Spawning habitat rehabilitation ‐I. Conceptual approach and methods

Abstract Altered sediment and flow regimes in regulated rivers limit available spawning habitat for many fishes, especially salmonids. Mitigation efforts include spawning habitat rehabilitation and dam‐removal, but often neglect conceptual or predictive models of hydrogeomorphic and ecological processes. Complete restoration of processes necessary for maintaining spawning habitat is often unrealistic in regulated rivers. However, we present a framework for spawning habitat rehabilitation based on the premise that certain ecologic functions and geomorphic processes can be restored in a manner that facilitates testing of underlying scientific theories. SHIRA (Spawning Habitat Integrated Rehabilitation Approach) provides a science‐based, systematic framework for reach‐scale rehabilitation of salmonid spawning habitat in regulated rivers. This approach is driven by a mix of field data, conceptual models and numerical models to provide predictive and explanatory insight into the rehabilitation process. Conceptual models are advocated for developing multiple design scenarios and explicit hypotheses about hydrogeomorphic processes and ecologic functions provided by said designs. Hydrodynamic, habitat suitability and sediment entrainment models that test the potential validity of design hypotheses prior to construction are reviewed. It is presumed that the added insight would improve the outcome of rehabilitation projects and test underlying scientific theories against the rigors of real‐world uncertainties.

[1]  D. Geist Hyporheic discharge of river water into fall chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) spawning areas in the Hanford Reach, Columbia River , 2000 .

[2]  S. Abt,et al.  Sampling surface and subsurface particle-size distributions in wadable gravel- and cobble-bed streams for analyses in sediment transport, hydraulics, and streambed monitoring , 2001 .

[3]  K. Richards,et al.  The application of computational fluid dynamics to natural river channels: three-dimensional versus two-dimensional approaches , 1999 .

[4]  H. Preisler,et al.  Is it possible to predict habitat use by spawning salmonids? A test using California golden trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss aguabonita) , 1999 .

[5]  J. R. French,et al.  Hydrodynamic modelling as a basis for explaining estuarine environmental dynamics: some computational and methodological issues , 2000 .

[6]  D. Sear,et al.  The geomorphological basis for classifying rivers , 1998 .

[7]  M. Leclerc,et al.  Two‐Dimensional Hydrodynamic Modeling: A Neglected Tool in the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology , 1995 .

[8]  D. W. Chapman,et al.  Critical Review of Variables Used to Define Effects of Fines in Redds of Large Salmonids , 1988 .

[9]  Stuart N. Lane,et al.  Three-dimensional measurement of river channel flow processes using acoustic doppler velocimetry , 1998 .

[10]  M. McCullagh Creation of Smooth Contours over Irregularly Distributed Data Using Local Surface Patches , 1981 .

[11]  M. Church,et al.  Sediment transport along lower Fraser River: 2. Estimates based on the long‐term gravel budget , 1999 .

[12]  G. Kondolf,et al.  Salmon Spawning Habitat Rehabilitation on the Merced River, California: An Evaluation of Project Planning and Performance , 1996 .

[13]  L. B. Leopold,et al.  The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications , 1953 .

[14]  Gregory B. Pasternack,et al.  Application of a 2D hydrodynamic model to design of reach‐scale spawning gravel replenishment on the Mokelumne River, California , 2004 .

[15]  M. Wolman,et al.  Magnitude and Frequency of Forces in Geomorphic Processes , 1960, The Journal of Geology.

[16]  P. Wilcock Friction between science and practice: The case of river restoration , 1997 .

[17]  M. Church,et al.  An assessment of bed load sediment transport formulae for gravel bed rivers , 1989 .

[18]  D. Montgomery Hydrogeomorphic Variability and River Restoration , 2003 .

[19]  F. D. Shields,et al.  Design for Stream Restoration , 2003 .

[20]  M. Clark,et al.  Dealing with uncertainty: adaptive approaches to sustainable river management , 2002 .

[21]  W. Covington,et al.  Restoration ecology [1] , 2000 .

[22]  J. Brasington,et al.  Methodological sensitivity of morphometric estimates of coarse fluvial sediment transport , 2003 .

[23]  D. Sear,et al.  Modelling three‐dimensional flow structures and patterns of boundary shear stress in a natural pool–riffle sequence , 2001 .

[24]  D. M. Thompson,et al.  Velocity reversals and sediment sorting in pools and riffles controlled by channel constrictions , 1999 .

[25]  Charles C. Coutant,et al.  A GENERAL PROTOCOL FOR RESTORATION OF REGULATED RIVERS , 1996 .

[26]  Bas Pedroli,et al.  Setting targets in strategies for river restoration , 2002, Landscape Ecology.

[27]  M. Clark,et al.  Supporting complex decisions for sustainable river management in England and Wales , 2002 .

[28]  L. B. Leopold,et al.  River flood plains: Some observations on their formation , 1957 .

[29]  D. Lonzarich Strategies for Restoring River Ecosystems: Sources of Variability and Uncertainty in Natural and Managed Systems , 2004 .

[30]  R. Lacey Application of a 2-dimensional hydrodynamic model for the assessment and design of instream channel restoration works , 2001 .

[31]  C. Andrew Dolloff,et al.  Design Considerations for Large Woody Debris Placement in Stream Enhancement Projects , 1998 .

[32]  Paul M. Randall,et al.  Evaluating the Biotic Integrity of Watersheds in the Sierra Nevada, California , 1998 .

[33]  Nicholas J. Clifford,et al.  Classics in physical geography revisited , 1996 .

[34]  M. Leclerc,et al.  Modélisation de la dynamique de l'habitat des jeunes stades de saumon atlantique (Salmo salar) de la rivière Ashuapmushuan (Québec, Canada) , 1994 .

[35]  G. Mathias Kondolf,et al.  Five Elements for Effective Evaluation of Stream Restoration , 1995 .

[36]  J. Brasington,et al.  Monitoring and modelling morphological change in a braided gravel‐bed river using high resolution GPS‐based survey , 2000 .

[37]  David Gilvear,et al.  Fluvial geomorphology and river engineering: future roles utilizing a fluvial hydrosystems framework , 1999 .

[38]  F. Douglas Shields,et al.  River Channel Restoration: Guiding Principles for Sustainable Projects. , 1997 .

[39]  J. Kershner,et al.  Establishing aquatic restoration priorities using a watershed approach. , 2002, Journal of environmental management.

[40]  H. Fischer Mixing in Inland and Coastal Waters , 1979 .

[41]  A. S. Paintal,et al.  Concept Of Critical Shear Stress In Loose Boundary Open Channels , 1971 .

[42]  Klement Tockner,et al.  Understanding natural patterns and processes in river corridors as the basis for effective river restoration , 2001 .

[43]  Joseph M. Wheaton Spawning Habitat Rehabilitation , 2003 .

[44]  K. Fryirs,et al.  River Styles, a Geomorphic Approach to Catchment Characterization: Implications for River Rehabilitation in Bega Catchment, New South Wales, Australia , 2000, Environmental management.

[45]  William L. Graf,et al.  Damage Control: Restoring the Physical Integrity of America’s Rivers , 2001 .

[46]  M. Newson Geomorphological concepts and tools for sustainable river ecosystem management , 2002 .

[47]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  The importance of spatial resolution in hydraulic models for floodplain environments , 1999 .

[48]  G. Kondolf PROFILE: Hungry Water: Effects of Dams and Gravel Mining on River Channels , 1997, Environmental management.

[49]  D. M. Thompson,et al.  Equilibrium pool dimensions and sediment-sorting patterns in coarse-grained, New England channels , 2001 .

[50]  G Marmulla,et al.  Dams, fish and fisheries: Opportunities, challenges and conflict resolution , 2001 .

[51]  C. Walters Challenges in adaptive management of riparian and coastal ecosystems , 1997 .

[52]  Karl C. Halupka,et al.  Anadromous fish as keystone species in vertebrate communities , 1995 .

[53]  G. Pasternack,et al.  APPLICATION OF A 2 D HYDRODYNAMIC MODEL TO DESIGN OF REACH-SCALE SPAWNING GRAVEL REPLENISHMENT ON THE MOKELUMNE RIVER , 2004 .

[54]  G. Mathias Kondolf,et al.  Some Suggested Guidelines for Geomorphic Aspects of Anadromous Salmonid Habitat Restoration Proposals , 2000 .

[55]  Robert C. Petersen,et al.  Developments in Stream Ecosystem Theory , 1985 .

[56]  G. Pess,et al.  A Review of Stream Restoration Techniques and a Hierarchical Strategy for Prioritizing Restoration in Pacific Northwest Watersheds , 2002 .

[57]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  The TELEMAC modelling system - Special issue , 2000 .

[58]  Rhj Sellin,et al.  INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL VALIDATION OF A TWO-DIMENSIONAL FINITE ELEMENT CODE FOR RIVER FLOOD SIMULATIONS. , 1998 .

[59]  G. Mathias Kondolf,et al.  Geomorphological stream channel classification in aquatic habitat restoration: Uses and limitations , 1995 .

[60]  Malcolm Newson,et al.  Sediment‐related river maintenance: The role of fluvial geomorphology , 1995 .

[61]  R. Hilborn,et al.  Chapter 9. Watershed Restoration— Adaptive Decision Making in the Face of Uncertainty , 2003 .

[62]  F. Holly,et al.  APPLICATION OF 3D MOBILE BED, HYDRODYNAMIC MODEL , 1999 .

[63]  Colin R. Thorne,et al.  Stream Reconnaissance Handbook: Geomorphological Investigation and Analysis of River Channels , 1998 .

[64]  PETER W. DOWNS,et al.  Post-Project Appraisals in Adaptive Management of River Channel Restoration , 2002, Environmental management.

[65]  R. Beschta,et al.  Restoration and management of riparian ecosystems: a catchment perspective , 1998 .

[66]  Colin R. Thorne,et al.  Channel Restoration Design for Meandering Rivers , 2001 .

[67]  P. J. Whiting STREAMFLOW NECESSARY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MAINTENANCE , 2002 .

[68]  C. B. Singh,et al.  Application of 3D Mobile Bed, Hydrodynamic Model , 2000 .

[69]  M. Leeder,et al.  Flow separation in meander bends , 1975, Nature.

[70]  E. Keller Areal Sorting of Bed-Load Material: The Hypothesis of Velocity Reversal , 1971 .

[71]  Kenneth R. Olson,et al.  Rapid Evaluation of Sediment Budgets , 1997 .

[72]  P. DeVries Bedload layer thickness and disturbance depth in gravel bed streams , 2002 .

[73]  I. Cowx,et al.  An evaluation of instream habitat restoration techniques on salmonid populations in a Newfoundland stream , 1997 .

[74]  J. Merz,et al.  Evaluation of a Spawning Habitat Enhancement Site for Chinook Salmon in a Regulated California River , 2004 .

[75]  A. Bednarek Undamming Rivers: A Review of the Ecological Impacts of Dam Removal , 2001, Environmental management.

[76]  P. Boon River restoration in five dimensions , 1998 .

[77]  J. Lichatowich,et al.  Pacific Salmon at the Crossroads: Stocks at Risk from California, Oregon, Idaho, and Washington , 1991 .

[78]  T. C. Chamberlin The Method of Multiple Working Hypotheses , 1931, The Journal of Geology.

[79]  P. Wilcock Estimating Local Bed Shear Stress from Velocity Observations , 1996 .

[80]  Williams,et al.  Watershed Assessment Techniques and the Success of Aquatic Restoration Activities , 2003 .

[81]  Panayiotis Diplas,et al.  Using two-dimensional hydrodynamic models at scales of ecological importance , 2000 .

[82]  E. Herricks,et al.  A Multiscale Conceptual Framework for Integrated Ecogeomorphological Research to Support Stream Naturalization in the Agricultural Midwest , 2002, Environmental management.

[83]  G. Kondolf,et al.  Assessing Salmonid Spawning Gravel Quality , 2000 .

[84]  R. Hey,et al.  Impact of flood alleviation schemes on aquatic macrophytes , 1994 .

[85]  J. French,et al.  Airborne LiDAR in support of geomorphological and hydraulic modelling , 2003 .

[86]  T. Quinn,et al.  Factors affecting the duration of nest defense and reproductive lifespan of female sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka , 1998, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[87]  Gordon E. Grant,et al.  WATERSHED ANALYSIS AS A FRAMEWORK FOR IMPLEMENTING ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT , 1995 .

[88]  Peter B. Moyle,et al.  Historical Abundance and Decline of Chinook Salmon in the Central Valley Region of California , 1998 .

[89]  D. Sear River restoration and geomorphology , 1994 .

[90]  Ronald W. Tuttle,et al.  Stream Corridor Restoration: Principles, Processes, and Practices , 1998 .

[91]  D. Sear SEDIMENT TRANSPORT PROCESSES IN POOL–RIFFLE SEQUENCES , 1996 .

[92]  Stanley A. Schumm,et al.  To interpret the earth : ten ways to be wrong , 1992 .

[93]  Joseph M. Wheaton,et al.  Spawning habitat rehabilitation ‐ II. Using hypothesis development and testing in design, Mokelumne river, California, U.S.A. , 2004 .

[94]  M. Naura,et al.  The development of physical quality objectives for rivers in England and Wales , 2002 .

[95]  Neil Swindale Numerical modelling of river rehabilitation schemes , 1999 .

[96]  Simon S. C. Harrison,et al.  Rehabilitation of Rivers — Principles and Implementation , 2000 .

[97]  Nicole Goutal,et al.  TELEMAC: A new numerical model for solving shallow water equations , 1991 .

[98]  David P. Braun,et al.  A Method for Assessing Hydrologic Alteration within Ecosystems , 1996 .

[99]  D C Froehlich,et al.  FINITE ELEMENT SURFACE-WATER MODELING SYSTEM: TWO-DIMENSIONAL FLOW IN A HORIZONTAL PLANE. USERS MANUAL , 1989 .

[100]  E. Stanley,et al.  Toward Policies and Decision-Making for Dam Removal , 2003, Environmental management.

[101]  Jack A. Taylor,et al.  Evaluation of the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Field Users , 1991 .

[102]  D. Knighton Fluvial Forms and Processes: A New Perspective , 1998 .

[103]  Peter R. Wilcock,et al.  Toward a practical method for estimating sediment‐transport rates in gravel‐bed rivers , 2001 .

[104]  M. Church Geomorphic thresholds in riverine landscapes , 2002 .

[105]  D. Harper,et al.  Artificial riffles in river rehabilitation: setting the goals and measuring the successes , 1998 .

[106]  G. Mathias Kondolf,et al.  The sizes of salmonid spawning gravels , 1993 .

[107]  K. G. Ranga Raju,et al.  Mechanics of Sediment Transportation and Alluvial Stream Problems , 1978 .

[108]  Mikael Hildén,et al.  The Role of Integrating Concepts in Watershed Rehabilitation , 2000 .

[109]  P. Maitland Restoration of aquatic ecosystems: Science, technology, and public policy , 1993 .

[110]  P. Nienhuis,et al.  A systems approach to river restoration: a case study in the lower Seine valley, France , 2002 .

[111]  Thomas E. Lisle,et al.  Effects of Sediment Transport on Survival of Salmonid Embryos in a Natural Stream: A Simulation Approach , 1992 .

[112]  Mark Patrick Taylor,et al.  A geomorphological framework for river characterization and habitat assessment , 2001 .

[113]  Ian Maddock,et al.  The Importance of Physical Habitat Assessment for Evaluating River Health , 1999 .

[114]  John Pitlick,et al.  Observations of Flow and Sediment Entrainment on a Large Gravel-Bed River , 1996 .

[115]  W. Dietrich,et al.  Downstream Ecological Effects of Dams: A geomorphic perspective , 1995 .

[116]  S. Fennessy,et al.  Review of: Restoration of aquatic ecosystems: Science, technology, and public policy: Committee on Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems-Science, Technology, and Public Policy, National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC , 1993 .

[117]  J. Hervouet TELEMAC modelling system: an overview , 2000 .

[118]  Daniel R. Parsons,et al.  Assessing the credibility of a series of computational fluid dynamic simulations of open channel flow , 2003 .

[119]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Channel type and salmonid spawning distribution and abundance , 1999 .

[120]  S. N. Lane,et al.  Application of Digital Photogrammetry to Complex Topography for Geomorphological Research , 2000 .

[121]  T. C. Chamberlin The Method of Multiple Working Hypotheses: With this method the dangers of parental affection for a favorite theory can be circumvented. , 1965, Science.