An augmented step size adjustment method for the performance measure approach: Toward general structural reliability-based design optimization

Abstract Heavy computational burden has been one of the largest barriers to the application of reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) in real-world structures. The key difficulty of RBDO lies in how to perform reliability analysis efficiently and robustly. In performance measure approach (PMA)-based RBDO, the reliability analysis process searches for the minimum performance target point (MPTP) with the target reliability index in standard normal space. Many methods have been proposed to improve the efficiency and robustness of the PMA. However, these methods may face the convergence problem for highly nonlinear constraint functions; or high computational cost for weakly nonlinear ones. More importantly, most existing methods are very sensitive to the selection of algorithm parameters. In this paper, an augmented step size adjustment (ASSA) method is proposed to boost the iterative process in terms of both efficiency and robustness. According to the relative positions of the direction vector and negative gradient direction and the angle between them at each iterative point, a fire-new strategy is established to identify the oscillation during the iterative process and define the iterative step size. Seven inverse reliability analysis problems and three RBDO benchmarks are used to validate the performance of the ASSA method. The results indicate that the ASSA method has wide applicability for nonlinear constraint functions and achieves efficient and robust performance. Furthermore, the results demonstrate that the ASSA method can be regarded as a reliable and effective method for addressing PMA-based RBDO problems.

[1]  L. Zadeh Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility , 1999 .

[2]  Wei Chen,et al.  An integrated framework for optimization under uncertainty using inverse Reliability strategy , 2004 .

[3]  Dixiong Yang,et al.  Chaos control of performance measure approach for evaluation of probabilistic constraints , 2009 .

[4]  A. M. Hasofer,et al.  Exact and Invariant Second-Moment Code Format , 1974 .

[5]  Z. Kang,et al.  On non-probabilistic reliability-based design optimization of structures with uncertain-but-bounded parameters , 2011 .

[6]  Kyung K. Choi,et al.  Selecting probabilistic approaches for reliability-based design optimization , 2004 .

[7]  Zeng Meng,et al.  A hybrid relaxed first-order reliability method for efficient structural reliability analysis , 2017 .

[8]  Peng Hao,et al.  A new reliability-based design optimization framework using isogeometric analysis , 2019, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.

[9]  Didier Lemosse,et al.  An approach for the reliability based design optimization of laminated composites , 2011 .

[10]  Gang Li,et al.  A hybrid chaos control approach of the performance measure functions for reliability-based design optimization , 2015 .

[11]  E. Nikolaidis,et al.  Reliability based optimization: A safety index approach , 1988 .

[12]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Second-Order Reliability Approximations , 1987 .

[13]  John Dalsgaard Sørensen,et al.  Reliability-Based Optimization in Structural Engineering , 1994 .

[14]  Zeng Meng,et al.  An accurate and efficient reliability-based design optimization using the second order reliability method and improved stability transformation method , 2017 .

[15]  Young-Soon Yang,et al.  A comparative study on reliability-index and target-performance-based probabilistic structural design optimization , 2002 .

[16]  Kyung K. Choi,et al.  Hybrid Analysis Method for Reliability-Based Design Optimization , 2003 .

[17]  Caitlyn E. Clark,et al.  Reliability-based design optimization in offshore renewable energy systems , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[18]  Mark G. Stewart,et al.  Reliability-based load factor design model for explosive blast loading , 2018 .

[19]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Optimization algorithms for structural reliability , 1991 .

[20]  Mark G. Stewart,et al.  Reliability-Based Design Load Factors for Explosive Blast Loading , 2015 .

[21]  G. Cheng,et al.  Convergence analysis of first order reliability method using chaos theory , 2006, Computers & Structures.

[22]  D G Elms,et al.  Structural safety–issues and progress , 2004 .

[23]  I. Elishakoff,et al.  Convex models of uncertainty in applied mechanics , 1990 .

[24]  B. Youn,et al.  Enriched Performance Measure Approach for Reliability-Based Design Optimization. , 2005 .

[25]  Wei Chen,et al.  Reliability-based design optimization of composite battery box based on modified particle swarm optimization algorithm , 2018, Composite Structures.

[26]  Hao Wu,et al.  A novel non-probabilistic reliability-based design optimization algorithm using enhanced chaos control method , 2017 .

[27]  Wei-Hsin Huang,et al.  Study of an assembly tolerance allocation model based on Monte Carlo simulation , 1997 .

[28]  I. Elishakoff,et al.  Combination of probabilistic and convex models of uncertainty when scarce knowledge is present on acoustic excitation parameters , 1993 .

[29]  Zhenzhong Chen,et al.  An adaptive decoupling approach for reliability-based design optimization , 2013 .

[30]  Robert E. Melchers,et al.  Structural Reliability: Analysis and Prediction , 1987 .

[31]  Armando Miguel Awruch,et al.  Reliability based optimization of laminated composite structures using genetic algorithms and Artificial Neural Networks , 2011 .

[32]  Ikjin Lee,et al.  A Novel Second-Order Reliability Method (SORM) Using Noncentral or Generalized Chi-Squared Distributions , 2012 .

[33]  Michel van Tooren,et al.  Sequential Optimization and Mixed Uncertainty Analysis Method for Reliability-Based Optimization , 2013 .

[34]  C. Jiang,et al.  Probability-interval hybrid uncertainty analysis for structures with both aleatory and epistemic uncertainties: a review , 2018 .

[35]  Manolis Papadrakakis,et al.  Reliability-based structural optimization using neural networks and Monte Carlo simulation , 2002 .

[36]  André T. Beck,et al.  A comparison of deterministic‚ reliability-based and risk-based structural optimization under uncertainty , 2012 .

[37]  B. Youn,et al.  Adaptive probability analysis using an enhanced hybrid mean value method , 2005 .

[38]  Terje Haukaas,et al.  Feasibility of FORM in finite element reliability analysis , 2010 .

[39]  Ikjin Lee,et al.  Probabilistic sensitivity analysis for novel second-order reliability method (SORM) using generalized chi-squared distribution , 2014 .

[40]  Dixiong Yang,et al.  Stability Analysis and Convergence Control of Iterative Algorithms for Reliability Analysis and Design Optimization , 2013 .

[41]  T. Cruse,et al.  Advanced probabilistic structural analysis method for implicit performance functions , 1990 .

[42]  Lei Wang,et al.  Reliability-based design optimization under mixture of random, interval and convex uncertainties , 2016 .

[43]  Roger Fletcher,et al.  A Rapidly Convergent Descent Method for Minimization , 1963, Comput. J..

[44]  Peng Hao,et al.  An efficient adaptive-loop method for non-probabilistic reliability-based design optimization , 2017 .

[45]  Hao Hu,et al.  An adaptive hybrid approach for reliability-based design optimization , 2015 .

[46]  Zissimos P. Mourelatos,et al.  A single-loop method for reliability-based design optimisation , 2008 .

[47]  Kyung K. Choi,et al.  A NEW STUDY ON RELIABILITY-BASED DESIGN OPTIMIZATION , 1999 .

[48]  Zeng Meng,et al.  A self-adaptive modified chaos control method for reliability-based design optimization , 2017 .