Generating text from compressed input: an intelligent interface for people with severe motor impairments

Computers and computer-based technology have become an integral part of the lives of many individuals with disabilities. One of the most common activities that can be computer assisted is the generation of text. People who cannot accurately control their extremities (due to disabilities such as cerebral palsy and spinal cord injury) use computers as writing tools. People whose physical disability restricts their spoken output may use a computer as a communication prosthesis. In both cases, the generation of text is a necessary activity that can be physically demanding. It should be made as easy for the user as possible. While the standard computer keyboard is an efficient interface for able-bodied people and some disabled people, it may present significant access problems for others. In these cases some alternative interface is necessary.

[1]  H. B. Allen,et al.  A Functional Grammar , 1946 .

[2]  C. Fillmore The case for case reopened , 1977 .

[3]  David D. McDonald Natural language production as a process of decision-making under constraints , 1980 .

[4]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Language as a cognitive process 1: Syntax , 1982 .

[5]  Chuck Rieger,et al.  Parsing and comprehending with word experts (a theory and its realization) , 1982 .

[6]  Elaine Marsh,et al.  Analysis And Processing Of Compact Text , 1982, COLING.

[7]  Wendy G. Lehnert,et al.  Strategies for Natural Language Processing , 1982 .

[8]  Douglas E. Appelt TELEGRAM: A Grammar Formalism for Language Planning , 1983, IJCAI.

[9]  Elaine Marsh,et al.  Utilizing Domain-Specific Information For Processing Compact Text , 1983, ANLP.

[10]  Lance A. Miller,et al.  Parse Fitting and Prose Fixing: Getting a Hold on III-Formedness , 1983, Am. J. Comput. Linguistics.

[11]  Norman K. Sondheimer,et al.  Meta-Rules as a Basis for Processing III-Formed Input , 1983, Am. J. Comput. Linguistics.

[12]  Jaime G. Carbonell,et al.  Recovery Strategies for Parsing Extragrammatical Language , 1983, CL.

[13]  Yorick Wilks,et al.  Preference Semantics, III-Formedness, and Metaphor , 1983, Am. J. Comput. Linguistics.

[14]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Language as a Cognitive Process , 1983, CL.

[15]  Richard Granger The NOMAD System: Expectation-Based Detection and Correction of Errors During Understanding of Syntactically and Semantically III-Formed Text , 1983, Am. J. Comput. Linguistics.

[16]  Sergei Nirenburg,et al.  Review of Language as a cognitive process: volume 1 syntax by T. Winograd. Addison-Wesley 1983. , 1983 .

[17]  William C. Mann,et al.  Nigel: A Systemic Grammar for Text Generation. , 1983 .

[18]  Elaine Marsh,et al.  A Computational Analysis of Complex Noun Phrases in Navy Messages , 1984, ACL.

[19]  John L. Arnott,et al.  Adaptive and predictive communication aid for the disabled exploits the redundancy in natural language. , 1984 .

[20]  Martin Kay,et al.  Parsing in functional unification grammar , 1986 .

[21]  Martha Stone Palmer,et al.  Driving semantics for a limited domain , 1985 .

[22]  Kathleen McKeown,et al.  Discourse Strategies for Generating Natural-Language Text , 1985, Artif. Intell..

[23]  Michael Halliday,et al.  An Introduction to Functional Grammar , 1985 .

[24]  MilneRobert,et al.  Resolving Lexical Ambiguity in a Deterministc Parser , 1986, Comput. Linguistics.

[25]  Karen Spärck Jones,et al.  Readings in natural language processing , 1986 .

[26]  Alan F. Newell,et al.  The use of syntax in a predictive communication aid for the physically handicapped , 1987 .

[27]  James F. Allen Natural language understanding , 1987, Bejnamin/Cummings series in computer science.

[28]  S. McNaughton Gaining the most from AAC's growing years , 1990 .

[29]  Kathleen F. McCoy,et al.  Applying Natural Language Processing Techniques to Augmentative Communication Systems , 1990, COLING.

[30]  Graeme Hirst,et al.  Semantic Interpretation and the Resolution of Ambiguity , 1987, Studies in natural language processing.