Contagion Models in Credit Risk

This chapter aims to give an account of mathematical techniques for credit risk models where there is contagion between the obligors, i.e. default of one party either directly causes default of other parties or (more commonly) changes other parties’ risk of default. While various approaches are possible, the treatment here concentrates on ‘reduced-form’ models based on Markov chains. We argue that such models provide a flexible and computationally efficient framework. Subsidiary but important themes of the chapter are the role of information (i.e., whether various factors influencing default risk are observable or ‘latent’), and changes of measure, either from ‘physical’ to ‘risk neutral’ and vice versa or, in the context of econometric studies, computation of likelihood functions for parameter estimation. We start in Section 2 with a general discussion of joint distributions and copulas, mainly to point out that ‘contagion’ is in some sense already built into the copula concept. Section 3 gives a general formulation of the reduced-form model and a taxonomy of models distinguishing between factor, frailty and contagion models. Section 4 gives some background information about Markov processes, Markov chains and phase-type distributions as required for the subsequent sections. We then discuss, in Section 5, four simple but effective Markov chain-based models with applications in counterparty risk and credit risk for inhomogeneous and homogeneous portfolios1. The following two sections, §6 and §7 develop the ‘subsidiary themes’ mentioned above, before we return in Section 8 to further development of the Enhanced Risk homogeneous portfolio model, introduced in Section 5.4, in the light of these these themes. Finally, following the concluding Section 9, Appendix A summarizes information about Piecewise-Deterministic Markov Processes, which play an essential role in our discussion.

[1]  R. C. Merton,et al.  On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates , 1974, World Scientific Reference on Contingent Claims Analysis in Corporate Finance.

[2]  Thorsten Schmidt,et al.  Pricing and hedging of credit derivatives via the innovations approach to nonlinear filtering , 2012, Finance Stochastics.

[3]  Stéphane Crépey,et al.  Markov Chain Models of Portfolio Credit Risk , 2011 .

[4]  M. Jeanblanc,et al.  Counterparty Risk on a CDS in a Markov Chain Copula Model with Joint Defaults , 2010 .

[5]  Mark H. A. Davis,et al.  Arrow–Debreu Prices , 2010 .

[6]  Dynamic hedging of synthetic CDO tranches with spread risk and default contagion , 2010 .

[7]  Prasanna Gai,et al.  Contagion in financial networks , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[8]  L. Rüschendorf On the distributional transform, Sklar's theorem, and the empirical copula process , 2009 .

[9]  D. Filipović Term-Structure Models: A Graduate Course , 2009 .

[10]  D. Crisan,et al.  Fundamentals of Stochastic Filtering , 2008 .

[11]  Dawn Hunter Pricing kth-to-default swaps under default contagion: the matrix analytic approach , 2008 .

[12]  Hyun Song Shin,et al.  Risk and Liquidity in a System Context , 2006 .

[13]  J. Yang,et al.  Network Models and Financial Stability , 2008 .

[14]  Mark H. A. Davis,et al.  LARGE PORTFOLIO CREDIT RISK MODELING , 2007 .

[15]  Stephen J. Taylor,et al.  Closed-Form Transformations from Risk-Neutral to Real-World Distributions , 2004 .

[16]  Modelling Default Contagion Using Multivariate Phase-Type Distributions , 2007 .

[17]  Christine M. Anderson-Cook,et al.  Book review: quantitative risk management: concepts, techniques and tools, revised edition, by A.F. McNeil, R. Frey and P. Embrechts. Princeton University Press, 2015, ISBN 978-0-691-16627-8, xix + 700 pp. , 2017, Extremes.

[18]  D. Duffie,et al.  Common Failings: How Corporate Defaults are Correlated , 2006 .

[19]  Mark H. A. Davis,et al.  A Hidden Markov Model of Default Interaction , 2003 .

[20]  Søren Asmussen,et al.  Applied probability and queues, Second Edition , 2003, Applications of mathematics.

[21]  Cleve B. Moler,et al.  Nineteen Dubious Ways to Compute the Exponential of a Matrix, Twenty-Five Years Later , 1978, SIAM Rev..

[22]  Duncan J Watts,et al.  A simple model of global cascades on random networks , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Carol Alexander Mastering risk, volume 2: applications , 2001 .

[24]  M. Davis,et al.  Infectious defaults , 2001 .

[25]  Larry Eisenberg,et al.  Systemic Risk in Financial Networks , 1999, Manag. Sci..

[26]  Mark H. A. Davis,et al.  Modelling default correlation in bond portfolios , 1999 .

[27]  Mark H. Davis Markov Models and Optimization , 1995 .

[28]  J. Klein,et al.  Statistical Models Based On Counting Process , 1994 .

[29]  Niels Keiding,et al.  Statistical Models Based on Counting Processes , 1993 .

[30]  P. Protter Stochastic integration and differential equations , 1990 .

[31]  Sلأren Asmussen,et al.  Applied Probability and Queues , 1989 .

[32]  Anne Lohrli Chapman and Hall , 1985 .

[33]  P. Brémaud Point processes and queues, martingale dynamics , 1983 .

[34]  L. Rogers,et al.  Diffusions, Markov processes, and martingales , 1979 .

[35]  S. Varadhan,et al.  Diffusion processes with continuous coefficients, I , 1969 .

[36]  D. Blackwell,et al.  On the Identifiability Problem for Functions of Finite Markov Chains , 1957 .