In-beam PET imaging for on-line adaptive proton therapy: an initial phantom study

We developed and investigated a positron emission tomography (PET) system for use with on-line (both in-beam and intra-fraction) image-guided adaptive proton therapy applications. The PET has dual rotating depth-of-interaction measurable detector panels by using solid-state photomultiplier (SSPM) arrays and LYSO scintillators. It has a 44 mm diameter trans-axial and 30 mm axial field-of-view (FOV). A 38 mm diameter polymethyl methacrylate phantom was placed inside the FOV. Both PET and phantom axes were aligned with a collimated 179.2 MeV beam. Each beam delivered ∼50 spills (0.5 s spill and 1.5 s inter-spill time, 3.8 Gy at Bragg peak). Data from each beam were acquired with detectors at a given angle. Nine datasets for nine beams with detectors at nine different angles over 180° were acquired for full-tomographic imaging. Each dataset included data both during and 5 min after irradiations. The positron activity-range was measured from the PET image reconstructed from all nine datasets and compared to the results from simulated images. A (22)Na disc-source was also imaged after each beam to monitor the PET system's performance. PET performed well except for slight shifts of energy photo-peak positions (<1%) after each beam, due mainly to the neutron exposure of SSPM that increased the dark-count noise. This minor effect was corrected offline with a shifting 350-650 keV energy window for each dataset. The results show a fast converging of activity-ranges measured by the prototype PET with high sensitivity and uniform resolution. Sub-mm activity-ranges were achieved with minimal 6 s acquisition time and three spill irradiations. These results indicate the feasibility of PET for intra-fraction beam-range verification. Further studies are needed to develop and apply a novel clinical PET system for on-line image-guided adaptive proton therapy.

[1]  Jatinder Palta,et al.  In vivo verification of proton beam path by using post-treatment PET/CT imaging. , 2009, Medical physics.

[2]  K. Parodi.  In Vivo Dose Verification , 2011 .

[3]  Chan Hyeong Kim,et al.  Development of array-type prompt gamma measurement system for in vivo range verification in proton therapy. , 2012, Medical physics.

[4]  U Oelfke,et al.  Proton dose monitoring with PET: quantitative studies in Lucite. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  P. Price,et al.  Positron emission tomography imaging approaches for external beam radiation therapies: current status and future developments. , 2011, The British journal of radiology.

[6]  A. Del Guerra,et al.  A PET Prototype for “In-Beam” Monitoring of Proton Therapy , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[7]  W. Enghardt,et al.  The Feasibility of In-Beam PET for Therapeutic Beams of$^3$He , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[8]  R. Leahy,et al.  High-resolution 3D Bayesian image reconstruction using the microPET small-animal scanner. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Keiichi Nakagawa,et al.  The development and clinical use of a beam ON-LINE PET system mounted on a rotating gantry port in proton therapy. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  L Grevillot,et al.  A Monte Carlo pencil beam scanning model for proton treatment plan simulation using GATE/GEANT4 , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Zhi Deng,et al.  Development of an Eight-Channel Time-Based Readout ASIC for PET Applications , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[12]  Igor Mishustin,et al.  Distributions of positron-emitting nuclei in proton and carbon-ion therapy studied with GEANT4. , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  Céline Bataille,et al.  Management of radon: a review of ICRP recommendations , 2012, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[14]  I Buvat,et al.  Distributions of secondary particles in proton and carbon-ion therapy: a comparison between GATE/Geant4 and FLUKA Monte Carlo codes , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  Y. Shao,et al.  Development of a prototype PET scanner with depth-of-interaction measurement using solid-state photomultiplier arrays and parallel readout electronics , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Claude Comtat,et al.  IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION ALGORITHMS IN POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY , 2007 .

[17]  Katia Parodi,et al.  In-beam PET measurements of β+ radioactivity induced by proton beams , 2002 .

[18]  J Fan,et al.  Absolute dose reconstruction in proton therapy using PET imaging modality: feasibility study , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  K. Erlandsson,et al.  Fast accurate iterative reconstruction for low-statistics positron volume imaging. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  H Paganetti,et al.  The reliability of proton-nuclear interaction cross-section data to predict proton-induced PET images in proton therapy , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Comparison between in-beam and offline positron emission tomography imaging of proton and carbon ion therapeutic irradiation at synchrotron- and cyclotron-based facilities. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  S Derreumaux,et al.  Is it possible to verify directly a proton-treatment plan using positron emission tomography? , 1993, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[23]  Harald Paganetti,et al.  Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for proton beam therapy. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  Igor Mishustin,et al.  PET monitoring of cancer therapy with 3He and 12C beams: a study with the GEANT4 toolkit. , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  Zhi Deng,et al.  Energy and Timing Measurement with Time-Based Detector Readout for PET Applications: Principle and Validation with Discrete Circuit Components. , 2011, Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section A, Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment.

[26]  Joel S. Karp,et al.  Physics and Instrumentation in PET , 2005 .

[27]  Harald Paganetti,et al.  Clinical application of in-room positron emission tomography for in vivo treatment monitoring in proton radiation therapy. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[28]  K Parodi,et al.  Potential application of PET in quality assurance of proton therapy. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[29]  W. W. Moses,et al.  List-mode maximum-likelihood reconstruction applied to positron emission mammography (PEM) with irregular sampling , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[30]  Wolfgang Enghardt,et al.  On the detector arrangement for in-beam PET for hadron therapy monitoring , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[31]  Daisuke Kokuryo,et al.  Development of a small prototype for a proof-of-concept of OpenPET imaging , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[32]  C Lartizien,et al.  GATE: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[33]  H. Paganetti.  Range uncertainties in proton therapy and the role of Monte Carlo simulations , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[34]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Implementation and workflow for PET monitoring of therapeutic ion irradiation: a comparison of in-beam, in-room, and off-line techniques , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[35]  J S Karp,et al.  Design study of an in situ PET scanner for use in proton beam therapy , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[36]  K Parodi,et al.  In-beam PET measurements of beta+ radioactivity induced by proton beams. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[37]  H Paganetti,et al.  Systematic analysis of biological and physical limitations of proton beam range verification with offline PET/CT scans , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[38]  Katia Parodi,et al.  PET/CT imaging for treatment verification after proton therapy: a study with plastic phantoms and metallic implants. , 2007, Medical physics.

[39]  K. Parodi,et al.  Experimental study on the feasibility of in-beam PET for accurate monitoring of proton therapy , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[40]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Charged hadron tumour therapy monitoring by means of PET , 2004 .

[41]  Michael Fenech,et al.  Mitigating the risk of radiation-induced cancers: limitations and paradigms in drug development , 2014, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[42]  Keiichi Nakagawa,et al.  Experimental verification of proton beam monitoring in a human body by use of activity image of positron-emitting nuclei generated by nuclear fragmentation reaction , 2008, Radiological physics and technology.

[43]  F Verhaegen,et al.  Monte Carlo calculations of positron emitter yields in proton radiotherapy , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[44]  H Paganetti,et al.  Clinical CT-based calculations of dose and positron emitter distributions in proton therapy using the FLUKA Monte Carlo code , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[45]  Antony Lomax,et al.  In vivo proton range verification: a review , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[46]  Irène Buvat,et al.  PET-based dose delivery verification in proton therapy: a GATE based simulation study of five PET system designs in clinical conditions , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.