An Interactive Approach for Identifying Structure Definitions

Our ability to grasp and understand complex phenomena is essentially based on recognizing structures and relating these to each other. For example, any meteorological description of a weather condition and explanation of its evolution recurs to meteorological structures, such as convection and circulation structures, cloud fields and rain fronts. All of these are spatiotemporal structures, defined by time‐dependent patterns in the underlying fields. Typically, such a structure is defined by a verbal description that corresponds to the more or less uniform, often somewhat vague mental images of the experts. However, a precise, formal definition of the structures or, more generally, of the concepts is often desirable, e.g., to enable automated data analysis or the development of phenomenological models. Here, we present a systematic approach and an interactive tool to obtain formal definitions of spatiotemporal structures. The tool enables experts to evaluate and compare different structure definitions on the basis of data sets with time‐dependent fields that contain the respective structure. Since structure definitions are typically parameterized, an essential part is to identify parameter ranges that lead to desired structures in all time steps. In addition, it is important to allow a quantitative assessment of the resulting structures simultaneously. We demonstrate the use of the tool by applying it to two meteorological examples: finding structure definitions for vortex cores and center lines of temporarily evolving tropical cyclones.

[1]  P. Smolarkiewicz,et al.  Dynamics of tilted atmospheric vortices under asymmetric diabatic heating , 2021, Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics.

[2]  Johannes von Lindheim,et al.  Definition, detection, and tracking of persistent structures in atmospheric flows , 2021, 2111.13645.

[3]  M. Hadwiger,et al.  Vortex criteria can be objectivized by unsteadiness minimization , 2021, Physics of Fluids.

[4]  Natasa Djurdjevac Conrad,et al.  Mathematical modeling of spatio-temporal population dynamics and application to epidemic spreading , 2021, Mathematical Biosciences.

[5]  S. Zhang,et al.  A Second Wave? What Do People Mean by COVID Waves? – A Working Definition of Epidemic Waves , 2021, medRxiv.

[6]  Talha Bin Masood,et al.  Topology-Based Feature Design and Tracking for Multi-Center Cyclones , 2020, Mathematics and Visualization.

[7]  Ingrid Hotz,et al.  Feature Level-Sets: Generalizing Iso-Surfaces to Multi-Variate Data , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[8]  Vijay Natarajan,et al.  An Exploratory Framework for Cyclone Identification and Tracking , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[9]  P. Thagard,et al.  Concepts , 2019, Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies.

[10]  Chaoqun Liu,et al.  Determination of epsilon for Omega vortex identification method , 2018, Journal of Hydrodynamics.

[11]  Rüdiger Westermann,et al.  Robust Detection and Visualization of Jet-Stream Core Lines in Atmospheric Flow , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[12]  Mohammad Farazmand,et al.  A critical comparison of Lagrangian methods for coherent structure detection. , 2017, Chaos.

[13]  Brenden P. Epps Review of Vortex Identification Methods , 2017 .

[14]  Ivan Viola,et al.  A Fractional Cartesian Composition Model for Semi-Spatial Comparative Visualization Design , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[15]  Ayman El-Baz,et al.  Biomedical Image Segmentation : Advances and Trends , 2016 .

[16]  Chaoqun Liu,et al.  New omega vortex identification method , 2016 .

[17]  Jens H. Krüger,et al.  State of the Art in Transfer Functions for Direct Volume Rendering , 2016, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[18]  U. Ulbrich,et al.  Kinematic vorticity number – a tool for estimating vortex sizes and circulations , 2016 .

[19]  Huaqing Cai,et al.  Object-based evaluation of a numerical weather prediction model’s performance through forecast storm characteristic analysis , 2015 .

[20]  Manish Sharma,et al.  Mathematical Models on Epidemiology , 2015 .

[21]  G. Zängl,et al.  The ICON (ICOsahedral Non‐hydrostatic) modelling framework of DWD and MPI‐M: Description of the non‐hydrostatic dynamical core , 2015 .

[22]  Peter Gärdenfors,et al.  Applications of conceptual spaces : the case for geometric knowledge representation , 2015 .

[23]  Eduard Gröller,et al.  Cupid: Cluster-Based Exploration of Geometry Generators with Parallel Coordinates and Radial Trees , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[24]  J. Molinari,et al.  Evaluation of Tropical Cyclone Center Identification Methods in Numerical Models , 2014 .

[25]  Adam J. Clark,et al.  Application of Object-Based Time-Domain Diagnostics for Tracking Precipitation Systems in Convection-Allowing Models , 2014 .

[26]  R. Klein,et al.  Motion and structure of atmospheric mesoscale baroclinic vortices: dry air and weak environmental shear , 2012, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[27]  Hans-Christian Hege,et al.  Distillation and Visualization of Spatiotemporal Structures in Turbulent Flow Fields , 2011 .

[28]  Hans-Christian Hege,et al.  Positional Uncertainty of Isocontours: Condition Analysis and Probabilistic Measures , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[29]  Holger Theisel,et al.  The State of the Art in Topology‐Based Visualization of Unsteady Flow , 2011, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[30]  Robert A. Houze,et al.  Clouds in Tropical Cyclones , 2010 .

[31]  Min Chen,et al.  Over Two Decades of Integration‐Based, Geometric Flow Visualization , 2010, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[32]  Ernesto Bribiesca,et al.  An easy measure of compactness for 2D and 3D shapes , 2008, Pattern Recognit..

[33]  V. Kolár,et al.  Vortex identification: New requirements and limitations , 2007 .

[34]  Hans-Peter Seidel,et al.  A Unified Feature Extraction Architecture , 2007 .

[35]  Helwig Hauser,et al.  Interactive Focus+Context Analysis of Large, Time-Dependent Flow Simulation Data , 2006, Simul..

[36]  Uwe Ulbrich,et al.  Sensitivities of a cyclone detection and tracking algorithm: individual tracks and climatology , 2005 .

[37]  R. Adrian,et al.  On the relationships between local vortex identification schemes , 2005, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[38]  Hans-Christian Hege,et al.  Eurographics -ieee Vgtc Symposium on Visualization (2005) Galilean Invariant Extraction and Iconic Representation of Vortex Core Lines , 2022 .

[39]  T. D. Potter,et al.  Handbook of weather, climate, and water : dynamics, climate, physical meteorology, weather systems, and measurements , 2005 .

[40]  Hans-Christian Hege,et al.  amira: A Highly Interactive System for Visual Data Analysis , 2005, The Visualization Handbook.

[41]  Michael Mayer,et al.  Case study: visual analysis of complex, time-dependent simulation results of a diesel exhaust system , 2004, VISSYM'04.

[42]  Helwig Hauser,et al.  Interactive Feature Specification for Focus+Context Visualization of Complex Simulation Data , 2003, VisSym.

[43]  Joe Michael Kniss,et al.  Interactive volume rendering using multi-dimensional transfer functions and direct manipulation widgets , 2001, Proceedings Visualization, 2001. VIS '01..

[44]  J. Leger Menger curvature and rectifiability , 1999, math/9905212.

[45]  Michael W. Vannier,et al.  Biomedical image segmentation , 1998, Proceedings 1998 International Conference on Image Processing. ICIP98 (Cat. No.98CB36269).

[46]  P. Moin,et al.  Eddies, streams, and convergence zones in turbulent flows , 1988 .

[47]  H. Slotnick Summer program. , 1979, Journal of medical education.

[48]  Clifford Ambrose Truesdell,et al.  Two Measures of Vorticity , 1953 .

[49]  N. Foo Conceptual Spaces—The Geometry of Thought , 2022 .