Large-scale brain network coupling predicts acute nicotine abstinence effects on craving and cognitive function.

IMPORTANCE Interactions of large-scale brain networks may underlie cognitive dysfunctions in psychiatric and addictive disorders. OBJECTIVES To test the hypothesis that the strength of coupling among 3 large-scale brain networks--salience, executive control, and default mode--will reflect the state of nicotine withdrawal (vs smoking satiety) and will predict abstinence-induced craving and cognitive deficits and to develop a resource allocation index (RAI) that reflects the combined strength of interactions among the 3 large-scale networks. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A within-subject functional magnetic resonance imaging study in an academic medical center compared resting-state functional connectivity coherence strength after 24 hours of abstinence and after smoking satiety. We examined the relationship of abstinence-induced changes in the RAI with alterations in subjective, behavioral, and neural functions. We included 37 healthy smoking volunteers, aged 19 to 61 years, for analyses. INTERVENTIONS Twenty-four hours of abstinence vs smoking satiety. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Inter-network connectivity strength (primary) and the relationship with subjective, behavioral, and neural measures of nicotine withdrawal during abstinence vs smoking satiety states (secondary). RESULTS The RAI was significantly lower in the abstinent compared with the smoking satiety states (left RAI, P = .002; right RAI, P = .04), suggesting weaker inhibition between the default mode and salience networks. Weaker inter-network connectivity (reduced RAI) predicted abstinence-induced cravings to smoke (r = -0.59; P = .007) and less suppression of default mode activity during performance of a subsequent working memory task (ventromedial prefrontal cortex, r = -0.66, P = .003; posterior cingulate cortex, r = -0.65, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Alterations in coupling of the salience and default mode networks and the inability to disengage from the default mode network may be critical in cognitive/affective alterations that underlie nicotine dependence.

[1]  I. Melle,et al.  The validity of d prime as a working memory index: Results from the “Bergen n-back task” , 2010, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[2]  Kenneth Hugdahl,et al.  Prediction of human errors by maladaptive changes in event-related brain networks , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Yihong Yang,et al.  Nicotine Enhances Visuospatial Attention by Deactivating Areas of the Resting Brain Default Network , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  M. Fox,et al.  Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[5]  K. Fagerström.  Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence , 1995 .

[6]  D. Sheehan,et al.  The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. , 1998, The Journal of clinical psychiatry.

[7]  Xi-Nian Zuo,et al.  Reliable intrinsic connectivity networks: Test–retest evaluation using ICA and dual regression approach , 2010, NeuroImage.

[8]  Yihong Yang,et al.  Implicit reference-based group-wise image registration and its application to structural and functional MRI , 2009, NeuroImage.

[9]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  Steven Siegel,et al.  Working memory deficits predict short-term smoking resumption following brief abstinence. , 2010, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[11]  B. Wexler,et al.  Neuropsychological deficits are associated with smoking cessation treatment failure in patients with schizophrenia , 2004, Schizophrenia Research.

[12]  Eric Nyberg,et al.  Nicotine effects on default mode network during resting state , 2011, Psychopharmacology.

[13]  L. Kozlowski,et al.  The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire. , 1991, British journal of addiction.

[14]  M F Huque,et al.  Some comments on frequently used multiple endpoint adjustment methods in clinical trials. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[15]  D. Drobes,et al.  Nicotine self‐medication of cognitive‐attentional processing , 2009, Addiction biology.

[16]  V. Menon,et al.  Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula function , 2010, Brain Structure and Function.

[17]  T. Hergueta,et al.  The mini international neuropsychiatric interview , 1998, European Psychiatry.

[18]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Probabilistic independent component analysis for functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  Mark A. Elliott,et al.  Impact of in-scanner head motion on multiple measures of functional connectivity: Relevance for studies of neurodevelopment in youth , 2012, NeuroImage.

[20]  S. David,et al.  Biomarkers for Smoking Cessation , 2013, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[21]  James Loughead,et al.  Varenicline Improves Mood and Cognition During Smoking Abstinence , 2009, Biological Psychiatry.

[22]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  Y. Zang,et al.  Intrinsic resting‐state activity predicts working memory brain activation and behavioral performance , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[24]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Lateralized Cognitive Processes and Lateralized Task Control in the Human Brain , 2003, Science.

[25]  D. Hatsukami,et al.  Effect of nicotine on the tobacco withdrawal syndrome , 1984, Psychopharmacology.

[26]  Gereon R. Fink,et al.  Mechanisms of hemispheric specialization: Insights from analyses of connectivity , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[28]  Richard C. Taylor,et al.  Dose-Related Enhancement of Mood and Cognition in Smokers Administered Nicotine Nasal Spray , 2008, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[29]  Bradley S Peterson,et al.  Antidepressants normalize the default mode network in patients with dysthymia. , 2013, JAMA psychiatry.

[30]  E. Stein,et al.  Multiple Neuronal Networks Mediate Sustained Attention , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  G L Shulman,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:A default mode of brain function , 2001 .

[32]  Evaluation of the brief questionnaire of smoking urges (QSU-brief) in laboratory and clinical settings. , 2001 .

[33]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion , 2012, NeuroImage.

[34]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  Effect of dopamine transporter genotype on intrinsic functional connectivity depends on cognitive state. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[35]  G. Glover,et al.  Dissociable Intrinsic Connectivity Networks for Salience Processing and Executive Control , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  L. Cox,et al.  Evaluation of the brief questionnaire of smoking urges (QSU-brief) in laboratory and clinical settings. , 2001, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[37]  Wang Zhan,et al.  Group independent component analysis reveals consistent resting-state networks across multiple sessions , 2008, Brain Research.

[38]  Jason R. Tregellas,et al.  Nicotine increases brain functional network efficiency , 2012, NeuroImage.

[39]  M. Mintun,et al.  Resting-state functional MRI in depression unmasks increased connectivity between networks via the dorsal nexus , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  The influence of head motion on intrinsic functional connectivity MRI , 2012, NeuroImage.

[41]  S. Rombouts,et al.  Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  V. Menon.  Large-scale brain networks and psychopathology: a unifying triple network model , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[44]  V. Menon,et al.  A critical role for the right fronto-insular cortex in switching between central-executive and default-mode networks , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  G. Shulman,et al.  Medial prefrontal cortex and self-referential mental activity: Relation to a default mode of brain function , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  Kosha Ruparel,et al.  Effects of the α4β2 Partial Agonist Varenicline on Brain Activity and Working Memory in Abstinent Smokers , 2010, Biological Psychiatry.

[47]  Jérôme Prado,et al.  Variations of response time in a selective attention task are linked to variations of functional connectivity in the attentional network , 2011, NeuroImage.

[48]  Elliot A. Stein,et al.  Resting state functional connectivity in addiction: Lessons learned and a road ahead , 2012, NeuroImage.

[49]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  M. Fox,et al.  The global signal and observed anticorrelated resting state brain networks. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[51]  Conor Liston,et al.  Atypical Prefrontal Connectivity in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Pathway to Disease or Pathological End Point? , 2011, Biological Psychiatry.