The Strengthened Business Process Matrix – A Novel Approach for Guided Continuous Improvement at Service‐Oriented SMEs

The principle of continuous improvement is widely used at firms when striving for improved business performance. One goal that is typically sought in terms of continuous improvement is the achievement of consistent operations within business processes. Despite the commonness of this approach, firms often face business process-related problems. This paper introduces an approach to improve the quality and the feasibility of business processes at small-sized and medium-sized service-oriented firms. The approach is based on the analysis of observations gathered at four case companies over 25 years. In the study, business processes were grouped into three categories: (i) strategic steering tool-related procedures without business process descriptions; (ii) operative service component-related business processes; and (iii) the business process matrix, including general descriptions for (a) the operative processes of daily activities, special occasions, and life-cycle management and (b) the steering processes of entity management. The feasibility of the business process matrix was strengthened by interrelating the redetermined steering tools, that is, service promise, service portfolio, principles, and organization. The strengthened business process matrix is an example of guided continuous improvement, meaning that the role of the organization is to apply the content of the strengthened business matrix rather than to create it from nothing, by trial and error, or from diverse sources. The main contribution of this study to business process research is in combining a scientific perspective with the actual needs of service-oriented small-sized and medium-sized firms, based on a quarter-century-long insight into their management and working practices. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Jan Mendling,et al.  What Makes Process Models Understandable? , 2007, BPM.

[2]  Douglas K. Macbeth,et al.  Review of Services Science and possible application in rail maintenance , 2010 .

[3]  Dante Pinheiro Martinelli,et al.  Business process management: a systemic approach? , 2013, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[4]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Problems and Strategies in Services Marketing , 1985 .

[5]  Injun Choi,et al.  Creating a Process and Organization Fit Index: an Approach toward Optimal Process and Organization Design , 2013 .

[6]  Heitor Mansur Caulliraux,et al.  Process management tasks: a conceptual and practical view , 2008, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[7]  Anu Bask,et al.  Matching service strategies, business models and modular business processes , 2010, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[8]  Kevin W. Linderman,et al.  Process management, innovation and efficiency performance: The moderating effect of competitive intensity , 2014, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[9]  Jan Mendling,et al.  Metrics for Business Process Models , 2008 .

[10]  Markus Kohlbacher,et al.  Process orientation: conceptualization and measurement , 2011, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[11]  Helmut Krcmar,et al.  Which capabilities matter for successful business process change? , 2014, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[12]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Factors and measures of business process modelling: model building through a multiple case study , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[13]  C. Ranganathan,et al.  A survey of business process reengineering practices in Singapore , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[14]  Markus Kohlbacher,et al.  Business Process Management Journal The effects of process orientation : a literature review , 2015 .

[15]  Jan Recker,et al.  Ten principles of good business process management , 2014, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[16]  Björn Niehaves,et al.  BPM capability development - a matter of contingencies , 2014, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[17]  James C. Spohrer,et al.  A research manifesto for services science , 2006, CACM.

[18]  Arijit Sikdar,et al.  A process model of managing organizational change during business process redesign , 2014, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[19]  Markus Kohlbacher,et al.  The Impact of Dynamic Capabilities through Continuous Improvement on Innovation: the Role of Business Process Orientation , 2013 .

[20]  Gregor Zellner,et al.  A structured evaluation of business process improvement approaches , 2011, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[21]  Thilini Ariyachandra,et al.  Critical Success Factors in Business Performance Management—Striving for Success , 2008, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[22]  Satish Nambisan,et al.  Why Service Businesses Are Not Product Businesses , 2001 .

[23]  Angelo Corallo,et al.  Guidelines of a Unified Approach for Product and Business Process Modeling in Complex Enterprise , 2011 .

[24]  Michael Glykas Performance Measurement in Business Process, Workflow and Human Resource Management: Performance Measurement in HR Management , 2011 .

[25]  Michael Glykas,et al.  Effort based performance measurement in business process management , 2011 .

[26]  Jan Mendling,et al.  Detection and prediction of errors in EPC business process models , 2007 .

[27]  Charbel José Chiappetta Jabbour,et al.  BPM for change management: two process diagnosis techniques , 2014, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[28]  Thomas Neubauer,et al.  An empirical study about the status of business process management , 2009, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[29]  André Lucirton Costa,et al.  An analysis of BPM lifecycles: from a literature review to a framework proposal , 2014, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[30]  João Barata,et al.  MUVE IT: reduce the friction in business processes , 2014, Bus. Process. Manag. J..