A novel coextinction model considering compensation and new interactions in ecological networks

Abstract The robustness of communities to species loss is a major topic in ecological research. Here, we introduce the Dependent random-search Coextinction Model (DCM), a new approach for modelling the consequences of primary extinctions in ecological networks. The DCM assumes that species may persist after a primary extinction through two non-exclusive mechanisms: compensation (i.e., by increasing the interaction strength with living partners) and new interactions. In the DCM, the strengths of the compensated interactions are proportional to the dependence on the lost partner, while the strengths of new interactions are proportional to the resemblance (e.g. phylogenetic, functional) between the extinct partners and the new ones. Using simulations with mutualistic webs as templates, we show that the probability of extinction cascades and the total number of extinctions decrease in highly connected networks, and the probability of extinction cascades increased in highly nested networks. The proposed model is simple and can be used in a variety of interaction networks (e.g. mutualistic, food webs, host-parasite), with any species-species resemblances representing ecological or evolutionary dissimilarities.

[1]  Ulrich Brose,et al.  Robustness to secondary extinctions: Comparing trait-based sequential deletions in static and dynamic food webs , 2011 .

[2]  Owen L. Petchey,et al.  Adaptive foraging and the rewiring of size-structured food webs following extinctions , 2011 .

[3]  Michael J. O. Pocock,et al.  The robustness of a network of ecological networks to habitat loss. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[4]  Carsten F. Dormann,et al.  Introducing the bipartite Package: Analysing Ecological Networks , 2008 .

[5]  Carlos J. Melián,et al.  The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Henrique M. Pereira,et al.  Spatial scaling of extinction rates: Theory and data reveal nonlinearity and a major upscaling and downscaling challenge , 2018 .

[7]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Structure and Dynamics of Ecological Networks , 2010, Science.

[8]  Amedeo Caflisch,et al.  The robustness of pollination networks to the loss of species and interactions: a quantitative approach incorporating pollinator behaviour. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[9]  Ruben H. Heleno,et al.  Fine‐tuning the nested structure of pollination networks by adaptive interaction switching, biogeography and sampling effect in the Galápagos Islands , 2019, Oikos.

[10]  Ulrich Brose,et al.  The susceptibility of species to extinctions in model communities , 2011 .

[11]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  A consistent metric for nestedness analysis in ecological systems: reconciling concept and measurement , 2008 .

[12]  Colin Fontaine,et al.  Stability of Ecological Communities and the Architecture of Mutualistic and Trophic Networks , 2010, Science.

[13]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Ecological networks, nestedness and sampling effort , 2007 .

[14]  Richard James,et al.  Temporal dynamics and network analysis , 2012 .

[15]  Anna Eklöf,et al.  Species loss and secondary extinctions in simple and complex model communities. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[16]  D. Sanders,et al.  The loss of indirect interactions leads to cascading extinctions of carnivores. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[17]  Cang Hui,et al.  An interaction switch predicts the nested architecture of mutualistic networks. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[18]  Haldre S. Rogers,et al.  Mutualistic strategies minimize coextinction in plant–disperser networks , 2017, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  Complexity and stability of ecological networks: a review of the theory , 2018, Population Ecology.

[20]  Cang Hui,et al.  Robustness of rigid and adaptive networks to species loss , 2017, PloS one.

[21]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Network structure and biodiversity loss in food webs: robustness increases with connectance , 2002, Ecology Letters.

[22]  Jane Memmott,et al.  Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  P. Landi,et al.  Modelling coevolution in ecological networks with adaptive dynamics , 2018 .

[24]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  On the meanings of nestedness: back to the basics , 2012 .

[25]  Marten Scheffer,et al.  Allowing variance may enlarge the safe operating space for exploited ecosystems , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Pedro Jordano,et al.  Interaction frequency as a surrogate for the total effect of animal mutualists on plants , 2005 .

[27]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[28]  Haldre S. Rogers,et al.  Secondary extinctions of biodiversity. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[29]  Víctor M Eguíluz,et al.  Plant survival and keystone pollinator species in stochastic coextinction models: role of intrinsic dependence on animal-pollination , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[30]  L. Carvalheiro,et al.  Pollinator networks, alien species and the conservation of rare plants: Trinia glauca as a case study , 2008 .

[31]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Asymmetric Coevolutionary Networks Facilitate Biodiversity Maintenance , 2006, Science.

[32]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Universal resilience patterns in complex networks , 2016, Nature.

[33]  Carsten F Dormann,et al.  Ecological networks are more sensitive to plant than to animal extinction under climate change , 2016, Nature Communications.

[34]  Marco A. R. Mello,et al.  Pollination networks of oil-flowers: a tiny world within the smallest of all worlds. , 2009, The Journal of animal ecology.

[35]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Non-random coextinctions in phylogenetically structured mutualistic networks , 2007, Nature.

[36]  Carsten F. Dormann,et al.  Indices, Graphs and Null Models: Analyzing Bipartite Ecological Networks , 2009 .

[37]  J. Bascompte,et al.  Invariant properties in coevolutionary networks of plant-animal interactions , 2002 .

[38]  Mário Almeida-Neto,et al.  A simple stochastic model for complex coextinctions in mutualistic networks: robustness decreases with connectance. , 2015, Ecology letters.

[39]  Judith L Bronstein,et al.  Interaction rewiring and the rapid turnover of plant-pollinator networks. , 2017, Ecology letters.

[40]  Rodrigo Ramos-Jiliberto,et al.  Topological plasticity increases robustness of mutualistic networks. , 2012, The Journal of animal ecology.