Spawning habitat rehabilitation ‐I. Conceptual approach and methods
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] D. Geist. Hyporheic discharge of river water into fall chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) spawning areas in the Hanford Reach, Columbia River , 2000 .
[2] S. Abt,et al. Sampling surface and subsurface particle-size distributions in wadable gravel- and cobble-bed streams for analyses in sediment transport, hydraulics, and streambed monitoring , 2001 .
[3] K. Richards,et al. The application of computational fluid dynamics to natural river channels: three-dimensional versus two-dimensional approaches , 1999 .
[4] H. Preisler,et al. Is it possible to predict habitat use by spawning salmonids? A test using California golden trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss aguabonita) , 1999 .
[5] J. R. French,et al. Hydrodynamic modelling as a basis for explaining estuarine environmental dynamics: some computational and methodological issues , 2000 .
[6] D. Sear,et al. The geomorphological basis for classifying rivers , 1998 .
[7] M. Leclerc,et al. Two‐Dimensional Hydrodynamic Modeling: A Neglected Tool in the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology , 1995 .
[8] D. W. Chapman,et al. Critical Review of Variables Used to Define Effects of Fines in Redds of Large Salmonids , 1988 .
[9] Stuart N. Lane,et al. Three-dimensional measurement of river channel flow processes using acoustic doppler velocimetry , 1998 .
[10] M. McCullagh. Creation of Smooth Contours over Irregularly Distributed Data Using Local Surface Patches , 1981 .
[11] M. Church,et al. Sediment transport along lower Fraser River: 2. Estimates based on the long‐term gravel budget , 1999 .
[12] G. Kondolf,et al. Salmon Spawning Habitat Rehabilitation on the Merced River, California: An Evaluation of Project Planning and Performance , 1996 .
[13] L. B. Leopold,et al. The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications , 1953 .
[14] Gregory B. Pasternack,et al. Application of a 2D hydrodynamic model to design of reach‐scale spawning gravel replenishment on the Mokelumne River, California , 2004 .
[15] M. Wolman,et al. Magnitude and Frequency of Forces in Geomorphic Processes , 1960, The Journal of Geology.
[16] P. Wilcock. Friction between science and practice: The case of river restoration , 1997 .
[17] M. Church,et al. An assessment of bed load sediment transport formulae for gravel bed rivers , 1989 .
[18] D. Montgomery. Hydrogeomorphic Variability and River Restoration , 2003 .
[19] F. D. Shields,et al. Design for Stream Restoration , 2003 .
[20] M. Clark,et al. Dealing with uncertainty: adaptive approaches to sustainable river management , 2002 .
[21] W. Covington,et al. Restoration ecology [1] , 2000 .
[22] J. Brasington,et al. Methodological sensitivity of morphometric estimates of coarse fluvial sediment transport , 2003 .
[23] D. Sear,et al. Modelling three‐dimensional flow structures and patterns of boundary shear stress in a natural pool–riffle sequence , 2001 .
[24] D. M. Thompson,et al. Velocity reversals and sediment sorting in pools and riffles controlled by channel constrictions , 1999 .
[25] Charles C. Coutant,et al. A GENERAL PROTOCOL FOR RESTORATION OF REGULATED RIVERS , 1996 .
[26] Bas Pedroli,et al. Setting targets in strategies for river restoration , 2002, Landscape Ecology.
[27] M. Clark,et al. Supporting complex decisions for sustainable river management in England and Wales , 2002 .
[28] L. B. Leopold,et al. River flood plains: Some observations on their formation , 1957 .
[29] D. Lonzarich. Strategies for Restoring River Ecosystems: Sources of Variability and Uncertainty in Natural and Managed Systems , 2004 .
[30] R. Lacey. Application of a 2-dimensional hydrodynamic model for the assessment and design of instream channel restoration works , 2001 .
[31] C. Andrew Dolloff,et al. Design Considerations for Large Woody Debris Placement in Stream Enhancement Projects , 1998 .
[32] Paul M. Randall,et al. Evaluating the Biotic Integrity of Watersheds in the Sierra Nevada, California , 1998 .
[33] Nicholas J. Clifford,et al. Classics in physical geography revisited , 1996 .
[34] M. Leclerc,et al. Modélisation de la dynamique de l'habitat des jeunes stades de saumon atlantique (Salmo salar) de la rivière Ashuapmushuan (Québec, Canada) , 1994 .
[35] G. Mathias Kondolf,et al. Five Elements for Effective Evaluation of Stream Restoration , 1995 .
[36] J. Brasington,et al. Monitoring and modelling morphological change in a braided gravel‐bed river using high resolution GPS‐based survey , 2000 .
[37] David Gilvear,et al. Fluvial geomorphology and river engineering: future roles utilizing a fluvial hydrosystems framework , 1999 .
[38] F. Douglas Shields,et al. River Channel Restoration: Guiding Principles for Sustainable Projects. , 1997 .
[39] J. Kershner,et al. Establishing aquatic restoration priorities using a watershed approach. , 2002, Journal of environmental management.
[40] H. Fischer. Mixing in Inland and Coastal Waters , 1979 .
[41] A. S. Paintal,et al. Concept Of Critical Shear Stress In Loose Boundary Open Channels , 1971 .
[42] Klement Tockner,et al. Understanding natural patterns and processes in river corridors as the basis for effective river restoration , 2001 .
[43] Joseph M. Wheaton. Spawning Habitat Rehabilitation , 2003 .
[44] K. Fryirs,et al. River Styles, a Geomorphic Approach to Catchment Characterization: Implications for River Rehabilitation in Bega Catchment, New South Wales, Australia , 2000, Environmental management.
[45] William L. Graf,et al. Damage Control: Restoring the Physical Integrity of America’s Rivers , 2001 .
[46] M. Newson. Geomorphological concepts and tools for sustainable river ecosystem management , 2002 .
[47] Paul D. Bates,et al. The importance of spatial resolution in hydraulic models for floodplain environments , 1999 .
[48] G. Kondolf. PROFILE: Hungry Water: Effects of Dams and Gravel Mining on River Channels , 1997, Environmental management.
[49] D. M. Thompson,et al. Equilibrium pool dimensions and sediment-sorting patterns in coarse-grained, New England channels , 2001 .
[50] G Marmulla,et al. Dams, fish and fisheries: Opportunities, challenges and conflict resolution , 2001 .
[51] C. Walters. Challenges in adaptive management of riparian and coastal ecosystems , 1997 .
[52] Karl C. Halupka,et al. Anadromous fish as keystone species in vertebrate communities , 1995 .
[53] G. Pasternack,et al. APPLICATION OF A 2 D HYDRODYNAMIC MODEL TO DESIGN OF REACH-SCALE SPAWNING GRAVEL REPLENISHMENT ON THE MOKELUMNE RIVER , 2004 .
[54] G. Mathias Kondolf,et al. Some Suggested Guidelines for Geomorphic Aspects of Anadromous Salmonid Habitat Restoration Proposals , 2000 .
[55] Robert C. Petersen,et al. Developments in Stream Ecosystem Theory , 1985 .
[56] G. Pess,et al. A Review of Stream Restoration Techniques and a Hierarchical Strategy for Prioritizing Restoration in Pacific Northwest Watersheds , 2002 .
[57] Paul D. Bates,et al. The TELEMAC modelling system - Special issue , 2000 .
[58] Rhj Sellin,et al. INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL VALIDATION OF A TWO-DIMENSIONAL FINITE ELEMENT CODE FOR RIVER FLOOD SIMULATIONS. , 1998 .
[59] G. Mathias Kondolf,et al. Geomorphological stream channel classification in aquatic habitat restoration: Uses and limitations , 1995 .
[60] Malcolm Newson,et al. Sediment‐related river maintenance: The role of fluvial geomorphology , 1995 .
[61] R. Hilborn,et al. Chapter 9. Watershed Restoration— Adaptive Decision Making in the Face of Uncertainty , 2003 .
[62] F. Holly,et al. APPLICATION OF 3D MOBILE BED, HYDRODYNAMIC MODEL , 1999 .
[63] Colin R. Thorne,et al. Stream Reconnaissance Handbook: Geomorphological Investigation and Analysis of River Channels , 1998 .
[64] PETER W. DOWNS,et al. Post-Project Appraisals in Adaptive Management of River Channel Restoration , 2002, Environmental management.
[65] R. Beschta,et al. Restoration and management of riparian ecosystems: a catchment perspective , 1998 .
[66] Colin R. Thorne,et al. Channel Restoration Design for Meandering Rivers , 2001 .
[67] P. J. Whiting. STREAMFLOW NECESSARY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MAINTENANCE , 2002 .
[68] C. B. Singh,et al. Application of 3D Mobile Bed, Hydrodynamic Model , 2000 .
[69] M. Leeder,et al. Flow separation in meander bends , 1975, Nature.
[70] E. Keller. Areal Sorting of Bed-Load Material: The Hypothesis of Velocity Reversal , 1971 .
[71] Kenneth R. Olson,et al. Rapid Evaluation of Sediment Budgets , 1997 .
[72] P. DeVries. Bedload layer thickness and disturbance depth in gravel bed streams , 2002 .
[73] I. Cowx,et al. An evaluation of instream habitat restoration techniques on salmonid populations in a Newfoundland stream , 1997 .
[74] J. Merz,et al. Evaluation of a Spawning Habitat Enhancement Site for Chinook Salmon in a Regulated California River , 2004 .
[75] A. Bednarek. Undamming Rivers: A Review of the Ecological Impacts of Dam Removal , 2001, Environmental management.
[76] P. Boon. River restoration in five dimensions , 1998 .
[77] J. Lichatowich,et al. Pacific Salmon at the Crossroads: Stocks at Risk from California, Oregon, Idaho, and Washington , 1991 .
[78] T. C. Chamberlin. The Method of Multiple Working Hypotheses , 1931, The Journal of Geology.
[79] P. Wilcock. Estimating Local Bed Shear Stress from Velocity Observations , 1996 .
[80] Williams,et al. Watershed Assessment Techniques and the Success of Aquatic Restoration Activities , 2003 .
[81] Panayiotis Diplas,et al. Using two-dimensional hydrodynamic models at scales of ecological importance , 2000 .
[82] E. Herricks,et al. A Multiscale Conceptual Framework for Integrated Ecogeomorphological Research to Support Stream Naturalization in the Agricultural Midwest , 2002, Environmental management.
[83] G. Kondolf,et al. Assessing Salmonid Spawning Gravel Quality , 2000 .
[84] R. Hey,et al. Impact of flood alleviation schemes on aquatic macrophytes , 1994 .
[85] J. French,et al. Airborne LiDAR in support of geomorphological and hydraulic modelling , 2003 .
[86] T. Quinn,et al. Factors affecting the duration of nest defense and reproductive lifespan of female sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka , 1998, Environmental Biology of Fishes.
[87] Gordon E. Grant,et al. WATERSHED ANALYSIS AS A FRAMEWORK FOR IMPLEMENTING ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT , 1995 .
[88] Peter B. Moyle,et al. Historical Abundance and Decline of Chinook Salmon in the Central Valley Region of California , 1998 .
[89] D. Sear. River restoration and geomorphology , 1994 .
[90] Ronald W. Tuttle,et al. Stream Corridor Restoration: Principles, Processes, and Practices , 1998 .
[91] D. Sear. SEDIMENT TRANSPORT PROCESSES IN POOL–RIFFLE SEQUENCES , 1996 .
[92] Stanley A. Schumm,et al. To interpret the earth : ten ways to be wrong , 1992 .
[93] Joseph M. Wheaton,et al. Spawning habitat rehabilitation ‐ II. Using hypothesis development and testing in design, Mokelumne river, California, U.S.A. , 2004 .
[94] M. Naura,et al. The development of physical quality objectives for rivers in England and Wales , 2002 .
[95] Neil Swindale. Numerical modelling of river rehabilitation schemes , 1999 .
[96] Simon S. C. Harrison,et al. Rehabilitation of Rivers — Principles and Implementation , 2000 .
[97] Nicole Goutal,et al. TELEMAC: A new numerical model for solving shallow water equations , 1991 .
[98] David P. Braun,et al. A Method for Assessing Hydrologic Alteration within Ecosystems , 1996 .
[99] D C Froehlich,et al. FINITE ELEMENT SURFACE-WATER MODELING SYSTEM: TWO-DIMENSIONAL FLOW IN A HORIZONTAL PLANE. USERS MANUAL , 1989 .
[100] E. Stanley,et al. Toward Policies and Decision-Making for Dam Removal , 2003, Environmental management.
[101] Jack A. Taylor,et al. Evaluation of the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Field Users , 1991 .
[102] D. Knighton. Fluvial Forms and Processes: A New Perspective , 1998 .
[103] Peter R. Wilcock,et al. Toward a practical method for estimating sediment‐transport rates in gravel‐bed rivers , 2001 .
[104] M. Church. Geomorphic thresholds in riverine landscapes , 2002 .
[105] D. Harper,et al. Artificial riffles in river rehabilitation: setting the goals and measuring the successes , 1998 .
[106] G. Mathias Kondolf,et al. The sizes of salmonid spawning gravels , 1993 .
[107] K. G. Ranga Raju,et al. Mechanics of Sediment Transportation and Alluvial Stream Problems , 1978 .
[108] Mikael Hildén,et al. The Role of Integrating Concepts in Watershed Rehabilitation , 2000 .
[109] P. Maitland. Restoration of aquatic ecosystems: Science, technology, and public policy , 1993 .
[110] P. Nienhuis,et al. A systems approach to river restoration: a case study in the lower Seine valley, France , 2002 .
[111] Thomas E. Lisle,et al. Effects of Sediment Transport on Survival of Salmonid Embryos in a Natural Stream: A Simulation Approach , 1992 .
[112] Mark Patrick Taylor,et al. A geomorphological framework for river characterization and habitat assessment , 2001 .
[113] Ian Maddock,et al. The Importance of Physical Habitat Assessment for Evaluating River Health , 1999 .
[114] John Pitlick,et al. Observations of Flow and Sediment Entrainment on a Large Gravel-Bed River , 1996 .
[115] W. Dietrich,et al. Downstream Ecological Effects of Dams: A geomorphic perspective , 1995 .
[116] S. Fennessy,et al. Review of: Restoration of aquatic ecosystems: Science, technology, and public policy: Committee on Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems-Science, Technology, and Public Policy, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC , 1993 .
[117] J. Hervouet. TELEMAC modelling system: an overview , 2000 .
[118] Daniel R. Parsons,et al. Assessing the credibility of a series of computational fluid dynamic simulations of open channel flow , 2003 .
[119] D. Montgomery,et al. Channel type and salmonid spawning distribution and abundance , 1999 .
[120] S. N. Lane,et al. Application of Digital Photogrammetry to Complex Topography for Geomorphological Research , 2000 .
[121] T. C. Chamberlin. The Method of Multiple Working Hypotheses: With this method the dangers of parental affection for a favorite theory can be circumvented. , 1965, Science.