No Evidence that the Majority of Black Holes in Binaries Have Zero Spin

The spin properties of merging black holes observed with gravitational waves can offer novel information about the origin of these systems. The magnitudes and orientations of black hole spins offer a record of binaries’ evolutionary history, encoding information about massive stellar evolution and the astrophysical environments in which binary black holes are assembled. Recent analyses of the binary black hole population have yielded conflicting portraits of the black hole spin distribution. Some works suggest that black hole spins are small but nonzero and exhibit a wide range of misalignment angles relative to binaries’ orbital angular momenta. Other works conclude that the majority of black holes are nonspinning while the remainder are rapidly rotating and primarily aligned with their orbits. We revisit these conflicting conclusions, employing a variety of complementary methods to measure the distribution of spin magnitudes and orientations among binary black hole mergers. We find that the existence of a subpopulation of black holes with vanishing spins is not required by current data. Should such a subpopulation exist, we conclude that it must contain ≲60% of binaries. Additionally, we find evidence for significant spin–orbit misalignment among the binary black hole population, with some systems exhibiting misalignment angles greater than 90°, and see no evidence for an approximately spin-aligned subpopulation.

[1]  Y. Shao,et al.  Stable Mass Transfer Can Explain Massive Binary Black Hole Mergers with a High-spin Component , 2022, The Astrophysical Journal.

[2]  M. Zevin,et al.  Suspicious Siblings: The Distribution of Mass and Spin across Component Black Holes in Isolated Binary Evolution , 2022, 2203.02515.

[3]  S. Stevenson.  Biases in Estimates of Black Hole Kicks from the Spin Distribution of Binary Black Holes , 2022, The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

[4]  S. Fairhurst,et al.  Understanding How Fast Black Holes Spin by Analyzing Data from the Second Gravitational-wave Catalogue , 2021, The Astrophysical Journal.

[5]  D. Keitel,et al.  A Detailed Analysis of GW190521 with Phenomenological Waveform Models , 2021, The Astrophysical Journal.

[6]  I. Mandel,et al.  Merging stellar-mass binary black holes , 2018, Physics Reports.

[7]  A. Olejak,et al.  The Implications of High Black Hole Spins for the Origin of Binary Black Hole Mergers , 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

[8]  I. Mandel,et al.  Building Better Spin Models for Merging Binary Black Holes: Evidence for Nonspinning and Rapidly Spinning Nearly Aligned Subpopulations , 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

[9]  T. Callister,et al.  Who Ordered That? Unequal-mass Binary Black Hole Mergers Have Larger Effective Spins , 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

[10]  M. Fishbach,et al.  Hierarchical mergers of stellar-mass black holes and their gravitational-wave signatures , 2021, Nature Astronomy.

[11]  T. Callister,et al.  State of the Field: Binary Black Hole Natal Kicks and Prospects for Isolated Field Formation after GWTC-2 , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.

[12]  H. Middleton,et al.  Evidence for Hierarchical Black Hole Mergers in the Second LIGO–Virgo Gravitational Wave Catalog , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

[13]  M. J. Williams,et al.  Population Properties of Compact Objects from the Second LIGO–Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog , 2020, 2010.14533.

[14]  P. K. Panda,et al.  Open data from the first and second observing runs of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo , 2019, 1912.11716.

[15]  C. Berry,et al.  The impact of mass-transfer physics on the observable properties of field binary black hole populations , 2020, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[16]  P. K. Panda,et al.  GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 M$_\odot$ Black Hole with a 2.6 M$_\odot$ Compact Object , 2020, 2006.12611.

[17]  Jaime Fern'andez del R'io,et al.  Array programming with NumPy , 2020, Nature.

[18]  E. Thrane,et al.  Black Hole Genealogy: Identifying Hierarchical Mergers with Gravitational Waves , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.

[19]  T. Callister,et al.  The Low Effective Spin of Binary Black Holes and Implications for Individual Gravitational-wave Events , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.

[20]  Zoheyr Doctor,et al.  Black Hole Coagulation: Modeling Hierarchical Mergers in Black Hole Populations , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[21]  B. Kocsis,et al.  Effective spin distribution of black hole mergers in triples , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[22]  Joel Nothman,et al.  SciPy 1.0-Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python , 2019, ArXiv.

[23]  D. Wysocki,et al.  Monte Carlo simulations of black hole mergers in AGN discs: Low χeff mergers and predictions for LIGO , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[24]  I. Mandel,et al.  The origin of spin in binary black holes , 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[25]  J. Speagle.  dynesty: a dynamic nested sampling package for estimating Bayesian posteriors and evidences , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[26]  Linhao Ma,et al.  Most Black Holes Are Born Very Slowly Rotating , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[27]  M. S. Shahriar,et al.  Binary Black Hole Population Properties Inferred from the First and Second Observing Runs of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.

[28]  J. Gair,et al.  Extracting distribution parameters from multiple uncertain observations with selection biases , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[29]  M. Zaldarriaga,et al.  Constraints on binary black hole populations from LIGO–Virgo detections , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[30]  S. Fairhurst,et al.  Constraining Black Hole Spins with Gravitational-wave Observations , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.

[31]  M. Fishbach,et al.  Does the Black Hole Merger Rate Evolve with Redshift? , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.

[32]  B. Liu,et al.  Black Hole and Neutron Star Binary Mergers in Triple Systems: Merger Fraction and Spin–Orbit Misalignment , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.

[33]  G. Meynet,et al.  The spin of the second-born black hole in coalescing binary black holes , 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[34]  Eric Thrane,et al.  Measuring the Binary Black Hole Mass Spectrum with an Astrophysically Motivated Parameterization , 2018, 1801.02699.

[35]  Miguel de Val-Borro,et al.  The Astropy Project: Building an Open-science Project and Status of the v2.0 Core Package , 2018, The Astronomical Journal.

[36]  D. Holz,et al.  Using Spin to Understand the Formation of LIGO and Virgo’s Black Holes , 2017, 1709.07896.

[37]  Ilya Mandel,et al.  University of Birmingham Distinguishing Spin-Aligned and Isotropic Black Hole Populations With Gravitational Waves , 2017 .

[38]  J. Kollmeier,et al.  Research Note: The Expected Spins of Gravitational Wave Sources With Isolated Field Binary Progenitors , 2017, 1702.00885.

[39]  Philip Graff,et al.  Use of gravitational waves to probe the formation channels of compact binaries , 2015, 1503.04307.

[40]  M. S. Shahriar,et al.  Characterization of the LIGO detectors during their sixth science run , 2014, 1410.7764.

[41]  Roy Williams,et al.  The LIGO Open Science Center , 2014, 1410.4839.

[42]  C. Broeck,et al.  Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector , 2014, 1408.3978.

[43]  Prasanth H. Nair,et al.  Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy , 2013, 1307.6212.

[44]  Daniel Foreman-Mackey,et al.  emcee: The MCMC Hammer , 2012, 1202.3665.

[45]  M. V. van der Sluys,et al.  Black Hole Spin Evolution: Implications for Short-Hard Gamma-Ray Bursts and Gravitational Wave Detection , 2007, astro-ph/0703131.

[46]  L. Wasserman,et al.  Computing Bayes Factors Using a Generalization of the Savage-Dickey Density Ratio , 1995 .