Ductile silica/methacrylate hybrids for bone regeneration.

Bioglass® was the first synthetic material capable of bonding with bone without fibrous encapsulation, and fulfils some of the criteria of an ideal synthetic bone graft. However, it is brittle and toughness is required. Here, we investigated hybrids consisting of co-networks of high cross-linking density polymethacrylate and silica (class II hybrid) as a potential new generation of scaffold materials. Poly(3-(methoxysilyl)propyl methacrylate) (pTMSPMA) and tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) were used as sol-gel precursors and hybrids were synthesised with different inorganic to organic ratios (Ih). The hybrids were nanoporous, with a modal pore diameter of 1 nm. At Ih = 50%, the release of silica was controlled by varying the molecular weight of pTMSPMA while retaining a specific surface area above 100 m2 g-1. Strain to failure increased to 14.2%, for Ih = 50% using a polymer of 30 kDa, compared to 4.5% for pure glass. The modulus of toughness (UT) increased from 0.73 (pure glass) to 2.64 GPa. Although, the hybrid synthesised in this report did not contain calcium, pTMSPMA/SiO2 hybrid was found to nucleate bone-like mineral on its surface after 1 week of immersion in simulated body fluid (SBF), whereas pure silica sol-gel glass did not. This increase in apatite forming ability was due to the ion-dipole complexation of calcium with the ester moieties of the polymer that were exposed after release of soluble silica from TEOS. No adverse cytotoxicity for MC3T3-E1 osteoblast-like cells was detected and improved cell attachment was observed, compared to a pure silica gel. pTMSPMA/SiO2 hybrids have potential for the regeneration of hard tissue as they overcome the major drawbacks of pure inorganic substrates while retaining cell attachment.

[1]  L. Bačáková,et al.  Nano-structured and functionalized surfaces for cytocompatibility improvement and bactericidal action. , 2015, Biotechnology advances.

[2]  Julian R. Jones,et al.  A structural and physical study of sol-gel methacrylate-silica hybrids: intermolecular spacing dictates the mechanical properties. , 2015, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[3]  Julian R. Jones,et al.  Toward Hybrid Materials: Group Transfer Polymerization of 3-(Trimethoxysilyl)propyl Methacrylate. , 2015, Macromolecular rapid communications.

[4]  C. R. Becer,et al.  RAFT Polymerization of N-[3-(Trimethoxysilyl)-propyl]acrylamide and Its Versatile Use in Silica Hybrid Materials. , 2015, Macromolecular rapid communications.

[5]  M. Márquez,et al.  Physiologically induced restructuring of focal adhesions causes mobilization of vinculin by a vesicular endocytic recycling pathway. , 2014, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[6]  A. Shamloo Cell‐cell interactions mediate cytoskeleton organization and collective endothelial cell chemotaxis , 2014, Cytoskeleton.

[7]  Nicola Maffulli,et al.  Bone regenerative medicine: classic options, novel strategies, and future directions , 2014, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

[8]  Dominik P. J. Barz,et al.  The zeta potential of PMMA in contact with electrolytes of various conditions: Theoretical and experimental investigation , 2014, Electrophoresis.

[9]  Julian R. Jones,et al.  Chemical characterisation and fabrication of chitosan-silica hybrid scaffolds with 3-glycidoxypropyl trimethoxysilane. , 2014, Journal of materials chemistry. B.

[10]  A. Elbaz,et al.  Patients with knee osteoarthritis demonstrate improved gait pattern and reduced pain following a non-invasive biomechanical therapy: a prospective multi-centre study on Singaporean population , 2014, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

[11]  M. Barbeck,et al.  Nanoscale chemical interaction enhances the physical properties of bioglass composites. , 2013, ACS nano.

[12]  G. Hilmas,et al.  Mechanical properties of bioactive glass (13-93) scaffolds fabricated by robotic deposition for structural bone repair. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[13]  J. Chang,et al.  Bioactive silicate materials stimulate angiogenesis in fibroblast and endothelial cell co-culture system through paracrine effect. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[14]  F. Dehghani,et al.  Molecular interactions in coupled PMMA-bioglass hybrid networks. , 2013, Journal of materials chemistry. B.

[15]  Ł. John,et al.  Non-cytotoxic organic-inorganic hybrid bioscaffolds: An efficient bedding for rapid growth of bone-like apatite and cell proliferation. , 2012, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[16]  Julian R. Jones,et al.  Bioactive silica–poly(γ-glutamic acid) hybrids for bone regeneration: effect of covalent coupling on dissolution and mechanical properties and fabrication of porous scaffolds , 2012 .

[17]  Julian R. Jones,et al.  Role of pH and temperature on silica network formation and calcium incorporation into sol–gel derived bioactive glasses , 2012 .

[18]  D. Arola,et al.  Infiltration of silica inside fibrillar collagen. , 2011, Angewandte Chemie.

[19]  Julian R. Jones,et al.  Protein interactions with nanoporous sol-gel derived bioactive glasses. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[20]  Julian R Jones,et al.  Melt-derived bioactive glass scaffolds produced by a gel-cast foaming technique. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[21]  Eduardo Saiz,et al.  Bioinspired Strong and Highly Porous Glass Scaffolds , 2011, Advanced functional materials.

[22]  Molly M. Stevens,et al.  Silica‐Gelatin Hybrids with Tailorable Degradation and Mechanical Properties for Tissue Regeneration , 2010 .

[23]  K. Kikuta,et al.  In vitro apatite formation on organic–inorganic hybrids in the CaO–SiO2–PO5/2–poly(tetramethylene oxide) system , 2010, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[24]  F. Szoka,et al.  Soluble polymer carriers for the treatment of cancer: the importance of molecular architecture. , 2009, Accounts of chemical research.

[25]  O. Reikerås,et al.  Review Article: Bone Transplantation and Immune Response , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic surgery.

[26]  Julian R. Jones,et al.  Differentiation of fetal osteoblasts and formation of mineralized bone nodules by 45S5 Bioglass conditioned medium in the absence of osteogenic supplements. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[27]  S. Rhee,et al.  The mechanical properties and bioactivity of poly(methyl methacrylate)/SiO(2)-CaO nanocomposite. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[28]  J. Robin,et al.  Kinetics of cotelomerization of 3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl methacrylate and perfluorodecylacrylate , 2009 .

[29]  M. Bohner,et al.  Can bioactivity be tested in vitro with SBF solution? , 2009, Biomaterials.

[30]  Julian R. Jones,et al.  Nanostructure evolution and calcium distribution in sol-gel derived bioactive glass , 2009 .

[31]  A. Cooper,et al.  pH-Responsive branched polymernanoparticles. , 2008, Soft matter.

[32]  Zainuddin,et al.  Preferential interactions of calcium ions in poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) hydrogels , 2007, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[33]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[34]  Joan E. Shields,et al.  Characterization of Porous Solids and Powders: Surface Area, Pore Size and Density , 2006 .

[35]  Julian R Jones,et al.  Optimising bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[36]  L. Hench,et al.  Preparation of bioactive glass-polyvinyl alcohol hybrid foams by the sol-gel method , 2005, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[37]  Larry L. Hench,et al.  Biomaterials, artificial organs and tissue engineering , 2005 .

[38]  K. Powers,et al.  Effect of pH and ionic strength on the reactivity of Bioglass 45S5. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[39]  F. D’Agosto,et al.  Block Copolymers of γ-Methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane and Methyl Methacrylate by RAFT Polymerization. A New Class of Polymeric Precursors for the Sol−Gel Process , 2005 .

[40]  Je-Yong Choi,et al.  Preparation of a Bioactive Poly(methyl methacrylate)/Silica Nanocomposite , 2004 .

[41]  Jianzhong Du,et al.  Atom-Transfer Radical Polymerization of a Reactive Monomer: 3-(Trimethoxysilyl)propyl Methacrylate , 2004 .

[42]  M. Tanihara,et al.  Synthesis of bioactive organic-inorganic nanohybrid for bone repair through sol-gel processing. , 2003, Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology.

[43]  Je-Yong Choi,et al.  Biological activities of osteoblasts on poly(methyl methacrylate)/silica hybrid containing calcium salt. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[44]  R. P. Thompson,et al.  Orthosilicic acid stimulates collagen type 1 synthesis and osteoblastic differentiation in human osteoblast-like cells in vitro. , 2003, Bone.

[45]  M. Tanihara,et al.  Development of bioactive organic–inorganic hybrid for bone substitutes , 2002 .

[46]  L L Hench,et al.  In vitro dissolution of melt-derived 45S5 and sol-gel derived 58S bioactive glasses. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[47]  A. Ridley,et al.  Cell migration in development and disease. , 2002, Developmental cell.

[48]  Antonia Martínez,et al.  Apatite nucleation on silica surface: A ζ potential approach , 2001 .

[49]  M. Schwartz,et al.  Integrins and cell proliferation: regulation of cyclin-dependent kinases via cytoplasmic signaling pathways. , 2001, Journal of cell science.

[50]  D. Ingber,et al.  Mechanical behavior in living cells consistent with the tensegrity model , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  L L Hench,et al.  Gene-expression profiling of human osteoblasts following treatment with the ionic products of Bioglass 45S5 dissolution. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[52]  L. Hench,et al.  Low-temperature synthesis, structure, and bioactivity of gel-derived glasses in the binary CaO-SiO2 system. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[53]  Larry L. Hench,et al.  Bioglass ®45S5 Stimulates Osteoblast Turnover and Enhances Bone Formation In Vitro: Implications and Applications for Bone Tissue Engineering , 2000, Calcified Tissue International.

[54]  P Zioupos,et al.  Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone. , 1998, Medical engineering & physics.

[55]  M Tanahashi,et al.  Surface functional group dependence on apatite formation on self-assembled monolayers in a simulated body fluid. , 1997, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[56]  Y. Einaga,et al.  Excluded-Volume Effects on the Hydrodynamic Radius of Atactic and Isotactic Oligo- and Poly(methyl methacrylate)s in Dilute Solution , 1996 .

[57]  Bruce M. Novak,et al.  Hybrid nanocomposite materials―between inorganic glasses and organic polymers , 1993 .

[58]  M. Wolcott Cellular solids: Structure and properties , 1990 .

[59]  K. Sing Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity (Recommendations 1984) , 1985 .

[60]  A. Burstein,et al.  The elastic modulus for bone. , 1974, Journal of biomechanics.

[61]  E. M. Carlisle Silicon: An Essential Element for the Chick , 1972, Science.

[62]  Larry L. Hench,et al.  Bonding mechanisms at the interface of ceramic prosthetic materials , 1971 .

[63]  E. Teller,et al.  ADSORPTION OF GASES IN MULTIMOLECULAR LAYERS , 1938 .

[64]  L. Canham,et al.  Silicon: the evolution of its use in biomaterials. , 2015, Acta biomaterialia.

[65]  Julian R. Jones,et al.  Exploring GPTMS reactivity against simple nucleophiles: chemistry beyond hybrid materials fabrication , 2014 .

[66]  E. Björn,et al.  Soluble silica inhibits osteoclast formation and bone resorption in vitro. , 2014, Acta biomaterialia.

[67]  Julian R Jones,et al.  Review of bioactive glass: from Hench to hybrids. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[68]  Martina H. Stenzel,et al.  Complex polymer architectures via RAFT polymerization: From fundamental process to extending the scope using click chemistry and nature's building blocks , 2012 .

[69]  M. Tanihara,et al.  Design of novel bioactive materials through organic modification of calcium silicate , 2007 .

[70]  M Y He,et al.  Mechanisms governing the inelastic deformation of cortical bone and application to trabecular bone. , 2006, Acta biomaterialia.

[71]  E. Hasselbrink,et al.  Zeta potential of microfluidic substrates: 2. Data for polymers , 2004, Electrophoresis.

[72]  L. Hench,et al.  Dose-dependent behavior of bioactive glass dissolution. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[73]  M. Ashby,et al.  Cellular solids: Structure & properties , 1988 .

[74]  S. Goldstein The mechanical properties of trabecular bone: dependence on anatomic location and function. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[75]  L. Gibson The mechanical behaviour of cancellous bone. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.