Moving along the Number Line: Operational Momentum in Nonsymbolic Arithmetic

Can human adults perform arithmetic operations with large approximate numbers, and what effect, if any, does an internal spatial-numerical representation of numerical magnitude have on their responses? We conducted a psychophysical study in which subjects viewed several hundred short videos of sets of objects being added or subtracted from one another and judged whether the final numerosity was correct or incorrect. Over a wide range of possible outcomes, the subjects’ responses peaked at the approximate location of the true numerical outcome and gradually tapered off as a function of the ratio of the true and proposed outcomes (Weber’s law). Furthermore, an operational momentum effect was observed, whereby addition problems were overestimated and subtraction problems were underestimated. The results show that approximate arithmetic operates according to precise quantitative rules, perhaps analogous to those characterizing movement on an internal continuum.

[1]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[2]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  The neural basis of the Weber–Fechner law: a logarithmic mental number line , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  E. Spelke,et al.  Language and Conceptual Development series Core systems of number , 2004 .

[4]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Two mental calculation systems: A case study of severe acalculia with preserved approximation , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  S. Dehaene Symbols and quantities in parietal cortex: elements of a mathematical theory of number representation and manipulation , 2007 .

[6]  Rochel Gelman,et al.  Variability signatures distinguish verbal from nonverbal counting for both large and small numbers , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  Jörg Lewald,et al.  Representational Momentum in Spatial Hearing , 2004, Perception.

[8]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Dynamic representations underlying symbolic and nonsymbolic calculation: Evidence from the operational momentum effect , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[9]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. , 1998 .

[10]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Preverbal and verbal counting and computation , 1992, Cognition.

[11]  F. Restle Speed of Adding and Comparing Numbers. , 1970 .

[12]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Nonverbal Counting in Humans: The Psychophysics of Number Representation , 1999 .

[13]  E. Spelke,et al.  Sources of mathematical thinking: behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. , 1999, Science.

[14]  E. Spelke,et al.  Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants , 2000, Cognition.

[15]  John R. Platt,et al.  Localization of position within a homogeneous behavior chain: Effects of error contingencies , 1971 .

[16]  S. Dehaene,et al.  THREE PARIETAL CIRCUITS FOR NUMBER PROCESSING , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[17]  C R Gallistel,et al.  Numerical Subtraction in the Pigeon: Evidence for a Linear Subjective Number Scale , 2001, Psychological science.

[18]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Exact and Approximate Arithmetic in an Amazonian Indigene Group , 2004, Science.

[19]  永福 智志 The Organization of Learning , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  Karen Wynn,et al.  Addition and subtraction by human infants , 1992, Nature.

[21]  S. Dehaene Varieties of numerical abilities , 1992, Cognition.

[22]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Non-symbolic arithmetic in adults and young children , 2006, Cognition.

[23]  K. Priftis,et al.  Brain damage: Neglect disrupts the mental number line , 2002, Nature.

[24]  T. Hubbard Representational momentum and related displacements in spatial memory: A review of the findings , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  Elizabeth S Spelke,et al.  Origins of Number Sense , 2003, Psychological science.

[26]  Jonathan I. Flombaum,et al.  Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) spontaneously compute addition operations over large numbers , 2005, Cognition.

[27]  E. Spelke,et al.  The construction of large number representations in adults , 2003, Cognition.

[28]  P. G. Vos,et al.  A probabilistic model for the discrimination of visual number , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  Elizabeth M. Brannon,et al.  Nonverbal representations of time and number in animals and human infants. , 2003 .

[30]  Hilary Barth,et al.  Abstract number and arithmetic in preschool children. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[32]  S. Dehaene Subtracting Pigeons: Logarithmic or Linear? , 2001, Psychological science.

[33]  M. H. Kelly,et al.  Representational momentum in memory for pitch. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[34]  E. Miller,et al.  Coding of Cognitive Magnitude Compressed Scaling of Numerical Information in the Primate Prefrontal Cortex , 2003, Neuron.

[35]  M. Reitman,et al.  Site-independent expression of the chicken βA-globin gene in transgenic mice , 1990, Nature.

[36]  K. Wynn,et al.  Large-Number Addition and Subtraction by 9-Month-Old Infants , 2004, Psychological science.

[37]  H. Ashida Action-specific extrapolation of target motion in human visual system , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[38]  R. Church,et al.  A mode control model of counting and timing processes. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[39]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Single-trial classification of parallel pre-attentive and serial attentive processes using functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  M. Ashcraft,et al.  Menatal addition: A test of three verification models , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[41]  Michael D. Dodd,et al.  Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[42]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Approximate quantities and exact number words: dissociable systems , 2003, Neuropsychologia.