Modularity of cellular networks shows general center-periphery polarization

The modular biology is supposed to be a bridge from the molecular to the systems biology. Using a new approach, it is shown here that the protein interaction networks of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and bacteria Escherichia coli consist of two large-scale modularity layers, central and peripheral, separated by a zone of depressed modularity. This finding based on the analysis of network topology is further supported by the discovery that there are many more Gene Ontology categories (terms) and KEGG biochemical pathways that are overrepresented in the central and peripheral layers than in the intermediate zone. The categories of the central layer are mostly related to nuclear information processing, regulation and cell cycle, whereas the peripheral layer is dealing with various metabolic and energetic processes, transport and cell communication. A similar center-periphery polarization of modularity is found in the protein domain networks ('built-in interactome') and in a powergrid (as a non-biological example). These data suggest a 'polarized modularity' model of cellular networks where the central layer seems to be regulatory and to use information storage of the nucleus, whereas the peripheral layer seems devoted to more specialized tasks and environmental interactions, with a complex 'bus' between the layers.

[1]  L. Holm,et al.  The Pfam protein families database , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[2]  E. Birney,et al.  Pfam: the protein families database , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[3]  Tobias Müller,et al.  Identifying functional modules in protein–protein interaction networks: an integrated exact approach , 2008, ISMB.

[4]  Yoshihiro Yamanishi,et al.  KEGG for linking genomes to life and the environment , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[5]  Giorgio Valle,et al.  The Gene Ontology project in 2008 , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[6]  Haifeng Li,et al.  Systematic discovery of functional modules and context-specific functional annotation of human genome , 2007, ISMB/ECCB.

[7]  M. Tyers,et al.  Still Stratus Not Altocumulus: Further Evidence against the Date/Party Hub Distinction , 2007, PLoS biology.

[8]  S. Ivakhno.  From functional genomics to systems biology , 2007, The FEBS journal.

[9]  Jianzhi Zhang,et al.  In Search of the Biological Significance of Modular Structures in Protein Networks , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[10]  K. Komurov,et al.  Revealing static and dynamic modular architecture of the eukaryotic protein interaction network , 2007, Molecular Systems Biology.

[11]  Robert D. Finn,et al.  New developments in the InterPro database , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[12]  Christian von Mering,et al.  STRING 7—recent developments in the integration and prediction of protein interactions , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[13]  Tatiana A. Tatusova,et al.  Entrez Gene: gene-centered information at NCBI , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[14]  Alfonso Valencia,et al.  Modular organization in the reductive evolution of protein-protein interaction networks , 2007, Genome Biology.

[15]  A. Vinogradov.  ‘Genome design’ model and multicellular complexity: golden middle , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[16]  M. Tyers,et al.  Stratus Not Altocumulus: A New View of the Yeast Protein Interaction Network , 2006, PLoS biology.

[17]  Andrey A Mironov,et al.  A metabolic network in the evolutionary context: multiscale structure and modularity. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Jing Zhao,et al.  Hierarchical modularity of nested bow-ties in metabolic networks , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[19]  P. Bork,et al.  Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery , 2006, Nature.

[20]  Michael E. Cusick,et al.  Yeast Protein Interactome topology provides framework for coordinated-functionality , 2006 .

[21]  U. Alon,et al.  Spontaneous evolution of modularity and network motifs. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  J. Collado-Vides,et al.  Modular analysis of the transcriptional regulatory network of E. coli. , 2005, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[23]  Jennifer Hallinan,et al.  Gene duplication and hierarchical modularity in intracellular interaction networks. , 2004, Bio Systems.

[24]  M. Vidal,et al.  Integrating 'omic' information: a bridge between genomics and systems biology. , 2003, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[25]  Alexander Rives,et al.  Modular organization of cellular networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Hierarchical Organization of Modularity in Metabolic Networks , 2002, Science.

[27]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry , 2002, Nature.

[28]  P. Bork,et al.  Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes , 2002, Nature.

[29]  Hierarchical Organization of Modularity in Metabolic Networks Supporting Online Material , 2002 .

[30]  J. Hopfield,et al.  From molecular to modular cell biology , 1999, Nature.

[31]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.