stable burst interval. To investigate the performance of YAPS on different system parameters and settings, we conducted a simulation study. Results This paper discusses the effect of varying burst types, burst intervals, number of observations, reflectivity levels of the environment, levels of out-of-array positioning and temporal receiver resolution on positioning accuracy. We found that a receiver resolution better than 1 ms is required for accurate fine-scale positioning. The positioning accuracy of YAPS increases with decreasing burst intervals, especially when the number of observations is low, when reflectivity is high or when information out-of-array is used. However, when the burst interval is stable, large burst intervals (in the order of 1 to 2 min) can be chosen without strongly hampering the accuracy (although this results in information loss). With random burst intervals, the accuracy can be much improved if the random sequence is known. Conclusions As it turns out, the key to accurate positioning is the burst type. If a stable burst interval is not possible, the availability of the random sequence improves the positioning of random burst interval data significantly.

[1]  William White,et al.  Design of a Miniature Radio Transmitter for Use in Animal Studies , 1959 .

[2]  R. Lord,et al.  A RADIO-TRACKING SYSTEM FOR WILD ANIMALS , 1963 .

[3]  Arthur D. Hasler,et al.  An Ultrasonic Transmitter for Use in Studies of Movements of Fishes , 1966 .

[4]  G. Niezgoda,et al.  Tracking acoustic transmitters by code division multiple access (CDMA)-based telemetry , 2002 .

[5]  G. Niezgoda,et al.  Tracking acoustic transmitters by code division multiple access (CDMA)-based telemetry , 2002, Hydrobiologia.

[6]  Steven J. Cooke,et al.  Use of CDMA Acoustic Telemetry to Document 3-D Positions of Fish: Relevance to the Design and Monitoring of Aquatic Protected Areas , 2005 .

[7]  Angela B. Collins,et al.  Variation in the performance of acoustic receivers and its implication for positioning algorithms in a riverine setting , 2008 .

[8]  Michael P. Ward,et al.  Evaluation of Automated Radio Telemetry for Quantifying Movements and Home Ranges of Snakes , 2013 .

[9]  Greg DeCelles,et al.  Acoustic and Radio Telemetry , 2014 .

[10]  Kim Aarestrup,et al.  Comparison of the riverine and early marine migration behaviour and survival of wild and hatchery-reared sea trout Salmo trutta smolts , 2014 .

[11]  Niall Holmes,et al.  Acoustic properties of concrete panels with crumb rubber as a fine aggregate replacement , 2014 .

[12]  J. Kocik,et al.  Aquatic animal telemetry: A panoramic window into the underwater world , 2015, Science.

[13]  Kim Aarestrup,et al.  Survival and progression rates of anadromous brown trout kelts Salmo trutta during downstream migration in freshwater and at sea , 2015 .

[14]  Thomas R. Binder,et al.  Spatial and temporal variation in positioning probability of acoustic telemetry arrays: fine-scale variability and complex interactions , 2016, Animal Biotelemetry.

[15]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  A deforestation-induced tipping point for the South American monsoon system , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[16]  Finn Økland,et al.  Positioning of aquatic animals based on time-of-arrival and random walk models using YAPS (Yet Another Positioning Solver) , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[17]  Theodore Castro-Santos,et al.  Novel, continuous monitoring of fine‐scale movement using fixed‐position radiotelemetry arrays and random forest location fingerprinting , 2017 .

[18]  D. Bailey,et al.  Field testing a novel high residence positioning system for monitoring the fine‐scale movements of aquatic organisms , 2018, Methods in ecology and evolution.

[19]  Peter Goethals,et al.  Downstream migration of European eel (Anguilla anguilla L.) in an anthropogenically regulated freshwater system: Implications for management , 2018 .

[20]  Ingmar Nopens,et al.  The impact of intermediate-head navigation locks on downstream fish passage , 2019, River Research and Applications.

[21]  Finn Økland,et al.  Opening the black box of fish tracking using acoustic telemetry , 2019 .

[22]  Tomas Brodin,et al.  The old and the new: evaluating performance of acoustic telemetry systems in tracking migrating Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) smolt and European eel (Anguilla anguilla) around hydropower facilities , 2020 .

[23]  Ingmar Nopens,et al.  Acoustic positioning in a reflective environment: going beyond point-by-point algorithms , 2020, Animal Biotelemetry.